Our data demonstrate that 2-CdA is highly effective in inducing CR in 84% of patients with MALT-type lymphoma.

Background: Extranodal marginal zone B cell lymphoma of the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is a relatively common type of lymphoma. Owing to its B cell lineage, it appears to be a potential target for treatment with the CD20 antibody rituximab. We present an analysis of our experience with rituximab for treatment of patients with advanced MALT lymphoma. Patients and Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with histologically verified MALT lymphoma undergoing treatment with rituximab was done. After reassessment of histological samples for the presence of MALT lymphoma, patients were evaluated as regards date of diagnosis, prior therapy for MALT lymphoma, sites of involvement upon treatment with rituximab, clinical response in terms of complete remission (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease as well as symptomatic response, duration of response and survival. Results: A total of 9 patients with advanced MALT lymphoma undergoing therapy with single-agent rituximab were identified. All patients received treatment at a dose of 375 mg/m² once weekly ×4. One patient each had relapsed after chemotherapy and radiation, respectively, while none of the other 7 patients had received prior cytotoxic treatment or radiation. Three patients achieved a CR, 2 patients had PR for 6 and 14 months, while the remaining patients had SD between 8 and 18+ months. One patient died of progressive disease in spite of the initiation of chemotherapy and 1 patient succumbed to a cardiovascular event while having been in ongoing PR for 11 months. The other 7 patients are currently alive with disease 10–27 months after initiation of therapy. Follow-up biopsies for histological assessment were available in 5 patients with gastric lymphoma. In 1 patient with SD, however, persistence of CD20-positive cells within lymphoepithelial lesions was noted in spite of almost complete depletion of B lymphocytes from the normal gastric mucosa, suggesting either recirculation of MALT lymphoma cells to these lesions or defining lymphoepithelial lesions as a sanctuary site from rituximab penetration. Conclusion: Rituximab had only moderate activity in terms of inducing objective responses in our unselected and heterogeneous cohort of patients with disseminated MALT lymphoma. Long-term disease stabilization, however, along with a symptomatic benefit was seen in all patients. Our data nevertheless indicate that rituximab might not optimally penetrate into the gastric mucosa in all patients.

Previous phase I-II clinical trials have shown that recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) can ameliorate anemia in a portion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Therefore, we performed a randomized controlled multicenter study to define the optimal initial dosage and to identify predictors of response to rHuEpo. A total of 146 patients who had hemoglobin (Hb) levels < or = 11 g/dL and who had no need for transfusion at the time of enrollment entered this trial. Patients were randomized to receive 1,000 U (n = 31), 2,000 U (n = 29), 5,000 U (n = 31), or 10,000 U (n = 26) of rHuEpo daily subcutaneously for 8 weeks or to receive no therapy (n = 29). Of the patients, 84 suffered from MM and 62 from low- to intermediate- grade NHL, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia; 116 of 146 (79%) received chemotherapy during the study. The mean baseline Hb level was 9.4 +/- 1.0 g/dL. The median serum Epo level was 32 mU/mL, and endogenous Epo production was found to be defective in 77% of the patients, as judged by a value for the ratio of observed-to-predicted serum Epo levels (O/P ratio) of < or = 0.9. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate treatment efficacy. The median average increase in Hb levels per week was 0.04 g/dL in the control group and -0.04 (P = .57), 0.22 (P = .05), 0.43 (P = .01), and 0.58 (P = .0001) g/dL in the 1,000 U, 2,000 U, 5,000 U, and 10,000 U groups, respectively (P values versus control). The probability of response (delta Hb > or = 2 g/dL) increased steadily and, after 8 weeks, reached 31% (2,000 U), 61% (5,000 U), and 62% (10,000 U), respectively. Regression analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model and classification and regression tree analysis showed that serum Epo levels and the O/P ratio were the most important factors predicting response in patients receiving 5,000 or 10,000 U. Approximately three quarters of patients presenting with Epo levels inappropriately low for the degree of anemia responded to rHuEpo, whereas only one quarter of those with adequate Epo levels did so. Classification and regression tree analysis also showed that doses of 2,000 U daily were effective in patients with an average platelet count greater than 150 x 10(9)/L. About 50% of these patients are expected to respond to rHuEpo. Thus, rHuEpo was safe and effective in ameliorating the anemia of MM and NHL patients who showed defective endogenous Epo production. From a practical point of view, we conclude that the decision to use rHuEpo in an individual anemic patient with MM or NHL should be based on serum Epo levels, whereas the choice of the initial dosage should be based on residual marrow function.

One hundred twenty-one anemic, transfusion-dependent patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were randomly allocated to receive (a) recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) 10,000 U/d subcutaneously 7 days a week (fixed dose group) (n = 38), or (b) rhEPO 2,000 U/d subcutaneously for 8 weeks followed by step- wise escalation of the rhEPO dose (titration group) (n = 44), or (c) no rhEPO therapy (control group) (n = 39). The total treatment period was 24 weeks. There were no differences between the three groups with regard to baseline clinical, demographic, or health status measures. The cumulative response frequency, defined as elimination of the transfusion need in combination with an increase in the hemoglobin concentration by >20 g/L, was 60% in both rhEPO treatment groups and 24% in the control group (P = .01 and .02, respectively, log rank test). For patients in the titration group the response rate on the first dose level (2,000 U/d) was only 14%. Cox's univariate regression analysis revealed that an inadequately low endogenous erythropoietin concentration in relation to the degree of anemia and a baseline platelet concentration > or = 100 x 10(9)/L were significant predictors for response to rhEPO therapy (P < .01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that relative erythropoietin concentration was the most important factor and the platelet count had no additional influence on response. Treatment with rhEPO was well tolerated. We conclude that treatment with rhEPO may be indicated in anemic MM and NHL patients with a relative erythropoietin deficiency. An initial dose of 5,000 U/d subcutaneously may be recommended.