Recent approaches for taking stiffness effects into account when modeling multifunctional polymer structures are reported. The theoretical part is focused on arbitrary tree‐like polymers, modeled through extensions of the GGS scheme that allows the inclusion of local constraints. The theoretical findings are compared to the results of numerical simulations in which stiffness is included into the bond fluctuation model with the help of additional bending potentials. The procedure is illustrated by evaluating the static properties of semiflexible linear chains, stars, cospectral polymers and rings. The dynamical properties are exemplified by the mechanical relaxation of semiflexible polymers, including situations in which the local conditions at different sites are the same or different.magnified image
We consider polymer structures which are known in the mathematical literature as "cospectral." Their graphs have (in spite of the different architectures) exactly the same Laplacian spectra. Now, these spectra determine in Gaussian (Rouse-type) approaches many static as well as dynamical polymer characteristics. Hence, in such approaches for cospectral graphs many mesoscopic quantities are predicted to be indistinguishable. Here we show that the introduction of semiflexibility into the generalized Gaussian structure scheme leads to different spectra and hence to distinct macroscopic patterns. Moreover, particular semiflexible situations allow us to distinguish well between cospectral structures. We confirm our theoretical results through Monte Carlo simulations.
Molecular simulations as well as single molecule experiments have been widely analyzed in terms of order parameters, the latter representing candidate probes for the relevant degrees of freedom. Notwithstanding this approach is very intuitive, mounting evidence showed that such description is not accurate, leading to ambiguous definitions of states and wrong kinetics. To overcome these limitations a framework making use of order parameter fluctuations in conjunction with complex network analysis is investigated. Derived from recent advances in the analysis of single molecule time traces, this approach takes into account of the fluctuations around each time point to distinguish between states that have similar values of the order parameter but different dynamics. Snapshots with similar fluctuations are used as nodes of a transition network, the clusterization of which into states provides accurate Markov-State-Models of the system under study. Application of the methodology to theoretical models with a noisy order parameter as well as the dynamics of a disordered peptide illustrates the possibility to build accurate descriptions of molecular processes on the sole basis of order parameter time series without using any supplementary information.
Recent advances in computational power and simulation programs finally delivered the first examples of reversible folding for small proteins with an all-atom description. But having at hand the atomistic details of the process did not lead to a straightforward interpretation of the mechanism. For the case of the Fip35 WW-domain where multiple long trajectories of 100 μs are available from D. E. Shaw Research, different interpretations emerged. Some of those are in clear contradiction with each other while others are in qualitative agreement. Here, we present a network-based analysis of the same data by looking at the local fluctuations of conventional order parameters for folding. We found that folding occurs through two major pathways, one almost four times more populated than the other. Each pathway involves the formation of an intermediate with one of the two hairpins in a native configuration. The quantitative agreement of our results with a state-of-the-art reaction coordinate optimization procedure as well as qualitative agreement with other Markov-state-models and different simulation schemes provides strong evidence for a multiple folding pathways scenario with the presence of intermediates.
The ligand migration network for O2–diffusion in truncated Hemoglobin N is analyzed based on three different clustering schemes. For coordinate-based clustering, the conventional k–means and the kinetics-based Markov Clustering (MCL) methods are employed, whereas the locally scaled diffusion map (LSDMap) method is a collective-variable-based approach. It is found that all three methods agree well in their geometrical definition of the most important docking site, and all experimentally known docking sites are recovered by all three methods. Also, for most of the states, their population coincides quite favourably, whereas the kinetics of and between the states differs. One of the major differences between k–means and MCL clustering on the one hand and LSDMap on the other is that the latter finds one large primary cluster containing the Xe1a, IS1, and ENT states. This is related to the fact that the motion within the state occurs on similar time scales, whereas structurally the state is found to be quite diverse. In agreement with previous explicit atomistic simulations, the Xe3 pocket is found to be a highly dynamical site which points to its potential role as a hub in the network. This is also highlighted in the fact that LSDMap cannot identify this state. First passage time distributions from MCL clusterings using a one- (ligand-position) and two-dimensional (ligand-position and protein-structure) descriptor suggest that ligand- and protein-motions are coupled. The benefits and drawbacks of the three methods are discussed in a comparative fashion and highlight that depending on the questions at hand the best-performing method for a particular data set may differ.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.