BackgroundThis study was designed to measure in vivo effects of propofol, isoflurane and sevoflurane on apoptosis by measuring caspase-3 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) blood level as apoptotic markers.MethodsAfter obtaining ethical committee approval and informed written consents, sixty adult patients ASA I scheduled for open cholecystectomy participated in this study. They were randomally allocated into one of three equal groups to receive propofol infusion, low-flow isoflurane or sevoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia. Venous blood samples were collected preoperatively, immediately postoperative and after 24 hours to measure hemoglobin, hematocrit, creatinine, liver enzymes, serum TRAIL and caspase-3 levels.ResultsThere was no significant difference in hematological markers and serum creatinine. Liver enzymes showed significant postoperative rise (P < 0.05). In Propofol group, TRAIL and caspase-3 levels were significantly elevated immediately postoperative then decreased significantly after 24-hours (P < 0.05). In Isoflurane group, immediate postoperative level of TRAIL was significantly higher than 24 hours reading and significantly lower than its level in Propofol group at the same timing meanwhile caspase-3 levels were comparable at different timings. In Sevoflurane group, TRAIL and caspase-3 levels increased significantly in both postoperative samples than preoperative level and than those of Isoflurane and Propofol groups after 24 hours concerning TRAIL (P & 0.05).ConclusionsThis study concluded that isoflurane is superior and sevoflurane is the least effective among the three anesthetics in protection against apoptosis. This study neither proved nor excluded propofol-induced apoptosis. Further studies are required during lengthy procedure and in compromised patients.

Background: Cirrhotic patients have impaired hemostasis with variable incidence of hypersplenism necessitating splenectomy. Rotation thromboelastometery (ROTEM) facilitates diagnosis and guides management. This study evaluates perioperative effects of desflurane versus propofol on hemostasis in cirrhotic patients undergoing splenectomy guided by ROTEM and laboratory hemostatic tests. Methods: Thirty hepatic Child A patients, ASA II-III, of either sex, aged 25-55 years, undergoing splenectomy were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group D; anesthetized with desflurane 1 MAC (6%) and Group P; with propofol Target Controlled Infusion 2-5 µg/ml. Six blood samples were collected; preoperatively, after splenic artery ligation, immediately, first, third postoperative day then one month later. The samples were handled to measure complete blood picture, liver and kidney functions, screening coagulation tests (INR, PT and PTT), specific hemostatic factors (P-Selectin/CD62P, fibrinogen and D-dimer) as well as ROTEM criteria; clotting time (CT), clot formation time (CFT) and maximum clot firmness (MCF) via EX-TEM, IN-TEM and FIB-TEM commercial kits. Results: This study displayed postoperative hemoglobin reduction; however, platelet and WBCs as well as CT, CFT and MCF increased versus baseline. Screening and specific hemostatic factors as all other changes were within reference range and comparable between both groups. Conclusions: The current study concluded comparable effects of desflurane and propofol anesthesia on coagulation parameters within acceptable range as monitored by ROTEM and laboratory coagulation tests in cirrhotic patients with hypersplenism. Thus both anesthetics are considered safe in such patients who have high incidence of coagulopathy.

No abstract

No abstract