Visual discomfort is predicted from a luminance map with a model based on the receptive field mechanism in the human eye. A centre-surround receptive field is described by a Difference of Gaussians. Eight commercially available office luminaires are assessed for visual discomfort in a paired comparison experiment. The correlation between the subjective data and the receptive field model is optimized for three factors: the centre Gaussian width, the surround Gaussian width and the centre-to-surround weighing factor (WF). A centre and surround visual angle of 0.53 and 2.19 min arc, respectively, and a WF of 0.87 result in a coefficient of determination of 0.77. The model is validated independently with magnitude estimation data obtaining a coefficient of determination of 0.82. Where the standard unified glare rating method fails (coefficient of determination of 0.45), the receptive field model ameliorates predictability for visual discomfort. The model based on receptive fields is promising to replace current standard glare metrics, specifically when non-uniform luminaires are to be evaluated.
Light sources causing annoyance or pain produce discomfort glare. Traditional glare metrics fail for non-uniform luminaires. As an alternative, visual discomfort is determined by a model incorporating the centre–surround receptive field mechanism, the pupillary light reflex and a correction for retinal position. The pupil area, controlled by the pupillary light reflex, regulates the retinal illuminance. A centre–surround receptive field, described by a difference of Gaussians, represents the visual signal. A correction according to the Guth position index accounts for the reduction in brightness perception when a light source is moved away from the line of sight. The model is analysed with a forced choice paired comparison experiment involving 17 non-uniform rear projected stimuli with different spatial frequencies and luminance steps. A coefficient of determination of 0.68 between the subjective assessment and the model is obtained. A paired comparison office luminaire experiment and a magnitude estimation experiment involving diffusor luminaires validate the model resulting in a coefficient of determination of 0.86 and 0.81, respectively. By including the pupillary light reflex, receptive field mechanism and a correction for retinal position, the more physiologically justified model is a promising alternative to current, often empirical, glare metrics, especially for non-uniform luminaires.
Discomfort glare is defined as glare that causes discomfort without necessarily impairing the vision of objects. Traditional glare metrics fail for non-uniform luminaires. As an alternative, visual discomfort is determined by a physiological model incorporating the centresurround receptive field mechanism and the pupillary light reflex. The pupil area, controlled by the pupillary light reflex, regulates the retinal illuminance. A centre-surround receptive field, described by a difference of Gaussians, represents the visual signal. The centre excites the signal whereas the surround controls the inhibition. A forced choice paired comparison experiment involves 7 non-uniform rear projected stimuli with different spatial frequencies. Inspired by a promising coefficient of determination of 0.90, the model is a candidate to replace current glare metrics as UGR or VCP, especially when nonuniform luminaires are to be evaluated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.