SUMMARY Secretory proteins perform a variety of important“ remote-control” functions for bacterial survival in the environment. The availability of complete genome sequences has allowed us to make predictions about the composition of bacterial machinery for protein secretion as well as the extracellular complement of bacterial proteomes. Recently, the power of proteomics was successfully employed to evaluate genome-based models of these so-called secretomes. Progress in this field is well illustrated by the proteomic analysis of protein secretion by the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis, for which ∼90 extracellular proteins were identified. Analysis of these proteins disclosed various“ secrets of the secretome,” such as the residence of cytoplasmic and predicted cell envelope proteins in the extracellular proteome. This showed that genome-based predictions reflect only∼ 50% of the actual composition of the extracellular proteome of B. subtilis. Importantly, proteomics allowed the first verification of the impact of individual secretion machinery components on the total flow of proteins from the cytoplasm to the extracellular environment. In conclusion, proteomics has yielded a variety of novel leads for the analysis of protein traffic in B. subtilis and other gram-positive bacteria. Ultimately, such leads will serve to increase our understanding of virulence factor biogenesis in gram-positive pathogens, which is likely to be of high medical relevance.
Type II signal peptidases (SPase II) remove signal peptides from lipid-modified preproteins of eubacteria. As the catalytic mechanism employed by type II SPases was not known, the present studies were aimed at the identification of their potential active site residues. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of 19 known type II SPases revealed the presence of five conserved domains. The importance of the 15 best conserved residues in these domains was investigated using the type II SPase of Bacillus subtilis, which, unlike SPase II of Escherichia coli, is not essential for viability. The results showed that only six residues are important for SPase II activity. These are Asp-14, Asn-99, Asp-102, Asn-126, Ala-128, and Asp-129. Only Asp-14 was required for stability of SPase II, indicating that the other five residues are required for catalysis, the active site geometry, or the specific recognition of lipid-modified preproteins. As Asp-102 and Asp-129 are the only residues invoked in the known catalytic mechanisms of proteases, we hypothesize that these two residues are directly involved in SPase II-mediated catalysis. This implies that type II SPases belong to a novel family of aspartic proteases.
Bacillus species are valuable producers of industrial enzymes and biopharmaceuticals, because they can secrete large quantities of high‐quality proteins directly into the growth medium. This requires the concerted action of quality control factors, such as folding catalysts and ‘cleaning proteases’. The expression of two important cleaning proteases, HtrA and HtrB, of Bacillus subtilis is controlled by the CssRS two‐component regulatory system. The induced CssRS‐dependent expression of htrA and htrB has been defined as a protein secretion stress response, because it can be triggered by high‐level production of secreted α‐amylases. It was not known whether translocation of these α‐amylases across the membrane is required to trigger a secretion stress response or whether other secretory proteins can also activate this response. These studies show for the first time that the CssRS‐dependent response is a general secretion stress response which can be triggered by both homologous and heterologous secretory proteins. As demonstrated by high‐level production of a nontranslocated variant of the α‐amylase, AmyQ, membrane translocation of secretory proteins is required to elicit this general protein secretion stress response. Studies with two other secretory reporter proteins, lipase A of B. subtilis and human interleukin‐3, show that the intensity of the protein secretion stress response only partly reflects the production levels of the respective proteins. Importantly, degradation of human interleukin‐3 by extracellular proteases has a major impact on the production level, but only a minor effect on the intensity of the secretion stress response.
The bacterial signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is believed to be a major targeting route for membrane proteins, as well as for subsets of secretory proteins. The present studies were aimed at an assessment of the role of two key components of SRP, namely Ffh and FtsY, in protein secretion by the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Our results show that both components are important for the extracellular accumulation of proteins containing known signal peptides. Remarkably, extracellular accumulation of individual proteins was affected to different extents by depletion of Ffh or FtsY, at least under the conditions tested. Moreover, the observed Ffh or FtsY dependence of certain secretory proteins did not seem to correlate with signal peptide length or hydrophobicity. Although it is presently difficult to distinguish between direct and indirect effects, these findings suggest that other, yet unidentified, determinants in secretory proteins are also important for their SRP dependence. High-level production of homologous and heterologous secretory proteins was shown to result in elevated cellular Ffh and FtsY levels. This phenomenon is, most likely, due to post-transcriptional regulation. In conclusion, the present proteomic dissection of SRP-dependent extracellular protein accumulation provides exciting leads to identify novel determinants for interactions between secretory proteins and SRP.
Bacillus subtilis is a prolific producer of enzymes and biopharmaceuticals. However, the susceptibility of heterologous proteins to degradation by (extracellular) proteases is a major limitation for use of B. subtilis as a protein cell factory. An increase in protein production levels has previously been achieved by using either protease-deficient strains or addition of protease inhibitors to B. subtilis cultures. Notably, the effects of genetic and chemical inhibition of proteases have thus far not been compared in a systematic way. In the present studies, we therefore compared the exoproteomes of cells in which extracellular proteases were genetically or chemically inactivated. The results show substantial differences in the relative abundance of various extracellular proteins. Furthermore, a comparison of the effects of genetic and/or chemical protease inhibition on the stress response triggered by (over) production of secreted proteins showed that chemical protease inhibition provoked a genuine secretion stress response. From a physiological point of view, this suggests that the deletion of protease genes is a better way to prevent product degradation than the use of protease inhibitors. Importantly however, studies with human interleukin-3 show that chemical protease inhibition can result in improved production of protease-sensitive secreted proteins even in mutant strains lacking eight extracellular proteases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.