This study investigated whether listeners can use interaural time differences ͑ITDs͒ in the amplitude envelope to localize high-frequency sounds in a free field. Localization accuracy was measured for high-frequency ͑7 to 14 kHz͒ noise with and without an imposed amplitude modulation ͑AM͒ at 20, 80 or 320 Hz. Only AM at 320 Hz led to more accurate localization relative to the nonmodulated condition. The results of a control experiment suggest that the improvement in localization accuracy was due to an increase in stimulus bandwidth, rather than the temporal cues provided by the modulation.
Three experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of spatial separation of multiple talkers in the vertical plane on speech intelligibility. The first experiment demonstrated a release from masking due to separation in the median plane, and that this release was not due to the presence of residual interaural time differences (ITDs). The second experiment showed that this release corresponded to an increase in signal level of 1.3 dB. The third experiment demonstrated that the increase in intelligibility due to separation in elevation and that due to separation in azimuth were not additive. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for the design of spatial audio displays.
Several studies have described a release from speech-on-speech masking associated with separation of target and masker sources in the median sagittal plane. Some have excluded the possibility that small differences between target and masker interaural time disparities can fully account for this release. This study explored the mechanisms underlying the spatial release from speech-on-speech masking that can be obtained in the absence of such differences. In one condition, interaural time disparities were removed from the nominal median-sagittal-plane, head-related impulse responses used to generate the virtual auditory space within which competing sentences were presented. In other conditions, interaural level and spectral disparities also were manipulated by presenting competing sentences monaurally or diotically after convolution with one ear's head-related impulse responses. It was found that substantial spatial release from masking can be obtained in the absence of any interaural disparities and that such disparities probably make a relatively minor contribution to spatial release from speech-on-speech masking in the median sagittal plane. It is argued that this release from masking is driven primarily by a reduction in informational masking that occurs when monaural information at one, or both, of the listener's ears facilitates differentiation of competing sentences that emanate from spatially separated sources.
The accuracy with which a single source of sound can be localized has been examined in many studies, but very few studies have examined the ability of participants to determine the absolute locations of multiple sources of sound. The current study assessed participants' abilities to determine and remember the locations of up to six sources of environmental sound that were positioned at a range of azimuths and elevations in virtual auditory space. In experiment 1, a sequence of one to six sounds was presented one, three, or five times in each trial and the target sound was nominated following presentation of the last sequence. In experiment 2, memory load was held constant by nominating the target sound prior to a single sequence presentation. Localization accuracy was observed to decrease as the number of sounds was increased to three or more under the conditions of experiment 1, but not those of experiment 2. In experiment 1, localization was more accurate when sequences were presented more than once. Pronounced primacy and recency effects were observed for the six sound conditions in experiment 1. An analysis of errors for those conditions indicated that immediate temporal errors, but not immediate spatial errors, were over-represented.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.