To assess dynamic brain function in adults who had stuttered since childhood, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was measured with H2O and PET during a series of speech and language tasks designed to evoke or attenuate stuttering. Speech samples were acquired simultaneously and quantitatively compared with the PET images. Both hierarchical task contrasts and correlational analyses (rCBF versus weighted measures of dysfluency) were performed. rCBF patterns in stuttering subjects differed markedly during the formulation and expression of language, failing to demonstrate left hemispheric lateralization typically observed in controls; instead, regional responses were either absent, bilateral or lateralized to the right hemisphere. Significant differences were detected between groups when all subjects were fluent-during both language formulation and non-linguistic oral motor tasks-demonstrating that cerebral function may be fundamentally different in persons who stutter, even in the absence of stuttering. Comparison of scans acquired during fluency versus dysfluency-evoking tasks suggested that during the production of stuttered speech, anterior forebrain regions-which play an a role in the regulation of motor function-are disproportionately active in stuttering subjects, while post-rolandic regions-which play a role in perception and decoding of sensory information-are relatively silent. Comparison of scans acquired during these conditions in control subjects, which provide information about the sensorimotor or cognitive features of the language tasks themselves, suggest a mechanism by which fluency-evoking maneuvers might differentially affect activity in these anterior and posterior brain regions and may thus facilitate fluent speech production in individuals who stutter. Both correlational and contrast analyses suggest that right and left hemispheres play distinct and opposing roles in the generation of stuttering symptoms: activation of left hemispheric regions appears to be related to the production of stuttered speech, while activation of right hemispheric regions may represent compensatory processes associated with attenuation of stuttering symptoms.

Vocalization in lower animals is associated with a well-described visceromotor call system centered on the mesencephalic periacqueductal grey matter (PAG), which is itself regulated by paramedian cortical structures. To determine the role this phylogenetically older system plays in human phonation, we contrasted voiced and unvoiced speech using positron emission tomography and then evaluated functional connectivity of regions that significantly differentiated these conditions. Vocalization was associated with increased and highly correlated activity within the midline structures--PAG and paramedian cortices--described in lower mammalian species. Concurrent activation and connectivity of neocortical and subcortical motor regions--medial and lateral premotor structures and elements of basal ganglia thalamocortical circuitry--suggest a mechanism by which this system may have come under an increasing degree of voluntary control in humans. Additionally, areas in the temporal lobe and cerebellum were selectively activated during voiced but not unvoiced speech. These regions are functionally coupled to both visceromotor and neocortical motor areas during production of voiced speech, suggesting they may play a central role in self-monitoring and feedback regulation of human phonation.

Speech-related changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were measured using H(2)(15)O positron-emission tomography in 9 adults with adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) before and after botulinum toxin (BTX) injection and 10 age- and gender-matched volunteers without neurological disorders. Scans were acquired at rest and during production of continuous narrative speech and whispered speech. Speech was recorded during scan acquisition for offline quantification of voice breaks, pitch breaks, and percentage aperiodicity to assess correlations between treatment-related changes in rCBF and clinical improvement. Results demonstrated that speech-related responses in heteromodal sensory areas were significantly reduced in persons with ADSD, compared with volunteers, before the administration of BTX. Three to 4 weeks after BTX injection, speech-related responses were significantly augmented in these regions and in left hemisphere motor areas commonly associated with oral-laryngeal motor control. This pattern of responses was most strongly correlated with the objective measures of clinical improvement (decreases in the frequency of voice breaks, pitch breaks, and percentage aperiodicity). These data suggest a pathophysiological model for ADSD in which BTX treatment results in more efficient cortical processing of sensory information, making this information available to motor areas that use it to more effectively regulate laryngeal movements.

Adductor spasmodic dysphonia involves an overadduction of the vocal folds during speech causing uncontrolled voice and pitch breaks and slow, effortful speech. The disorder is resistant to speech therapy and often recurs following initial benefit from unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve resection. Botulinum toxin injections into multiple sites of the thyroarytenoid muscle on one side were performed in 16 patients. Speech was recorded prior to injection and three times post-injection. Symptoms were measured by two examiners from speech spectrograms without knowledge of speaker identity or recording session. Significant (p less than or equal to 0.03) reductions in pitch and voice breaks, phonatory aperiodicity, and sentence time occurred only when injections resulted in unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Symptoms returned with the restoration of vocal fold movement, 3 months later. Reduction in speed of swallowing without aspiration was reported in 80% of cases. Although speech volume was reduced, there were no instances of aphonia.

No abstract