teaches Communications in the Engineering Profession at the University of Waterloo. George specializes in developing engineering-communications curricula with authentic, discipline-specific materials in partnership with engineering firms and clients.
First-year engineering students often struggle to communicate the value of their work because they do not understand how problem-based reasoning drives engineering research and industry. Recognizing the effectiveness of discipline-specific teaching of the conventions of engineering communications, researchers have recently suggested the value of teaching the Swales "CARS" model to help students contextualize and justify their work. In two sections of Communications for the Engineering Profession at the University of Waterloo, we incorporated teaching of the Swales model of problem-based reasoning to help students understand the conventions of engineering communications, but found that authentic engineering documents are often too complex for this purpose. To address this limitation, we deployed engineering cases in two electrical/computer engineering courses to exemplify this model, and used pre-teaching and post-teaching surveys to measure students' perceptions of improvement in their ability to understand problem-based reasoning and apply it to project conceptualization. The results show that using simplified engineering cases of this kind both improves students' ability to use this model and improves their confidence in doing so. This outcome has implications for increasingly popular engineering-communications courses because it demonstrates the value of using realistic but simplified engineering scenarios to teach the Swales model in authentic and effective engineering communication.
The ability to communicate problem analysis and investigation is crucial to engineering students’ success. The Swales CARS model has generated considerable pedagogical interest because it describes how many engineers communicate in diverse documents. However, research has not yet reached any consensus about how effectively this model improves students’ ability to communicate problem analysis and investigation. In previous work, we reported that teaching the Swales CARS model and deploying an engineering case increased the students’ confidence to critique their own projects, but that study only focused on student impressions of their ability. To address this gap and expand on previous work, we evaluated students in a first-year engineering-communications course to determine whether teaching the Swales CARS model improved their ability to communicate problem analysis and investigation. Our results show our expanded approach generates considerable gains in these skills, which has far-reaching implications for the design of communications instruction in engineering programs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.