Self-poisoning is a common reason for acute presentation to hospital. Commonly involved drugs have been reported, but few data exist concerning the different combinations of agents or comparative doses ingested. The present study sought to better characterise the typical patterns of drug overdose that may present via the emergency department. Consecutive adults 16 years of age that presented to York Hospital owing to self-poisoning were studied for 2010-2011 inclusive. The primary outcome measure was reported dose, expressed as a multiple of the defined daily dose (DDD) to allow comparison between different agents. There were 1024 patients, including 622 women (60.7%), and median age was 32 years (range, 16 to 92 years). Overdose in men was associated with a higher overall quantity of drugs: arithmetic mean of 20 DDD multiples (95% CI, 15-26) versus 13 (11-15), p = 0.001. Overdose involved a single agent only in 538 patients (52.5%). The mean paracetamol dose was 4.0 (95% CI, 3.7-4.3) DDD multiples; the doses of antidepressants (19.4, 17.0-21.7, p < 0.0001) and benzodiazepines (18.0, 12.8-23.2, p < 0.0001) were comparatively higher. The types of agents involved in self-poisoning and common combinations of agents are characterised. Psychotropic medications were ingested in comparatively larger quantities than analgesic agents and had worse clinical outcome. Further work is required to understand the factors that determine the quantity of drug ingested in patients at risk of drug overdose so as to minimise the risk of significant toxicity.
In September 2012, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) substantially amended the Marketing Authorisation for acetylcysteine following an extensive review. The present study examined the impact of this license change on patterns of acetylcysteine use in patients presenting to hospital after paracetamol (acetaminophen) overdose. Between September 2011 and April 2013, 785 consecutive patients presented to York Hospital due to paracetamol overdose, and a before-after analysis was used to compare outcomes. There were 483 patients before and 302 patients after the license amendment, and age, gender, acute or staggered overdose pattern, and dose were similar in both groups. In the patients with paracetamol concentrations between the “100-line” and “200-line,” a significantly higher proportion received acetylcysteine treatment (51% before versus 98% after, P = 0.0029), as expected. A modest increase was also observed in relation to late or staggered overdose or cases where the time of ingestion was uncertain (53% versus 74%, P = 0.0430). The median duration of hospital stay increased across the entire study population, from 15 to 24 hours (P = 0.0159) due to the increased proportion of patients requiring acetylcysteine treatment. The findings indicate that the MHRA amendment is a financially costly intervention, and further studies are needed to examine clinical outcomes so that its cost effectiveness might be addressed.
The decision to administer antidote after paracetamol overdose is based on the extent of drug exposure, and this often relies on the reported dose. Few data exist concerning the validity of this approach in children. The present observational study sought to examine the relationship between the reported dose and paracetamol concentrations in patients aged ≤18 years admitted to York Hospital between October 2008 and November 2010 inclusive. There were 77 cases and casenotes were evaluable in 61, with median age 14 years (IQR 3-15 years), and weight 54.0 kg (18.2-63.5 kg), including 47 females (71%). Paracetamol dose was 83 mg/kg (57-148 mg/kg), and interval between ingestion and serum concentration was 4.5 hours (4.0-5.4 hours). There was a positive correlation between dose and equivalent 4-hour paracetamol concentration: Spearman's rho=0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.73, P< 0.0001. These findings support the importance of reported dose as part of initial risk assessment, especially in situations where laboratory determination is unhelpful, such as after a staggered ingestion.
Background: Antidepressant agents are commonly implicated in drug overdose, and the toxicological profile varies between agents. Clinical data concerning overdoses are not systematically sought or evaluated in pharmacovigilance. The present study sought to examine the feasibility of collecting Emergency Department data concerning antidepressant overdose. Methods : Presentations to York Hospital due to intentional antidepressant overdose were studied between 2010 and 2011. Data collected were the type of antidepressant, dose, co-ingested drugs, duration of hospital stay, and need for critical care. Community National Health Service prescription data were evaluated across York and North Yorkshire region. Results : There were 250 overdose episodes. These involved a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) in 183 (73.2%), and a tricyclic in 45 (18.0%), equivalent to 24 episodes per 100,000 prescription items (95% CI 21-28 per 100,000) and 11 per 100,000 (8-15 per 100,000) respectively (P<0.0001). Citalopram was the most commonly prescribed, and associated with 22 overdose episodes per 100,000 (17-27 per 100,000). Fluoxetine was associated with 32 overdose episodes per 100,000 (24-41 per 100,000) (P=0.032 versus citalopram), whereas the lower rates were observed for amitriptyline (13, 9-17 per 100,000) (P=0.004) and dosulepin (2, 0-10 per 100,000) (P=0.001). Conclusions : A higher than expected number of overdose episodes involved an SSRI based on National Health Service primary care prescribing, and fewer episodes involved a tricyclic antidepressant. Clinical outcomes differed between agents, indicating the feasibility of using Emergency Department data to detect different patterns of toxicity between antidepressants. Further work is required to examine whether systematic collection of clinical toxicology data might enhance existing pharmacovigilance systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.