BackgroundCombining bronchodilators with different mechanisms of action may improve efficacy and reduce risk of side effects compared to increasing the dose of a single agent in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated this by combining two long-acting bronchodilators: once-daily muscarinic antagonist tiotropium and once-daily β2-agonist olodaterol.MethodsTwo replicate, double-blind, randomized, 12-week studies (ANHELTO 1 [NCT01694771] and ANHELTO 2 [NCT01696058]) evaluated the efficacy and safety of olodaterol 5 μg once daily (via Respimat®) combined with tiotropium 18 μg once daily (via HandiHaler®) versus tiotropium 18 μg once daily (via HandiHaler®) combined with placebo (via Respimat®) in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Primary efficacy end points were area under the curve from 0–3 hours of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 AUC0–3) and trough FEV1 after 12 weeks (for the individual trials). A key secondary end point was health status by St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (combined data set).ResultsOlodaterol + tiotropium resulted in significant improvements over tiotropium + placebo in FEV1 AUC0–3 (treatment differences: 0.117 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 1; 0.106 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 2) and trough FEV1 (treatment differences: 0.062 L [P<0.001], ANHELTO 1; 0.040 L [P=0.0029], ANHELTO 2); these were supported by secondary end points. These effects translated to improvements in SGRQ total scores (treatment difference −1.85; P<0.0001). The tolerability profile of olodaterol + tiotropium was similar to tiotropium monotherapy.ConclusionThese studies demonstrated that olodaterol (Respimat®) and tiotropium (HandiHaler®) provided bronchodilatory effects above tiotropium alone in patients with COPD. In general, both treatments were well tolerated.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is rare in children and few data are available in a pediatric general population. This study aims to calculate the annual incidence and prevalence of PAH and to describe these children in a large US population of patients aged under 18 years. Using the US MarketScan claims database we identified 695 children with PAH in 2010–2013. We calculated annual incidence rates and prevalence overall, by age and PAH type (idiopathic and non-idiopathic) using Byar’s method. We also described characteristics, co-morbidities, treatment patterns, and diagnostic procedures for these children. In 2010–2013, the annual incidence rates of PAH per 1,000,000 children-years was in the range of 4.8–8.1; 0.5–0.9 for idiopathic PAH and 4.3–7.3 for non-idiopathic PAH. The annual prevalence of PAH was in the range of 25.7–32.6 per 1,000,000 children; 4.4–6.0 for idiopathic PAH and 21.3–27.0 for non-idiopathic PAH. Incidence rates and prevalence were highest in children under age 2 years. Around 36% of affected children were born prematurely. Most (75%) had some type of congenital heart defect and 13% had Down’s syndrome. Most patients received PAH monotherapy (83%), while 13% received dual therapy. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors were the most commonly used treatments. Around 92% had at least one echocardiogram and 37% a right heart catheterization. PAH is very rare in children especially in the absence of etiological factors such as congenital heart defects. A large proportion of diagnoses in children seem to be based on echocardiography rather than right heart catheterization.
This claims-based predictive model provides an acceptable level of accuracy in identifying patients likely to have undiagnosed COPD in a large national health plan. Identification of patients with undiagnosed COPD may enable timely management and lead to improved health outcomes and reduced COPD-related health care expenditures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.