Background: Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are recommended for radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA), otherwise known as ankylosing spondylitis, when conventional therapies fail. We report efficacy and safety results of a Phase 3 study of ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets IL-17A, in bDMARDnaïve patients with r-axSpA. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, adult patients with inadequate response/intolerance to NSAIDs, an established diagnosis of r-axSpA, and with radiographic sacroiliitis centrally defined by modified New York criteria and ≥1 spondyloarthritis feature according to Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria were recruited from 84 sites (12 countries) in Europe, Asia, and North America. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated random sequence to 80 mg subcutaneous ixekizumab every two (Q2W) or four (Q4W) weeks, 40 mg adalimumab Q2W (active reference arm), or placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an ASAS40 response at Week 16. Findings: Between June 20, 2016 and August 22, 2017, 341 patients were randomized to placebo (N=87), adalimumab (N=90), ixekizumab Q2W (N=83), or ixekizumab Q4W (N=81). At Week 16, significantly more patients achieved ASAS40 with ixekizumab Q2W (n=43, 51•8%, p<0•0001), ixekizumab Q4W (n=39, 48•1%, p<0•0001), and adalimumab (n=32, 35•6%; p=0•0053) versus placebo (n=16, 18•4%). One serious infection occurred in each of the ixekizumab Q2W (1•2%), ixekizumab Q4W (1•2%), and adalimumab (1•1%) arms; none were reported with placebo. One (1•1%) Candida infection occurred in the adalimumab arm and one (1•2%) patient receiving ixekizumab Q2W was adjudicated as having probable Crohn's disease. No opportunistic infections, malignancies, or deaths occurred. Interpretation: Each dosing regimen of ixekizumab was superior to placebo for improving r-axSpA signs and symptoms in bDMARD-naïve patients; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies of ixekizumab. The adalimumab control arm performed as expected. Funding: Eli Lilly and Company Research in context Evidence before this study Pubmed was searched using the terms "ankylosing spondylitis", "axial spondyloarthritis", and "disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs", including articles through May 30, 2018. Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by inflammation of the spine and sacroiliac joint (SIJ), peripheral joint involvement, extra articular manifestations, and a strong genetic association with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27. Radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) was previously classified as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in 1984 and updated to r-axSpA as part of the ASAS criteria. Both criteria sets require the same radiographically confirmed structural damage to the sacroiliac joint as well as at least one accompanying clinical element. Recommendations for the management of r-axSpA generally include exercise and physiothera...

Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of abatacept, a selective T cell costimulation modulator, in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Methods. In this 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study, 170 PsA patients with a psoriasis target lesion (TL) >2 cm who had previously taken disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, were randomized (1:1: 1:1) to receive placebo or abatacept at doses of 3 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, or 30/10 mg/kg (2 initial doses of 30 mg/kg, followed by 10 mg/kg) on days 1, 15, and 29 and then once every 28 days thereafter. The primary end point was the American College of Rheumatology 20% criteria for improvement (ACR20 response) on day 169. Other key end points were magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores for joint erosion, osteitis, and synovitis, scores on the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, the investigator's global assessment of psoriasis, the TL score, and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score.Results. Proportions of patients achieving an ACR20 response were 19%, 33%, 48%, and 42% in the placebo, the abatacept 3 mg/kg, the abatacept 10 mg/kg, and the abatacept 30/10 mg/kg groups, respectively. Compared with placebo, improvements were significantly higher for the abatacept 10 mg/kg (P ‫؍‬ 0.006) and 30/10 mg/kg (P ‫؍‬ 0.022) groups, but not for 3 mg/kg group (P ‫؍‬ 0.121). All abatacept regimens resulted in improved MRI, HAQ, and SF-36 scores, with 10 mg/kg showing the greatest improvements. Improvements in the TL and PASI scores were observed in all abatacept arms; a response according to the investigator's global assessment was seen only with 3 mg/kg of abatacept. The safety profiles were similar among the treatment arms.Conclusion. The results of this study suggest that 10 mg/kg of abatacept, the approved dosage for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, may be an effective treatment option for PsA.Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by both arthritis and psoriasis ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00534313.

No abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the effect of a temporary interruption in subcutaneous (SC) abatacept on immunogenicity, safety and efficacy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate in a phase III trial.MethodsFollowing a 12-week open-label introduction (period I; intravenous abatacept loading dose and weekly fixed-dose SC abatacept 125 mg), patients were randomised 2:1 to double-blind SC placebo or SC abatacept for 12 weeks (period II). At the end of period II, patients receiving SC abatacept continued treatment and patients on placebo were reintroduced to SC abatacept (12-week open-label period III). The co-primary end points were ELISA-detected immunogenicity rate and safety at the end of period II. Efficacy was also monitored.ResultsOf 167 patients entering period I, 72% qualified for period II; during periods II and III, three patients discontinued treatment. Mean (SD) disease duration was 6.6 (6.5) years and Disease Activity Score 28 was 4.8 (0.8). The primary end point was met, with a non-significant increase in immunogenicity upon withdrawal (7/73 placebo vs 0/38 abatacept in period II; p=0.119) which was reversed upon reintroduction of SC abatacept (2/73 vs 1/38, end period III). Safety was comparable regardless of withdrawal, with no unexpected events upon reintroduction. Two patients experienced reactions at the SC injection site. On withdrawal, patients experienced slight worsening in efficacy which improved following reintroduction.ConclusionsOverall immunogenicity to SC abatacept is low, consistent with intravenous abatacept, and is not significantly affected by a 3-month interruption and reintroduction. This stop–start schedule was well tolerated, with little impact on safety and efficacy. These are important considerations for the clinical use of SC abatacept.ClinicalTrials govIdentifier NCT00533897