If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.
Reduction of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is the key strategy of early interventions for improving the outcomes of first-episode psychosis. Although several controlled interventional studies have been conducted with the aim of reducing DUP, the results are highly inconsistent and conflicting. The current study systematically searches Web of Science and Ovid for English original articles investigating interventions adopted to reduce DUP, compared to a control intervention, up to April 6, 2017. Sixteen controlled interventional studies were retrieved, including 1964 patients in the intervention arm and 1358 in the control arm. The controlled intervention studies were characterized by standalone first episode psychosis services, standalone clinical high risk services, community interventions, healthcare professional training, and multifocus interventions. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted. There was no summary evidence that available interventions are successful in reducing DUP during the first episode of psychosis (Hedges’ g = −0.12, 95% CI = −0.25 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no differences within each subgroup, with the exception of clinical high risk services (Hedges’ g = −0.386, 95% CI = −0.726 to −0.045). These negative findings may reflect a parceled research base in the area, lack of prospective randomized controlled trials (only 2 randomized cluster designed studies were present) and small sample sizes. There was substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 66.4%), most of which was accounted by different definitions of DUP onset (R2 = .88). Psychometric standardization of DUP definition, improvement of study design, and implementation of preventative strategies seem the most promising avenues for reducing DUP and improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis.
BackgroundReduction of duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) is the key strategy of early interventions for improving the outcomes of first episode psychosis. Although several controlled interventional studies have been conducted with the aim of reducing DUP, the results are highly inconsistent and conflicting.MethodsThe current study systematically searched Web of Science and Ovid for English original articles investigating interventions adopted to reduce DUP, compared to a control intervention, up to 6th April 2017. 16 controlled interventional studies were retrieved, including 1964 patients in the intervention arm and 1358 in the control arm. The controlled interventions studies were characterised by: standalone first episode psychosis services, standalone clinical high risk services, community interventions, healthcare professional training and multifocus interventions. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted.ResultsThere was no summary evidence that available interventions are successful in reducing DUP during the first episode of psychosis (Hedges’ g = -0.12, 95%CIs -0.25 to 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed no differences within each subgroup, with the exception of clinical high risk services (Hedges’ g = -0.386, 95%CI -0.726 to -0.045). . There was substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 66.4%), most of which was accounted by different definitions of DUP onset (R2=0.88).DiscussionThese negative findings may reflect a parcelled research base in the area, lack of prospective randomized controlled trials (only two randomised cluster designed studies were present) and small sample sizes. Psychometric standardisation of DUP definition, improvement of study design and implementation of preventative strategies seem the most promising avenues for reducing DUP and improving outcomes of first-episode psychosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.