In utero alcohol exposure can disrupt the development of the fetal brain and result in a wide range of neurobehavioral outcomes collectively known as fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD). This paper provides a comprehensive review of the cognitive and behavioral outcomes of prenatal alcohol exposure, including domains of general intelligence, executive functioning, language development, learning and memory, adaptive functioning, academic performance, and concurrent psychopathology. In addition, the current status of the neurobehavioral profile of FASD and its potential as a diagnostic tool will be discussed.

Background This study aimed to develop an efficient and easily calculable risk score that can be used to identify an individual's risk of having been exposed to alcohol prenatally. Methods Data for this study were collected as part of the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders, Phases 2 and 3. Two cohorts (ages 5 to 17 years) completed a comprehensive neurobehavioral battery and a standard dysmorphology exam: a development cohort (DC; n = 325) and a comparative cohort (CC; n = 523). Both cohorts included two groups: those with histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure (AE‐DC, n = 121; AE‐CC, n = 177) and a control group that included subjects with minimal or no prenatal alcohol exposure (CON‐DC, n = 204; CON‐CC, n = 346). Behavioral assessments and physical exam data were combined using regression techniques to derive a risk score indicating the likelihood of prenatal alcohol exposure. Subjects were then divided into two subgroups: (1) low risk and (2) high risk. Chi‐square (χ2) determined classification accuracy and ROC curves were produced to assess the predictive accuracy. Correlations between risk scores and intelligence quotient and executive function scores were calculated. Results Subjects were accurately classified in the DC (χ2 = 78.61, p < 0.001) and CC (χ2 = 86.63, p < 0.001). The classification model also performed well in the DC (ROC = 0.835 [SE = 0.024, p < 0.001]) and CC (ROC = 0.786 [SE = 0.021, p < 0.001]). In the AE‐CC and CON‐CC, there were modest but significant associations between the risk score and executive function (AE‐CC: r = −0.20, p = 0.034; CON‐CC: r = −0.28, p < 0.001) and intelligence quotient (AE‐CC: r = −0.20, p = 0.034; CON‐CC: r = −0.28, p < 0.001). Conclusion(s) The risk score significantly distinguished alcohol‐exposed from control subjects and correlated with important cognitive outcomes. It has significant clinical potential and could be easily deployed in clinical settings.

Background Rating scales are designed to complement traditional performance‐based measures, and both can provide useful information about the functioning of youth with histories of prenatal alcohol exposure. Few studies, however, have compared ratings from multiple informants or the relationship between these subjective rating scale scores and the objective results from laboratory performance‐based scales. Methods The current study addressed both of these questions in 3 study groups: children with histories of prenatal alcohol exposure (n = 47), attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; n = 41), and typically developing controls (CON; n = 73). All subjects completed a standardized neuropsychological test battery, including laboratory measures of executive functioning and a self‐report measure of executive function behaviors. Parents and teachers completed corresponding rating scales of executive function behaviors for each subject. This study assessed the relationship between these behavior rating scales and corresponding neuropsychological tests, and interrater agreement among the multiple informants. Results Weak correlations were found between the rating scales and laboratory measures, indicating poor convergent validity for the behavior rating scale. Interrater reliability was found but it differed by group. Agreement was found between parent and teacher ratings for children with prenatal alcohol exposure, whereas teacher–child agreement was found for those with ADHD. Conclusions Findings from this study indicate that behavior ratings can be used to supplement laboratory measures but may not be measuring cognitive abilities regardless of whether a clinical diagnosis is present. A multimethod approach should be used when measuring skills in this domain. This was one of the first studies to examine cross‐informant agreement in a sample of children with prenatal alcohol exposure. Further research is necessary to understand why interrater agreement differed for children with prenatal alcohol exposure and those with ADHD.

PurposeThis study assessed whether the outcome of a screening tool for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASD), the FASD‐Tree, was associated with neuropsychological and behavioral outcomes.MethodsData for this study were collected as part of the fourth phase of the Collaborative Initiative on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (CIFASD‐4). Participants (N = 175, 5 to 16 years) with or without histories of prenatal alcohol exposure were recruited from San Diego and Minneapolis. Each participant was screened using the FASD‐Tree and administered a neuropsychological test battery; parents or guardians completed behavioral questionnaires. The FASD‐Tree incorporates physical and behavioral measures and provides an outcome regarding the presence of FASD (FASD‐Positive or FASD‐Negative). Logistic regression was used to test whether the FASD‐Tree outcome was associated with general cognitive ability, executive function, academic achievement, and behavior. Associations were tested in two groups: the whole sample and only correctly classified participants.ResultsResults of the FASD‐Tree were associated with neuropsychological and behavioral measures. Participants classified as FASD‐Positive were more likely than those classified as FASD‐Negative to have a lower IQ score and exhibit poorer performance on measures of executive and academic functions. Behaviorally, participants classified as FASD‐Positive were rated as having more behavior problems and adaptive difficulties. Similar relationships were found for all measures when including only participants correctly classified by the FASD‐Tree screening tool.ConclusionResults from the FASD‐Tree screening tool were associated with neuropsychological and behavioral measures. Participants classified as FASD‐Positive were more likely to have impairment in all domains tested. The results support the effectiveness of the FASD‐Tree as a screening tool for use in clinical settings, providing an efficient and accurate way to identify patients in need of additional evaluation.