OBJECTIVE Assess the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and of liver fibrosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in unselected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A total of 561 patients with T2DM (age: 60 ± 11 years; BMI: 33.4 ± 6.2 kg/m2; and HbA1c: 7.5 ± 1.8%) attending primary care or endocrinology outpatient clinics and unaware of having NAFLD were recruited. At the visit, volunteers were invited to be screened by elastography for steatosis and fibrosis by controlled attenuation parameter (≥274 dB/m) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM; ≥7.0 kPa), respectively. Secondary causes of liver disease were ruled out. Diagnostic panels for prediction of advanced fibrosis, such as AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, were also measured. A liver biopsy was performed if results were suggestive of fibrosis. RESULTS The prevalence of steatosis was 70% and of fibrosis 21% (LSM ≥7.0 kPa). Moderate fibrosis (F2: LSM ≥8.2 kPa) was present in 6% and severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3–4: LSM ≥9.7 kPa) in 9%, similar to that estimated by FIB-4 and APRI panels. Noninvasive testing was consistent with liver biopsy results. Elevated AST or ALT ≥40 units/L was present in a minority of patients with steatosis (8% and 13%, respectively) or with liver fibrosis (18% and 28%, respectively). This suggests that AST/ALT alone are insufficient as initial screening. However, performance may be enhanced by imaging (e.g., transient elastography) and plasma diagnostic panels (e.g., FIB-4 and APRI). CONCLUSIONS Moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2 or higher), an established risk factor for cirrhosis and overall mortality, affects at least one out of six (15%) patients with T2DM. These results support the American Diabetes Association guidelines to screen for clinically significant fibrosis in patients with T2DM with steatosis or elevated ALT.

<b>Objective:</b> Assess the prevalence of NAFLD and of liver fibrosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in unselected patients with T2DM. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> 561 patients with T2DM (age: 60±11; BMI: 33.4±6.2 kg/m²; HbA1c: 7.5±1.8%) attending primary care or endocrinology outpatient clinics and unaware of having NAFLD. At the visit, volunteers were invited to be screened by elastography for steatosis and fibrosis by CAP (≥274 dB/m) and LSM (≥7.0 kPa), respectively. Secondary causes of liver disease were ruled out. Diagnostic panels for prediction of advanced fibrosis, such as APRI and FIB-4, were also measured. A liver biopsy was performed if results were suggestive of fibrosis.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> The prevalence of steatosis was 70% and of fibrosis 21% (LSM≥7.0 kPa). Moderate fibrosis (F2: LSM≥8.2 kPa) was present in 6% and severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-4: LSM≥9.7 kPa) in 9%, similar to that estimated by FIB-4 and APRI panels. Non-invasive testing was consistent with liver biopsy results. Elevated AST or ALT ≥40 U/L were present in a minority of patients with steatosis (8% and 13%, respectively) or with liver fibrosis (18% and 28%, respectively). This suggests that AST/ALT alone are insufficient as initial screening. However, performance may be enhanced by imaging (e.g., transient elastography) and plasma diagnostic panels (e.g., FIB-4, APRI).</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>Moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F≥2), an established risk factor for cirrhosis and overall mortality, affects at least one-out-of-six (15%) patients with T2DM. These results support the ADA guidelines to screen for clinically significant fibrosis in patients with T2DM with steatosis or elevated ALT.</p>

Low back pain (LBP) is amongst the top ten most common conditions presenting to primary care clinicians in the ambulatory setting. Further, it accounts for a significant amount of health care expenditure; indeed, over one third of all disability dollars spent in the United States is attributable to low back pain. In most cases, acute low back pain is a self-limiting disease. There are many evidence-based guidelines for the management of LBP. The most common risk factor for development of LBP is previous LBP, heavy physical work, and psychosocial risk factors. Management of LBP includes identification of red flags, exclusion of specific secondary causes, and comprehensive musculoskeletal/neurological examination of the lower extremities. In uncomplicated LBP, imaging is unnecessary unless symptoms become protracted. Reassurance that LBP will likely resolve and advice to maintain an active lifestyle despite LBP are the cornerstones of management. Medications are provided not because they change the natural history of the disorder, but rather because they enhance the ability of the patient to become more active, and in some cases, to sleep better. The most commonly prescribed medications include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and muscle relaxants. Although NSAIDs are a chemically diverse class, their similarities, efficacy, tolerability, and adverse effect profile have more similarities than differences. The most common side effects of NSAIDs are gastrointestinal. Agents with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selectivity are associated with reduced gastrointestinal bleeding, but problematic increases in adverse cardiovascular outcomes continue to spark concern. Fortunately, short-term use of NSAIDs for LBP is generally both safe and effective. This review will focus on the role of NSAIDs in the management of LBP.

No abstract

Context While T2D is a risk factor for liver fibrosis in NAFLD, the specific contribution of insulin resistance (IR) relative to other factors is unknown. Objective Assess the impact on liver fibrosis in NAFLD of adipose tissue (Adipo-IR) and liver (HOMA-IR) IR in people with T2D and NAFLD. Design Participants were screened by elastography in the outpatient clinics for hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, including routine metabolites, cytokeratin-18 (marker of hepatocyte apoptosis/steatohepatitis), and HOMA-IR/Adipo-IR. Setting University ambulatory care practice. Participants 483 participants with T2D. Intervention Screening for steatosis and fibrosis with elastography. Main outcome measures Liver steatosis (CAP) and fibrosis (LSM) and measurements of IR (Adipo-IR, HOMA-IR) and fibrosis (cytokeratin-18). Results Clinically significant liver fibrosis (stage F ≥ 2= LSM ≥8.0 kPa) was found in 11%, having more features of the metabolic syndrome, lower adiponectin, and higher AST, ALT, liver fat and cytokeratin-18 (p &lt; 0.05-0.01). In multivariable analysis including just clinical variables (model 1), obesity (BMI) had the strongest association with fibrosis (OR: 2.56, CI:1.87-3.50; p &lt; 0.01). When metabolic measurements and cytokeratin-18 were included (model 2), only BMI, AST and liver fat remained significant. When fibrosis stage was adjusted for BMI, AST, and steatosis (model 3), only adipo-IR remained strongly associated with fibrosis (OR: 1.51, CI:1.05-2.16; p = 0.03), but not BMI, hepatic IR or steatosis. Conclusions These findings pinpoint to the central role of dysfunctional, insulin-resistant adipose tissue to advanced fibrosis in T2D, beyond simply BMI or steatosis. The clinical implication is that targeting adipose tissue should be the priority of treatment in NAFLD.