Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory disease associated with endotheliitis and microthrombosis. Objectives To correlate endothelial dysfunction to in-hospital mortality in a bi-centric cohort of COVID-19 adult patients. Methods Consecutive ambulatory and hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled. A panel of endothelial biomarkers and von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers were measured in each patient ≤ 48 h following admission.Results Study enrolled 208 COVID-19 patients of whom 23 were mild outpatients and 189 patients hospitalized after admission. Most of endothelial biomarkers tested were found increased in the 89 critical patients transferred to intensive care unit. However, only von Willebrand factor antigen (VWF:Ag) scaled according to clinical severity, with levels significantly higher in critical patients (median 507%, IQR 428-596) compared to non-critical patients (288%, 230-350, p < 0.0001) or COVID-19 outpatients (144%, 133-198, p = 0.007). Moreover, VWF high molecular weight multimers (HMWM) were significantly higher in critical patients (median ratio 1.18, IQR 0.86-1.09) compared to non-critical patients (0.96, 1.04-1.39, p < 0.001). Among all endothelial biomarkers measured, ROC curve analysis identified a VWF:Ag cut-off of 423% as the best predictor for in-hospital mortality. The accuracy of VWF:Ag was further confirmed in a Kaplan-Meier estimator analysis and a Cox proportional Hazard model adjusted on age, BMI, C-reactive protein and d-dimer levels. Conclusion VWF:Ag is a relevant predictive factor for in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. More than a biomarker, we hypothesize that VWF, including excess of HMWM forms, drives microthrombosis in COVID-19.

The circulating metabolome provides a snapshot of the physiological state of the organism responding to pathogenic challenges. Here we report alterations in the plasma metabolome reflecting the clinical presentation of COVID-19 patients with mild (ambulatory) diseases, moderate disease (radiologically confirmed pneumonitis, hospitalization and oxygen therapy), and critical disease (in intensive care). This analysis revealed major disease- and stage-associated shifts in the metabolome, meaning that at least 77 metabolites including amino acids, lipids, polyamines and sugars, as well as their derivatives, were altered in critical COVID-19 patient’s plasma as compared to mild COVID-19 patients. Among a uniformly moderate cohort of patients who received tocilizumab, only 10 metabolites were different among individuals with a favorable evolution as compared to those who required transfer into the intensive care unit. The elevation of one single metabolite, anthranilic acid, had a poor prognostic value, correlating with the maintenance of high interleukin-10 and -18 levels. Given that products of the kynurenine pathway including anthranilic acid have immunosuppressive properties, we speculate on the therapeutic utility to inhibit the rate-limiting enzymes of this pathway including indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase.

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired clinicobiological syndrome characterized by widespread activation of coagulation leading to fibrin deposition in the vasculature, organ dysfunction, consumption of clotting factors and platelets, and life-threatening hemorrhage. Disseminated intravascular coagulation is provoked by several underlying disorders (sepsis, cancer, trauma, and pregnancy complicated with eclampsia or other calamities). Treatment of the underlying disease and elimination of the trigger mechanism are the cornerstone therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic strategies specific for DIC aim to control activation of blood coagulation and bleeding risk. The clinical trials using DIC as entry criterion are limited. Large randomized, phase III clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of antithrombin (AT), activated protein C (APC), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and thrombomodulin (TM) in patients with sepsis, but the diagnosis of DIC was not part of the inclusion criteria. Treatment with APC reduced 28-day mortality of patients with severe sepsis, including patients retrospectively assigned to a subgroup with sepsis-associated DIC. Treatment with APC did not have any positive effects in other patient groups. The APC treatment increased the bleeding risk in patients with sepsis, which led to the withdrawal of this drug from the market. Treatment with AT failed to reduce 28-day mortality in patients with severe sepsis, but a retrospective subgroup analysis suggested possible efficacy in patients with DIC. Clinical studies with recombinant TFPI or TM have been carried out showing promising results. The efficacy and safety of other anticoagulants (ie, unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin) or transfusion of platelet concentrates or clotting factor concentrates have not been objectively assessed.

Introduction: Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) testing using dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (dRVVT) is challenging in patients receiving Direct Oral AntiCoagulants (DOAC) due to potential false positive results. In a multicenter study, we evaluated the in vitro removal of DOAC by activated charcoal (DOAC remove ®), allowing reliable dRVVT testing. Materials and Methods: Patient samples were analyzed before and after treatment with DOAC remove ® : 49 apixaban, 48 rivaroxaban, 24 dabigatran and 30 none. DOAC plasma concentrations were measured using anti-Xa or anti-IIa diluted thrombin time assays. In a subset of 28 samples, DOAC concentrations were also measured using HPLC-MS/MS following treatment with DOAC remove ®. DRVVT was performed using STA-Staclot dRVVT Screen ® /Confirm ® (Stago) or LAC-Screening ® /Confirm ® (Siemens). Results: Baseline median [min-max] concentrations were 94 [<20-479] for apixaban, 107 [<20-501] for rivaroxaban and 135 ng/mL [<20-792] for dabigatran; dRVVT screen ratio /confirm normalized ratio was positive in 47, 90 and 42 % of apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran samples. Treatment with DOAC remove ® did not affect dRVVT results in non-DOAC patients while it resulted in DOAC concentrations < 20 ng/mL in 82, 98 and 100 % of samples, respectively. Concentrations were < 5 ng/mL with HPLC-MS/MS in 5 out of 10, 8 out of 10 and 7 out of 8 samples, respectively. DOAC remove ® corrected DOAC interference with dRVVT assays allowed excluding LA in 76, 85 and 95 % of the patients, respectively. without affecting dRVVT results in non-DOAC patients. Conclusion: For dRVVT testing in DOAC patients, we suggest the use of DOAC remove ® for every rivaroxaban sample, whereas it might only be used in positive apixaban and dabigatran samples. A residual DOAC interference cannot be ruled out in case of persisting dRVVT positive results after treatment with DOAC remove ®. For those with persisting positive results, LA-diagnosis using dRVVT remains questionable.

Rivaroxaban and apixaban are selective direct inhibitors of free and prothrombinase-bound factor Xa (FXa). Surprisingly prothrombin time (PT) is little sensitive to clinically relevant changes in drug concentration, especially with apixaban. To investigate this pharmacodynamic discrepancy we have compared the kinetics of FXa inhibition in strictly identical conditions (pH 7.48, 37 °C, 0.15 M). KI values of 0.74 ± 0.03 and 0.47 ± 0.02 nM and kon values of 7.3 ± 1.6 10(6) and 2.9 ± 0.6 10(7) M(-1) s(-1) were obtained for apixaban and rivaroxaban, respectively. To investigate if these constants rationalise the inhibitor pharmacodynamics, we used numerical integration to evaluate impact of FXa inhibition on thrombin generation assay (TGA) and PT. Simulation predicted that in TGA triggered with 20 pM tissue factor, 100 ng/ml apixaban or rivaroxaban increased 1.8- or 3.0-fold the lag time and 1.4- or 2.0-fold the time to peak, whilst decreasing 1.2- or 3.1-fold the maximum thrombin and 1.7- or 3.5-fold the endogenous thrombin potential. These numbers were consistent with those obtained through the corresponding TGA triggered in plasma spiked with apixaban or rivaroxaban. Simulated PT ratios were also consistent with the corresponding plasma PT: markedly less sensitive to apixaban than to rivaroxaban. Analogous differences in TGA and PT were obtained irrespective of the drug amount added. We concluded that kon values for FXa of apixaban and rivaroxaban rationalise the unexpected lower sensitivity of PT and TGA to the former.

Objective The clinical relevance of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in COVID‐19 is controversial. This study was undertaken to investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of conventional and nonconventional aPLs in patients with COVID‐19. Methods This was a multicenter, prospective observational study in a French cohort of patients hospitalized with suspected COVID‐19. Results Two hundred forty‐nine patients were hospitalized with suspected COVID‐19, in whom COVID‐19 was confirmed in 154 and not confirmed in 95. We found a significant increase in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity among patients with COVID‐19 compared to patients without COVID‐19 (60.9% versus 23.7%; P < 0.001), while prevalence of conventional aPLs (IgG and IgM anti–β2‐glycoprotein I and IgG and IgM anticardiolipin isotypes) and nonconventional aPLs (IgA isotype of anticardiolipin, IgA isotype of anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I, IgG and IgM isotypes of anti–phosphatidylserine/prothrombin, and IgG and IgM isotypes of antiprothrombin) was low in both groups. Patients with COVID‐19 who were positive for LAC, as compared to patients with COVID‐19 who were negative for LAC, had higher levels of fibrinogen (median 6.0 gm/liter [interquartile range 5.0–7.0] versus 5.3 gm/liter [interquartile range 4.3–6.4]; P = 0.028) and C‐reactive protein (CRP) (median 115.5 mg/liter [interquartile range 66.0–204.8] versus 91.8 mg/liter [interquartile range 27.0–155.1]; P = 0.019). Univariate analysis did not show any association between LAC positivity and higher risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (odds ratio 1.02 [95% confidence interval 0.44–2.43], P = 0.95) or in‐hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.70–5.05], P = 0.24). With and without adjustment for CRP level, age, and sex, Kaplan‐Meier survival curves according to LAC positivity confirmed the absence of an association with VTE or in‐hospital mortality (unadjusted P = 0.64 and P = 0.26, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 [95% confidence interval 0.48–2.60] and 1.80 [95% confidence interval 0.67–5.01], respectively). Conclusion Patients with COVID‐19 have an increased prevalence of LAC positivity associated with biologic markers of inflammation. However, LAC positivity at the time of hospital admission is not associated with VTE risk and/or in‐hospital mortality.

No abstract

Introduction ST Genesia is a new automated system enabling quantitative standardized evaluation of thrombin generation (TG), for example, in patients receiving anti‐Xa direct inhibitors (xabans). Data on its analytical performances are scarce. Methods Over an 18‐month period, repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy were assessed using STG‐ThromboScreen (without or with thrombomodulin) or STG‐DrugScreen reagents (corresponding to intermediate/high tissue‐factor concentration, respectively), and controls. Furthermore, reproducibility was assessed using commercialized lyophilized and frozen normal pooled plasmas. Rivaroxaban and apixaban impacts on TG parameters were assessed using spiking experiments. Finally, a comparison with the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram method (CAT) (PPP reagent) was performed using plasma from healthy volunteers enrolled in the DRIVING‐studyNCT 01627665) before and after rivaroxaban intake. Results For all dedicated quality control (QC) levels, inter‐series coefficients of variations (CV) were <7% for temporal TG parameters, peak height (PH), and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), whether results were normalized with a dedicated reference plasma STG‐RefPlasma or not. Noteworthy, STG‐RefPlasma used for normalization displayed substantially high PH and ETP. Mean biases between the observed and manufacturer's assigned QC values were mostly <7%. Both rivaroxaban/apixaban plasma concentrations were significantly associated with TG parameters. Finally, Bland‐Altman plots showed a good agreement between ST Genesia‐STG‐ThromboScreen and CAT method within the explored range of values, although biases could be observed (PH: 16.4 ± 13.2%, ETP: 17.8 ± 11.9%). Conclusion ST Genesia® enables the reliable measurement of TG parameters in both in vitro and ex vivo xaban plasma samples using either STG‐ThromboScreen or STG‐DrugScreen according to xaban concentrations. The use of reference plasma, despite not completely reflecting a normal pooled plasma behavior, likely improves standardization and inter‐laboratory comparisons.