The opinions of entering medical students regarding interprofessional education (IPE), and their reasons, are described in this article. More female than male students favour IPE, 49 as compared to 25%. Students who endorse IPE give different reasons for their position than students who oppose it. The former group refer to increased communication and respect among health professionals, increased knowledge about mutual roles and function, greater equality among members of the health team and improved patient care. The opposing group fear that IPE would lower the quality of education by increasing class size and slow the pace of instruction to accommodate students with limited scientific backgrounds. Students also protest against having to study irrelevant subjects and acquire irrelevant skills. The opposing group is concerned primarily with IPE's effect on medical students; the group in favour is concerned more with the effect on patients and interprofessional relations. It seems that opinions about IPE are part of a basic attitudinal structure that medical students bring with them when they enter medical school. The implications for IPE in medical school are discussed.
Patient Management Problem (PMP) test scores have been questioned by many for their interpretability and validity. Despite these measurement problems, PMPs remain popular evaluation and research instruments. A paired-comparisons study was undertaken to investigate the relationship between performance and corresponding scores (proficiency andpathway). The scale values for the performances do not reflect the same relative quality ofperformance as the proficiency and pathway scores. Even more remarkable is the emergence of a different standard when performance is assessed as a whole. The findings of this study suggest that assigning points at the "option level" culminates in scores that cannot easily be interpreted and cannot readily be linked to the behavior they are supposed to represent. These conclusions have implications for construct validity and educational decisions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.