Cellular senescence is a cell state implicated in various physiological processes and a wide spectrum of age-related diseases. Recently, interest in therapeutically targeting senescence to improve healthy aging and age-related disease, otherwise known as senotherapy, has been growing rapidly. Thus, the accurate detection of senescent cells, especially in vivo, is essential. Here, we present a consensus from the International Cell Senescence Association (ICSA), defining and discussing key cellular and molecular features of senescence and offering recommendations on how to use them as biomarkers. We also present a resource tool to facilitate the identification of genes linked with senescence, SeneQuest (available at http://Senequest.net). Lastly, we propose an algorithm to accurately assess and quantify senescence, both in cultured cells and in vivo. Cellular Senescence: Walking a Line between Life and Death Cell states link both physiological and stress signals to tissue homeostasis and organismal health. In both cases, the outcomes vary and are determined by the signal characteristics (type, magnitude, and duration), spatiotemporal parameters (where and when), and cellular capacity to respond (Gorgoulis et al., 2018). In the case of potentially damaging stress, damage is reversed and the structural and functional integrity of cells restored. Alternatively, damage can be irreversible, and cells activate death mechanisms mainly to restrict the impact on tissue degeneration. Between these extremes, cells can acquire other states, often associated with survival but also with permanent structural and functional changes. An example is the non-proliferative but viable state, distinct from G0 quiescence and terminal differentiation, termed cellular senescence (Rodier and Campisi, 2011). Formally described in 1961 by Hayflick and colleagues, cellular senescence, derived from the latin word senex meaning ''old'' (Hayflick and Moorhead, 1961), was originally observed in normal diploid cells that
The E2F family of transcription factors is essential in the regulation of the cell cycle and apoptosis. While the activity of E2F1-3 is tightly controlled by the retinoblastoma family of proteins, the expression of these factors is also regulated at the level of transcription, post-translational modifications and protein stability. Recently, a new level of regulation of E2Fs has been identified, where micro-RNAs (miRNAs) from the mir-17-92 cluster influence the translation of the E2F1 mRNA. We now report that miR-20a, a member of the mir-17-92 cluster, modulates the translation of the E2F2 and E2F3 mRNAs via binding sites in their 3-untranslated region. We also found that the endogenous E2F1, E2F2, and E2F3 directly bind the promoter of the mir-17-92 cluster activating its transcription, suggesting an autoregulatory feedback loop between E2F factors and miRNAs from the mir-17-92 cluster. Our data also point toward an antiapoptotic role for miR-20a, since overexpression of this miRNA decreased apoptosis in a prostate cancer cell line, while inhibition of miR-20a by an antisense oligonucleotide resulted in increased cell death after doxorubicin treatment. This anti-apoptotic role of miR-20a may explain some of the oncogenic capacities of the mir-17-92 cluster. Altogether, these results suggest that the autoregulation between E2F1-3 and miR-20a is important for preventing an abnormal accumulation of E2F1-3 and may play a role in the regulation of cellular proliferation and apoptosis.
The adenovirus E1A oncogene activates p53 through a signaling pathway involving the retinoblastoma protein and the tumor suppressor p19 ARF . The ability of E1A to induce p53 and its transcriptional targets is severely compromised in ARF-null cells, which remain resistant to apoptosis following serum depletion or adriamycin treatment. Reintroduction of p19 ARF restores p53 accumulation and resensitizes ARF-null cells to apoptotic signals. Therefore, p19ARF functions as part of a p53-dependent failsafe mechanism to counter uncontrolled proliferation. Synergistic effects between the p19 ARF and DNA damage pathways in inducing p53 may contribute to E1A's ability to enhance radio-and chemosensitivity.
Here we report that RNA interference against ATM inhibited p53 accumulation in cells expressing oncogenic STAT5 and cooperated with Rb inactivation to suppress STAT5A-induced senescence. Knocking down ATM was also effective to bypass E2F1-induced senescence and in combination with Rb inactivation, inhibited RasV12-induced senescence. Cells that senesced in response to ca-STAT5A or RasV12 accumulated DNA damage foci and activated ATM, ATR, Chk1, and Chk2, indicating that aberrant oncogene activation induces a DNA damage signaling response. Intriguingly, bypassing oncogene-induced senescence by inactivation of p53 and Rb did not eliminate the accumulation of oncogene-induced DNA damage foci (ODDI), suggesting a mechanism that may limit transformation in immortalized cells.
SummaryWe show that the antidiabetic drug metformin inhibits the expression of genes coding for multiple inflammatory cytokines seen during cellular senescence. Conditioned medium (CM) from senescent cells stimulates the growth of prostate cancer cells but treatment of senescent cells with metformin inhibited this effect. Bioinformatic analysis of genes downregulated by metformin suggests that the drug blocks the activity of the transcription factor NF-jB. In agreement, metformin prevented the translocation of NF-jB to the nucleus and inhibited the phosphorylation of IjB and IKKa/b, events required for activation of the NF-jB pathway. These effects were not dependent on AMPK activation or on the context of cellular senescence, as metformin inhibited the NF-jB pathway stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in ampk null fibroblasts and in macrophages. Taken together, our results provide a novel mechanism for the antiaging and antineoplastic effects of metformin reported in animal models and in diabetic patients taking this drug.
The expression of oncogenic ras in normal human cells quickly induces an aberrant proliferation response that later is curtailed by a cell cycle arrest known as cellular senescence. Here, we show that cells expressing oncogenic ras display an increase in the mitochondrial mass, the mitochondrial DNA, and the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) prior to the senescent cell cycle arrest. By the time the cells entered senescence, dysfunctional mitochondria accumulated around the nucleus. The mitochondrial dysfunction was accompanied by oxidative DNA damage, a drop in ATP levels, and the activation of AMPK. The increase in mitochondrial mass and ROS in response to oncogenic ras depended on intact p53 and Rb tumor suppression pathways. In addition, direct interference with mitochondrial functions by inhibiting the expression of the Rieske iron sulfur protein of complex III or the use of pharmacological inhibitors of the electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation was sufficient to trigger senescence. Taking these results together, this work suggests that mitochondrial dysfunction is an effector pathway of oncogene-induced senescence.Mitochondria are central to cell metabolism and energy production. High-energy electrons coming from the oxidation of different carbon sources such as glucose and fatty acids enter the mitochondrial electron transport chain as reduced equivalents, and their energy gradually is converted into a proton gradient. Mitochondria use this gradient to synthesize ATP that later is used for biosynthetic reactions (9, 30). Mitochondria also control decisions for life and death. Changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability lead to the release of proapoptotic mediators that can kill cells with DNA damage or activated oncogenes (16). In this way, mitochondria control one of the major tumor suppressor responses: apoptosis (27). Some oncogenes, such as RasV12, STAT5, and Bcl2, have antiapoptotic activity, and some cell types have a high apoptosis threshold. Another tumor suppressor response, called cellular senescence, serves as a fail-safe mechanism against the transforming activity of antiapoptotic oncogenes (29,40,43). However, currently it is unknown whether mitochondria also can play a role in oncogene-induced senescence (OIS).OIS is phenotypically similar to the senescence response triggered by short telomeres, also known as replicative senescence (6). Replicative senescence is, in essence, the consequence of a DNA damage response triggered by short telomeres (11). OIS also involves the DNA damage response (2, 15, 28), but the mechanism of DNA damage and the contribution of mitochondria to it are unclear. It has been demonstrated that mitochondria play a critical role in replicative senescence, and several mitochondrial changes, including an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), were reported in cells with short telomeres (34, 35). Mitochondrion-derived ROS contribute to the senescent phenotype by damaging the DNA (35) and therefore amplifyin...
The p53 tumor suppressor promotes cell cycle arrest or apoptosis in response to stress. Previous work suggests that the promyelocytic leukemia gene (PML) can act upstream of p53 to enhance transcription of p53 targets by recruiting p53 to nuclear bodies (NBs). We show that PML is itself a p53 target gene that also acts downstream of p53 to potentiate its antiproliferative effects. Hence, p53 is required for PML induction in response to oncogenes and DNA damaging chemotherapeutics. Furthermore, the PML gene contains p53 binding sites that confer p53 responsiveness to a heterologous reporter and can bind p53 in vitro and in vivo. Finally, cells lacking PML show a reduced propensity to undergo senescence or apoptosis in response to p53 activation, despite the induction of several p53 target genes. These results identify an additional element of PML regulation and establish PML as a mediator of p53 tumor suppressor functions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.