Coastal areas in the EU are usually subjected to various anthropogenic pressures, with growing conflicts among economic activities. The FP7 project MESMA has developed a flexible framework to monitor and evaluate Spatially Managed Areas (SMAs) in both coastal and offshore waters and has tested it in nine case studies, one of which is a region in western Greece, including the Inner Ionian Archipelago and the adjacent gulfs. One of the first steps of the approach is to provide visualization of the main ecosystem components and human activities /pressures, on the basis of existing spatial information and expert judgment, addressing also issues related to data uncertainty. GIS tools were used for mapping ecosystem components, and main human activities. As substantial overlapping was identified between ecological features and human pressures, an effort was made to apply the principles of systematic conservation planning using the decision making tool Marxan, in order to propose scenarios aiming to contribute to the sustainable management of the area under study. Interaction with key stakeholders coming from various action arenas revealed the need for developing and enforcing more coherent and transparent strategies engaging endusers in the process.
Ecologically sustainable economic development (ESED) is considered to be a priority axis for policies designed for the preservation of ecosystems. In this context, the ESED concept has been operationally defi ned through several distinct approaches. Nevertheless, no consensus has been reached between and among approaches as to an operational interpretation and practical application of ESED. The present paper examines and evaluates the operational appeal of certain ESED approaches within the current policy framework regarding aquatic ecosystems. To this purpose, the paper investigates the relationship between representative approaches to ESED and the current policies for aquatic ecosystems in the European Union and the United States of America. These relatively mature policies offer operational grounds on which the operational dimensions of ESED approaches may be evaluated. Analysis focuses on the crucial question of to what extent the current major policies for aquatic ecosystems refl ect the rationale and conditions of the prevailing ESED scientifi c approaches.In this context, the concept of ecologically sustainable economic development (ESED) is considered an evolutionary path that may potentially pave the way to combating the environmental decay affl icting our planet.Many have been the scientifi c approaches proposed in dealing with ESED. They have arisen mainly from the variety of assumptions regarding the needs and preferences of future generations. However, the concept of sustainability 'remains ambiguous and widely abused even more than one and half decade after the Brundtland Commission coined it' (Meadows et al., 2004). The present paper examines to what extent the representative ESED approaches are operational and, subsequently, appealing at policy-making level. To this purpose, two policies regarding aquatic ecosystems have been selected: the Clean Water Act (CWA), which originated in the United States of America (USA), and the Water Framework Directive (WFD), which originated in the European Union (EU). On the one hand, the CWA was enacted in 1972. After this, it was signifi cantly strengthened in 1977, 1981 and 1987. The CWA is a mature policy, which has a long history of practical implementation and can be used as an indicative example of water policy-making worldwide. On the other hand, compared with the CWA, the WFD is a relevant new legislative framework. However, the WFD incorporates the experience and knowledge of a 12-year essential planning process.Taking the advantage offered by the maturity of both policies, the paper aims at identifying whether CWA and WFD do refl ect conditions, assumptions and policy frameworks proposed by the different ESED approaches. To this purpose, four major dimensions have been selected. They underlie and differentiate ESED approaches and will be used as the basis for evaluating these approaches' operational appeal in the content of the CWA and WFD. These are (i) the relationship between the natural and socioeconomic systems, (ii) the relationship between the h...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.