This study measured distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and DPOAE input/output (I/O) curves to assess the effects of smoking on cochlear function. Twenty-four healthy adults, 12 smokers and 12 nonsmokers in the 20-30 years age range were selected based on self-reported histories of five to eight years of smoking or no smoking, respectively. All subjects received tympanometric screening to rule out middle ear pathology. Conventional (0.25-8 kHz) and ultra high frequency (UHF; 10-20 kHz) audiometry showed normal or age-appropriate thresholds across both groups. DPOAE results showed small, but significant, decline in DPOAE levels without concomitant changes in noise floors in smokers as compared to nonsmokers. I/O detection thresholds were also significantly elevated at high frequencies in smokers as compared to their nonsmoking counterparts. These findings indicate that smokers are at greater risk for cochlear damage than nonsmokers, and that DPOAE amplitudes and I/O detection thresholds may identify early changes in cochlear function in smokers.

Speech quality magnitude estimates (SQME's) were obtained from 12 sensorineurally impaired-hearing listeners on connected speech samples degraded by changing low-pass filter cutoff frequency, high-pass filter cutoff frequency, or percent total harmonic distortion (THD) by linear rectification. Log SQME's varied linearly with log bandwidth for filtered signals and with log percent undegraded (100-% THD) for linearly rectified signals. Significant variations were found among the slopes of the log-log functions for degradation modes and group-by-degradation mode interactions. Slope differences appeared to represent differential sensitivity of the listeners to changes in mode and degree of degradation. The findings are sufficiently encouraging to suggest that direct scaling procedures be employed in future studies of the evaluation of communication systems and the perception of complex signals.

Orientation and mobility O&M specialists are concerned with the ability of a person who is visually impaired to use hearing as well as vision in independent travel. Yet, there is no published research on the auditory requirements for making effective street crossings by individuals who are visually impaired or by individuals who are both visually and hearing impaired. Thus, this article presents the frequency and intensity measurements for traffic sounds under different conditions. It then compares these measurements to audiograms to illustrate how, given certain limitations and cautions, O&M specialists can estimate a traveler's ability to make safe traffic crossings.

No abstract

No abstract