The comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic coagulation in thyroid surgery outcomes seems superior to other techniques with the exception of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. This network meta-analysis, one of a handful in a surgical field, offers preliminary and robust evidence to guide clinical decisions and policy makers to adopt safer thyroid operations.

Patients prefer a scar-less in the neck approach when given the option. A prospective comparative study is required to compare the cervical and extracervical approaches.

TORS of the tongue base with or without epiglottoplasty represents a promising treatment option with minimal morbidity for selected patients with OSA. Long-term prospective comparative evaluation is necessary to validate the findings of this study.

Despite a low uptake in the UK compared to the Far East, robotic thyroidectomy represents a viable option for selected patients, achieving superior cosmesis compared with conventional thyroidectomy at the expense of time and cost. The key is careful patient selection. A randomised study is needed to establish the clinical efficacy compared to conventional surgery in this population.

Poorly or inadequately performed RCTs and meta-analyses can give rise to incorrect results and thus fail to inform clinical practice or revise policy. The above barriers can be overcome by providing academic leadership and good organizational support to ensure that adequate personnel, resources, and funding are allocated to the researcher. Training in research methodology and data interpretation can ensure that trials are conducted correctly and evidence is adequately synthesized and disseminated. The ultimate goal of overcoming the barriers to evidence-based surgery includes the improved quality of patient care in addition to enhanced patient outcomes.

The robotic approach is feasible for performing targeted parathyroidectomy that avoids a neck scar. The clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the robotic approach compared with conventional targeted parathyroidectomy warrant further evaluation to establish if this represents a viable alternative to the existing targeted techniques.

There is not yet a generally accepted way to assess surgical candidacy based on the level of obstruction. Better organised clinical studies with well defined endpoints are needed. In the meanwhile, it appears that sleep nasendoscopy, acoustic reflectometry and pressure catheters can all provide useful information, and their use may be decided upon based on the experience and resources available in individual departments.

Mandibular body height, hyoid-mental length, and neck circumference in conjunction with the degree of mouth opening may determine patient suitability for TORS. Clinical evaluation is essential to validate their collective usefulness.