Improving care for intensive care survivors and their families requires collaboration between practitioners and researchers in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. Strategies were developed to address the major themes arising from the conference to improve outcomes for survivors and families.

Raising awareness of post-intensive care syndrome for the public and both critical care and non-critical care clinicians will inform a more coordinated approach to treatment and support during recovery after critical illness. Continued conceptual development and engagement with additional stakeholders is required.

No abstract

Medical oncologists and rehabilitation physicians share many similar attitudes with regard to the referral and acceptance of patients with advanced cancer for rehabilitation services. However, medical oncologists see prognosis as a more significant barrier to rehabilitation services than do rehabilitation physicians. Rehabilitation physicians are more likely to believe that the patients with advanced cancer for whom they care do not adequately understand their prognosis.

In this article, the subject of the future for the field of cancer rehabilitation is embarked upon. Future practice innovation models must involve the appropriate and comprehensive evaluation of cancer patients' rehabilitation needs using better functional measurement tools, as well as the forging of new partnerships through the presence and initiation of physiatric coordinated rehabilitation teams, particularly during the acute phases of treatment. Partnering rehabilitation teams closely with oncology colleagues during surveillance years, through the development of outpatient survivorship clinics for diagnosis and treatment of many of cancer patients' ongoing symptoms and functional limitations, will allow for more comprehensive and coordinated follow-up cancer care. Integration of rehabilitation into palliative care and continued efforts to increase oncology's awareness and acceptance of rehabilitation benefits and expertise are needed. Future education models for medical school, residency, and postresidency training are discussed, as are future research goals to help in placing cancer rehabilitation at the forefront of acute cancer care and survivorship care.

Patients with functional limitations resulting from cancer or its treatment made significant functional gains in inpatient rehabilitation. There were no significant differences in functional gains made by those with or without metastatic disease or those compliant versus noncompliant with the 60% rule. The presence of metastatic disease or a diagnosis not compliant with the 60% rule does not preclude cancer patients from making significant functional gains.

OBjECTivES: To determine incidence of bleeding in thrombocytopenic patients with cancer undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation. DESign: This is an observational cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTing: Acute inpatient academic rehabilitation facility. PARTiCiPAnTS: Adult patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation with functional impairments secondary to cancer. METhODS: Electronic records were reviewed for thrombocytopenic patients with cancer to determine platelet counts, bleeding events during rehabilitation, and anticoagulant medications prescribed. MAin OUTCOMES MEASUREMEnTS: Type and number of bleeding events, severity of bleeding by World Health Organization criteria. RESUlTS: Of the 278 patients with cancer admitted to acute rehabilitation over a 27-month time frame, 119 had at least one platelet count <150 000/µL. In all, 37 (31.1%) had a history of a bleeding event prior to the rehabilitation admission and 34 (28.6%) had at least one bleeding complication during their stay. Most events (87.5%) were of low grade (Grade 1 and 2 World Health Organization criteria). There was no association between platelet counts <11 000 or counts 11 000 to 20 000/µL and the occurrence of bleeding (P = .106 and P = .319, respectively). Although anticoagulants were common, there was no association found with a bleeding event and either anticoagulation status (receiving or not on such agents), specific anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, or a combination. COnClUSiOnS: Bleeding events in patients with cancer with thrombocytopenia during acute rehabilitation stay are not uncommon but are typically mild in severity and not associated with the degree of thrombocytopenia. Patients taking anticoagulants when platelet levels rose did experience bleeding events, but not at a statistically greater rate than those not taking such medications.

No abstract