The decision rules individuals use to judge wrongdoing committed inside corporations and other hierarchical organizations are not well understood. We explore this issue by asking random samples of individuals in Moscow, Tokyo, and Washington, D. C., to respond to four short vignettes describing acts of wrongdoing by people in corporations. The vignettes are experiments that manipulate the actor's mental state, the actor's position in the organization, and whether the actor's decision was influenced by others in the organization. We examine (1) the distribution of responsibility among people in the organization, (2) how individual responsibility affects the attribution of responsibility to the organization itself, and (3) cross‐national differences in attributions. We find that both what the actors did (their deeds) and the position they occupied (their roles) significantly influence the responsibility attributed to them. The responsibility attributed to the organizations themselves is a function of the responsibility attributed to the actors inside the organization, but not a function of the independent variables in the experiments. Cross‐national differences emerge with respect to the responsibility assigned both to individuals and to the organizations themselves. We discuss implications of these results for past and future work.
The decision rules indieriduals use to judge cvrongdoing committed inside corporations and other hierarchical organizations are not well understood.We explore this issue by asking random samples of individuals in Moscow, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C., to respond to four short vignettes describing acts of wrongdoing by people in corporations. The vignettes are expperiments that manipulate the actor's mental s w , the actor's position in the organization, and whether the actor's decision was influenced by others in the organid o n . We examine ( I ) the distribution of responsibility among people in the organization, (2) how individual responsibility affects the attribution of responsibility to the organization itself, and (3) cross-national differences in attributions. We find that both what the actors did (their deeds) and the position they occupied (their roles) signifkandy influence the responsibility attributed to them. The responsibility attributed to the organizations themselves is a function of the responsibiliey attributed to the actors inside the organization, but not a function of the independent variubles in the expm'ments. Cross-national differences emerge with respect to the responsibility Joseph Sanders is A. A. White Professor of Law at the University of Houston. V. Lee Hamilton is chair of the
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.