Ferrets were tested in a semicircular apparatus to determine the effects of auditory cortical lesions on their ability to localize sounds in space. They were trained to initiate trials while facing forward in the apparatus, and sounds were presented from one of two loudspeakers located in the horizontal plane. Minimum audible angles were obtained for three different positions, viz., the left hemifield, with loudspeakers centered around -60 degrees azimuth; the right hemifield, with loudspeakers centered around +60 degrees azimuth; and the midline with loudspeakers centered around 0 degrees azimuth. Animals with large bilateral lesions had severe impairments in localizing a single click in the midline test. Following complete destruction of the auditory cortex performance was only marginally above the level expected by chance even at large angles of speaker separation. Severe impairments were also found in localization of single clicks in both left and right lateral fields. In contrast, bilateral lesions restricted to the primary auditory cortex resulted in minimal impairments in midline localization. The same lesions, however, produced severe impairments in localization of single clicks in both left and right lateral fields. Large unilateral lesions that destroyed auditory cortex in one hemisphere resulted in an inability to localize single clicks in the contralateral hemifield. In contrast, no impairments were found in the midline test or in the ipsilateral hemifield. Unilateral lesions of the primary auditory cortex resulted in severe contralateral field deficits equivalent to those seen following complete unilateral destruction of auditory cortex. No deficits were seen in either the midline or the ipsilateral tests.
Six albino rats were used in tests of sound localization around midline and in left and right lateral field positions (i.e., 0 degree, -60 degrees, and +60 degrees azimuth). Each of the animals performed at high levels on the midline task but had great difficulty with tests in the left and right fields. Minimum audible angles for midline localization were obtained for 2 subjects and were estimated as 11.5 degrees and 13.5 degrees. Performance levels on the hemifield tests for each of the 6 animals, however, were too low to permit estimates of threshold even with speakers separated by 60 degrees. The differences between midline and lateral field sound localization are discussed.
1. The ability of ferrets to localize sound in space was determined before and after unilateral or bilateral lesions of the superior olivary complex (SOC). Lesions were made by pressure injection of kainic acid into the SOC through a stereotaxically positioned glass micropipette. The lesions destroyed the cell bodies in the superior olive without disrupting fibers of passage in the trapezoid body or other pathways in the auditory brain stem. The integrity of fibers was demonstrated by protargol staining of axonal processes and by the retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) from the inferior colliculus to other auditory brain stem nuclei. Behavioral tests were carried out separately for sound localization at midline and lateral field positions. Minimum audible angles were determined for single 45-ms noise bursts presented through paired loudspeakers positioned symmetrically around 0, -60, and +60 degrees azimuth. 2. Four ferrets received complete lesions of the left SOC, and two received complete lesions of the right SOC. In general, unilateral destruction of the superior olive resulted in impairments in sound localization in both left and right lateral fields. In some cases, deficits were also apparent on midline. Four additional animals received unilateral lesions that spared cells within the SOC. In most cases, deficits were apparent despite incomplete lesions of the SOC. The pattern of deficits was generally consistent with that found in animals with complete lesions. Most animals had difficulty localizing sounds in the lateral fields. 3. Four animals received bilateral lesions of the SOC. Three had complete or near-complete destruction of the superior olive on one side of the brain with relatively minor damage on the other side. Each of these animals exhibited behavioral deficits that were particularly severe ipsilateral to the more extensively damaged superior olive. One animal with complete bilateral destruction of the SOC was incapable of sound localization, even with 2-s noise bursts. This animal, however, suffered severe motor impairments after surgery that might have contributed to the apparent inability to localize sound. 4. Two animals with kainic acid lesions that caused little or no damage to the SOC were still capable of high levels of performance in tests of sound localization and had no elevation in minimum audible angles. These cases served as controls for the possible effects of nonspecific brain damage and demonstrated that kainic acid injections per se resulted in no obvious deficits in our test situation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Two-choice and three-choice tests were used to evaluate the effects of bilateral auditory cortical lesions on pure-tone sound localization by the albino rat. Both tests required that animals approach a distant sound source to obtain water reinforcement. Stimuli were single noise and tone bursts, 65 ms in duration including 20-ms rise and fall times. Tone frequencies were 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 kHz adjusted to 40 dB (SPL) above the rat's absolute threshold. Five animals were tested in the two-choice situation following bilateral ablation of auditory cortex. Some reduction in performance was observed relative to normals, but impairments were not severe. Similar results were obtained for 2 brain-damaged animals tested in the three-choice situation. Thus, the ability to localize sounds in space remained intact after complete destruction of auditory cortex, and there was no indication of a frequency-dependent deficit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.