Few studies have presented a comparison of myeloablative cord blood transplantation (CBT) and HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for AML in a disease-specific analysis, and the evaluation of GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) in AML patients after unrelated CBT has not been reported. A total of 162 consecutive AML patients receiving intensified myeloablative unrelated CBT (n = 107) or allogeneic PBSC transplantation (allo-PBSCT) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HLA-identical sibling donor (n = 55) were investigated. Neutrophil or platelet engraftment was slower in the CBT cohort compared with that in the allo-PBSCT/BMT cohort. The incidence of grade II-IV or grade III-IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) were not significantly different in the two cohorts. Compared with the allo-PBSCT/BMT cohort, the CBT cohort had a significantly lower rate of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (13.7% vs 28.3%; P = 0.047) or extensive cGvHD (9.9% vs 24.1%; hazard ratio (HR) = 2.06, P = 0.039). The incidence of relapse at 5 years in the CBT cohort was significantly lower than that in the allo-PBSCT/BMT cohort (15.3% vs 36.1%; HR = 4.62, P = 0.009). The probabilities of overall survival and leukemia-free survival were similar between the two cohorts. The adjusted 5-year probability of GRFS was higher after CBT than that after allo-PBSCT/BMT (55.4% vs 39.2%; HR = 1.63, P = 0.042). The present study suggests that, for AML patients, intensified myeloablative unrelated CBT is associated with less cGvHD and a lower risk of relapse. In addition, these patients do not experience excessive TRM or severe aGvHD that translates into better GRFS compared with those patients who undergo HLA-identical sibling allo-PBSCT/BMT; this observation may reflect the clinical separation between cGvHD and GvL within our CBT protocol. INTRODUCTIONAllogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a promising curative approach for treating high-risk or relapsed/ refractory AML. Unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT) is increasingly being employed as an alternative transplant strategy for AML patients who lack a related or unrelated donor with an identical HLA type. Cord blood (CB) has some potential advantages, including the absence of donor risk, rapid accessibility and less rigorous requirement for HLA compatibility. Recently, reduced-intensity conditioning followed by CBT has been conducted for high-risk AML patients to decrease the early transplant-related mortality (TRM), 1,2 but the incidence of relapse was high (nearly 50%), and the long-term survival was very poor. New strategies should be further investigated to improve the antileukemic effect after CBT. We have reported that myeloablative CBT can result in improved survival and decreased relapse rates in adult or pediatric recipients with hematologic malignancies 3,4 compared with transplants from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD); however, few studies have presented a comparative analysis of myeloablative CBT and allo-HCT fro...
We report a single-center experience in treating 18 consecutive patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) who received unrelated cord blood transplantation (CBT). The median age was 17 years (range 5 --61 years). Sixteen cases received a reducedintensity regimen composed of CY (total dose1200 mg/m 2 ), rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG, total dose 30 mg/kg) and fludarabine (FLU, total dose 120 mg/m 2 ). CYA and mycophenolate mofetil were used as GVHD prophylaxis. Two patients were not evaluable for engraftment because of early death on day þ 21 and þ 22. Only one of the sixteen cases achieved engraftment, but experienced secondary graft failure 3 months post transplantation. Fifteen patients experienced primary graft rejection, but all of them acquired autologous recovery. The 3-month and 6-month cumulative incidence of response was 56% and 81%, respectively. So far, 16 patients have survived for 330 --1913 days (median, 750 days) after transplantation. The probability of OS at 2 years was 88.9%. Our data indicate that CBT for newly diagnosed SAA using no irradiation but FLU and ATG-based conditioning still seems to inevitably lead to the high risk of rejection, but may facilitate autologous recovery and improve survival with low risk of transplant-related mortality.
This study included data from 185 consecutively treated patients, 16 years of age or older, who underwent myeloablative transplantation using unrelated umbilical cord blood (UCB) (UCB transplantation (UCBT), n = 70) or HLA-identical sibling donor peripheral blood stem cells alone or combined with bone marrow (BMT/PBSCT, n = 115) from October 2001 to December 2012. All patients received myeloablative regimens, cyclosporin A plus mycophenolate mofetil as prophylaxis for GVHD, and similar supportive care. Although hematopoietic recovery was significantly delayed after UCBT, the rate of neutrophil engraftment was comparable. The median follow-up was 53 months (range, 15-136 months) for BMT/peripheral blood SCT (PBSCT) recipients and 35 months (range, 10-123 months) for UCBT recipients. There were no significant differences in the cumulative incidence of grades III to IV acute GVHD, relapse rate, or 3-year probabilities of disease-free survival between patients receiving UCBT and those receiving BMT/PBSCT. However, the cumulative incidence of chronic and extensive chronic GVHD was lower in UCBT recipients. The rates of long-term survivors returning to school or work and off immunosuppressive therapy were significantly higher after UCBT, which indicated that long-term survivors who underwent UCBT had a higher quality of life.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.