A b~t r a c t L~~X e gas is currently being used for a variety of lung scanning studies in the evaluation ofpatients with pulmonary disease. This radionuclide was selected for a number of reasons: (1) it does not react chemically with body tissues; (2) its physical half-life is such that useful quantities can be supplied from distant sources; (3) its biological half-life is in the order of minutes and the absorbed dose to the patient, even from millicurie amounts, is minimal; (4) only nominal shielding is required for the X and gamma emissions; and (5) commercial dose calibrators are available, which express activity directly in mCi or pCi.In the chain of transfers necessary from receipt of the radioactive gas to final disposal of waste, leakage must be continually guarded against. In our experience over several years, leakage, when it has occurred, has most often been caused by excessive strain on connecting lines.However, film badge exposures for personnel involved have been consistently minimal and no overexposures have occurred, although we have handled as much as 2 Ci per month. Accident pre-planning, including careful consideration of containment and dispensing apparatus, ventilation and exhaust requirements, and dry runs, have contributed to this record.
Purpose: Deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) is a technique that has been increasingly utilized over the past several years for the purpose of reducing the radiation dose received by the heart and ipsilateral lung during radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to provide a comparative analysis of cardiac and lung dose in patients treated with and without moderate DIBH with an active breathing control (ABC) device during RT for left-sided breast cancer at a community radiation oncology center. Methods: From June 2013 to December 2014, 83 patients with stages 0-III left-sided breast cancer were treated with RT. Of these, 45 patients underwent CT simulation with an ABC device and the remaining 38 patients underwent standard free-breathing CT simulation for RT planning. Twenty-eight patients in the ABC cohort were treated with standard tangent fields and 18 were treated with locoregional RT. The non-ABC cohort included 26 patients treated with standard tangents and 12 treated with locoregional RT. A 4- or 5-field technique was utilized in all locally advanced patients to allow for coverage of the supraclavicular fossa and internal mammary lymph nodes with inclusion of low axillary coverage based on individual risk factors. All patients were treated with 3D-conformal techniques utilizing multi-leaf collimators to block the heart. Comparisons were made between mean heart dose, heart V5, mean lung dose, and lung V5 with and without the use of ABC. Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to determine significance between groups with α for significance set at p ≤0.05. Results: On combined analysis, the use of DIBH with ABC resulted in a reduction in heart V5 (1.5 versus 5.4%; p=0.018). Mean heart dose, mean lung dose, and lung V5 were not significantly improved with the use of ABC. On subgroup analysis, patients treated with locoregional RT had reduced mean heart dose (161 cGy versus 309 cGy; p=0.014) and heart V5 (2.3% versus 14.8%; p<0.001) compared to patients treated with a standard free-breathing technique. Conclusions: The use of ABC provided a significant reduction in heart V5 in all patients with left-sided breast cancer and in mean heart dose and heart V5 in patients treated with locoregional RT. This retrospective, single-institution analysis demonstrates the feasibility of implementing moderate DIBH with ABC technology in the treatment of left-sided breast cancer in a community radiation oncology center. Citation Format: Gogineni ES, Kehrer JD, Jones GC, Premo C, Stinson S. Active breathing control in the management of left-sided breast cancer with irradiation: A dosimetric analysis of cardiac and lung dose. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-06.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.