S The purpose of this study was to describe how one primary teacher of poor and working class rural students promoted small‐group dialogue about books and literary concepts. Specifically, we focused on how she guided the students from the beginning of a lesson in ways that later led to dialogue during a videotaped four‐day lesson sequence. We analyzed interactions of teacher‐student talk during the sequence that involved reading, talking about, and responding to mysteries. Coding involved labeling “indicators” of instructional conversation outlined by Dalton (1997), coding other features of dialogue derived from theory, such as use of encouragement and pace for purposes of increasing thinking, and coding what we called “democratic supports,” such as providing opportunities for student decision making. Findings contribute to the field's growing literature on classroom dialogue in primary‐grade classrooms in three ways. First, teacher‐fronted talk and true dialogue are not mutually exclusive; the former can be used to achieve the other. The teacher highlighted in this study, Gayle, purposefully used heavy teacher‐fronted discourse, emphasizing telling, defining, and modeling at the beginnings of her lessons, which appeared to be critical to students' eventual participation. Secondly, additional instructional patterns not often illustrated in the literature on dialogue in the classroom, such as nonevaluative responses, encouragement rather than praise, examples and suggestions, and linguistic and paralinguistic cues such as pacing of talk and hand gestures, all appeared to assist students' participation. The teacher moved from careful, planned mediated action to spontaneous, genuine responses within the dialogic episodes. Finally, this study confirms other studies which suggest that classroom culture, characterized by a problem‐solving environment, student decision making, student choice, collaborative work, and product‐driven work, affects students' participation and subsequent construction of meaning during small‐group dialogue. El propoásito de este estudio fue describir la forma en que una docente de primaria de estudiantes pobres y de clase trabajadora de un medio rural promovió, en pequeños grupos, el diálogo sobre libros y conceptos literarios. Específicamente nos centramos en la forma como guió a los estudiantes desde el comienzo de una lección, llegando más tarde hasta el diálogo durante una secuencia de cuatro días en que las lecciones fueron videograbadas. Analizamos las interacciones verbales docente‐estudiante durante la secuencia que consistió en leer, hablar y responder sobre textos de misterio. La codificación incluyó identificar los “indicadores” de conversación didáctica delineados por Dalton (1997), codificar otros rasgos del diálogo derivados de la teoría, como por ejemplo el uso de la incentivación y el respeto por los tiempos individuales, con el propósito de incrementar el pensamiento y codificar lo que llamamos “soportes democráticos” tales como proporcionar oportunidades para la toma...
During the past four years, we have worked closely with our students' families, making efforts to get to know them better to improve classroom instruction in a multiage primary school classroom of six- to eight-year-olds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.