The surgical management of patients with osteosarcoma is challenging. No difference in survival has been shown between amputations and adequately performed limb-salvaging procedures. Optimal tumor resection and a functional residual limb with increased patient survival are the goals of modern orthopedic oncology.

Background The minimally invasive lateral transpsoas retroperitoneal approach to address lumbar stenosis offers advantages to traditional approaches, including sparing of the AP annulus and longitudinal ligament and less risk to the peritoneal contents and retroperitoneal vascular structures. Few studies have presented longitudinal measures of radiographic indirect decompression and relief of pain and restoration of function using the lateral approach to spine fusion. Question/purposes We determined (1) whether radiographic measures suggestive of decompression were achieved after surgery and maintained 1 year after surgery, (2) whether the intervention resulted in sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes scores 1 year after surgery, and (3) the frequency of pseudarthrosis on CT scans at 1 year after surgery in patients with moderate or severe lumbar stenosis treated with the approach. Methods Between 2008 and 2012, 158 patients were surgically treated to alleviate symptoms associated with degenerative lumbar stenosis, of whom 60 (38%) were treated with lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Of these 60 patients, 36 (60%) received CT scans preoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively and were available for radiographic analysis. Of the 60 treated patients, 16 (27%) were lost to followup before 12 months, leaving the records of 44 patients available for review of patient-reported improvements in pain and return to function. Radiographic increases in disc height, foraminal area, and canal area were measured by one observer on CT scans postoperatively and at 1 year and compared to preoperative values. Patient-reported scores, including VAS pain score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were collected preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions to Authors on jbjs.org for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors on jbjs.org for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Altogether, 50 primary total hip arthroplasties were performed in a prospective, blinded, randomized study comparing a bipolar sealer device to standard electrocautery for hemostasis. Cohorts were evaluated for intra- and postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, hemoglobin levels and modified Harris hip scores. Variables such as age, gender and body mass index were correlated to transfusion requirements. Total blood loss in the bipolar sealer group was decreased by 40% and transfusions were reduced by 73%. There was a significant reduction in the intra- and postoperative blood loss, p = 0.002 and p = 0.001, respectively. There was no difference in clinical hip scores between groups. The bipolar sealer was an effective coagulation alternative for total hip arthroplasties, reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements without affecting outcome. It appears to reduce tissue damage and smoke production in comparison with standard electrocautery. These results were found even in patients with demographic characteristics associated with a higher risk of blood-related complications.

Current technology does not offer a single best reconstruction option for children. Previous studies and the present series have indicated that physical and emotional functioning in patients treated with an expandable endoprosthesis are good but that complication rates remain high. Amputation and rotationplasty are alternative treatments if patients and their families are amenable to these procedures. The literature supports no single superior treatment among these three options with regard to physical or emotional health.

No abstract

No abstract