Amadori A, Gentilini P, Bucchi L, Innocenti MP, Falcini F, Martini F, Fabbri M, Liverani M, Danesi S, Piantini B, Milandri C, Saragoni L, Amadori D. A registry‐based study of follow‐up failures in the screening experience of cervical cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8: 251–256.
Although all components of cervical screening are at risk of error, most studies of the previous screening experience of cervical cancer patients addressed only the false negative cytology results. Other reports showed the importance of screening failures not attributable to the Pap smear. We studied the relative frequency of all types of error observed in the screening history of 115 cervical cancer cases (median age, 60; range, 23–89) registered with the population‐based Romagna Cancer Registry in Forlì (northern Italy) between 1986 and 1993. For each case, a search was made for all cytology, colposcopy, biopsy, and treatment reports issued prior to diagnosis. Eighty‐one (70.4%) patients had never had a Pap smear. Eight (7.0%) were diagnosed at their first test. Twenty‐six patients (22.6%) had had at least one previous smear. Among these, 10 were screened during the five years prior to diagnosis: three patients had false negative cytology results, one patient did not comply with the recommendation for an early repeat smear, two patients with positive cytology results underwent colposcopy with considerable delay (7 and 9 months), one patient had a negative colposcopy (without biopsy), and three patients had biopsies histologically reported as negative. An overview of the registry‐based studies of screening histories reported so far from Italy (total number of cases 262) demonstrated that patients with serious shortcomings in follow‐up after smear test, colposcopy, biopsy, clinical assessment, and treatment accounted for a substantial proportion of screening failures.