Autophagy as a primary homeostatic and catabolic process is responsible for the degradation and recycling of proteins and cellular components. The mechanism of autophagy has a crucial role in several cellular functions and its dysregulation is associated with tumorigenesis, tumor–stroma interactions, and resistance to cancer therapy. A growing body of evidence suggests that autophagy is also a key regulator of the tumor microenvironment and cellular immune response in different types of cancer, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Furthermore, autophagy is responsible for initiating the immune response especially when it precedes cell death. However, the role of autophagy in CRC and the tumor microenvironment remains controversial. In this review, we identify the role of autophagy in tumor microenvironment regulation and the specific mechanism by which autophagy is implicated in immune responses during CRC tumorigenesis and the context of anticancer therapy.
IntroductionSplenic hamartoma is a primary benign tumor of the spleen, which is often found incidentally. Splenic hamartomas are very rare, with approximately 150 cases documented in the literature to date. They represent benign vascular proliferation. Histological findings consist of disorganized stroma and vascular channels of varying width, with or without lymphoid follicles.Case presentationWe present the case of a 39-year-old Greek woman, with no significant medical history, who was diagnosed incidentally with an enormous splenic hamartoma on computed tomography, finally confirmed by surgery and histopathology. Hamartomas are benign lesions, and it is important to differentiate them from malignancy.ConclusionHamartoma represents a rare vascular entity characterized by a cluster of differentiation 8-positive immunophenotype. It is usually asymptomatic but large hamartomas may present with symptoms such as hemopoetic disorders, which resolve after splenectomy. It is important for radiologists to be able to differentiate splenic hamartoma from malignant entities.
50 Background: The aim is to investigate the effect of LMWH in combination with chemotherapy (C) and I in PC. Methods: BxPC-3, PANC-1, MIA PACA-2 cell lines were exposed in Tinzaparin (T) (0.5, 0.7, 0.9 μΜ) and/or 1 μΜ Nab-Paclitaxel (A) and/or 1 μΜ Gemcitabine (G) and/or 1 μΜ Nivolumab (NI), 1 μΜ, Pembrolizumab (PE) and 1 μΜ ipilimumab (IPI). Protein levels of VEGFR2, p-ERK1/2, p-AKT detected by Western blotting. Cells viability was measured through MTT assay. Results: Increasing protein levels of VEGFR2 was observed in all PC cell lines exposed to a constant dose of T and/or A,G. NI and PE +/- with IPI increased VEGFR2. In NI/PE+IPI+T scheme VEGFR2 levels were decreased (0.1-0.7 folds) in a dose dependent way in mtKRAS cells (PANC1, MIAPACA2). C (G or A) + I decreased VEGFR2 protein levels in mtKRAS cells PANC1 (0.1-0.4 folds), MIAPACA2 (0.1-0.6 folds) in double scheme. T+G/A+NI/PE+IPI scheme increased VEGFR2 in all PC cells. PANC-1 cells were decreased 40% in 0,7T+IPI+(NI or PE) after 48hours. The effect of these schemes on signaling pathways (MEK/EKR, AKT/mTOR) and apoptosis was identified through pERK1/2, pAKT, PARP, cl. caspase-3. Conclusions: These results identify the different effect of I alone or in combination with T and C in PC cells bearing mutant or wild type KRAS. Double or triple combination reduced VEGFR2 protein levels in mtKRAS and not in wtKRAS PC cells. The 0,7T+IPI+(NI or PE) combination decreases cell viability of PC cells through apoptosis. Testing of the combinatorial scheme T+chemo+IPI+(NI or PE) with PANC-1 PC in scid mice is ongoing and will be presented. NC:not changed, -:<20% protein vs control, +:>20% protein vs control, ++:>40% protein vs control. [Table: see text]
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.