Sulfidic off-odors as a result of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and low-molecular-weight thiols are commonly encountered in wine production. These odors are usually removed by the process of Cu(II) fining, a process that remains poorly understood. The present study aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms by which Cu(II) interacts with H2S and thiol compounds (RSH) under wine-like conditions. Copper complex formation was monitored along with H2S, thiol, oxygen, and acetaldehyde concentrations after the addition of Cu(II) (50 or 100 μM) to air-saturated model wine solutions containing H2S, cysteine, 6-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, or 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (300 μM each). The presence of H2S and thiols in excess to Cu(II) led to the rapid formation of ∼1.4:1 H2S/Cu and ∼2:1 thiol/Cu complexes, resulting in the oxidation of H2S and thiols and reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I), which reacted with oxygen. H2S was observed to initially oxidize rather than form insoluble copper sulfide. The proposed reaction mechanisms provide insight into the extent to which H2S can be selectively removed in the presence of thiols in wine.

Fermentation-derived volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) are undesirable in wine and are often remediated in a process known as copper fining. In the present study, the addition of Cu(II) to model and real wine systems containing hydrogen sulfide (HS) and thiols provided evidence for the generation of disulfides (disulfanes) and organic polysulfanes. Cu(II) fining of a white wine spiked with glutathione, HS, and methanethiol (MeSH) resulted in the generation of MeSH-glutathione disulfide and trisulfane. In the present study, the mechanisms underlying the interaction of HS and thiols with Cu(II) is discussed, and a prospective diagnostic test for releasing volatile sulfur compounds from their nonvolatile forms in wine is investigated. This test utilized a combination of reducing agents, metal chelators, and low-oxygen conditions to promote the release of HS and MeSH, at levels above their reported sensory thresholds, from red and white wines that were otherwise free of sulfidic off-odors at the time of addition.

Volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs), particularly low molecular weight sulfhydryls like hydrogen sulfide (HS) and methanethiol (MeSH), are often observed in wines with sulfurous off-aromas. Recent work has shown both HS and MeSH can increase up to a few µM (> 40 µg/L) during anoxic storage, but the identity of the latent sources of these sulfhydryls is still disputed. This review critically evaluates the latent precursors and pathways likely to be responsible for the loss and formation of these sulfhydryls during wine storage based on the existing enology literature as well as studies from food chemistry, geochemistry, biochemistry, and synthetic chemistry. We propose that three precursor classes have sufficient concentration and metastability to serve as latent sulfhydryl precursors in wine: 1) transition metal-sulfhydryl complexes, particularly those formed following Cu(II) addition, which are released under anoxic conditions through an unknown mechanism; 2) asymmetric disulfides, polysulfanes, and (di)organopolysulfanes formed through transition-metal mediated oxidation (e.g., Cu(II)) of sulfhydryls or pesticide degradation, and released through sulfitolysis, metal-catalyzed thiol-disulfide exchange or related reactions; 3) S-alkylthioacetates, primarily formed during fermentation, and releasable hydrolytically. Some evidence also exists for S-amino acids serving as precursors. Based on these findings, we propose a "decision tree" approach to choosing appropriate strategies for managing wines with sulfurous off-aromas.

Sulfidic off-odors arising during wine production are frequently removed by Cu(II) fining. In part 1 of this study ( 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00641 ), the reaction of H2S and thiols with Cu(II) was examined; however, the interaction of iron and copper is also known to play an important synergistic role in mediating non-enzymatic wine oxidation. The interaction of these two metals in the oxidation of H2S and thiols (cysteine, 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol, and 6-sulfanylhexan-1-ol) was therefore examined under wine-like conditions. H2S and thiols (300 μM) were reacted with Fe(III) (100 or 200 μM) alone and in combination with Cu(II) (25 or 50 μM), and concentrations of H2S and thiols, oxygen, and acetaldehyde were monitored over time. H2S and thiols were shown to be slowly oxidized in the presence of Fe(III) alone and were not bound to Fe(III) under model wine conditions. However, Cu(II) added to model wine containing Fe(III) was quickly reduced by H2S and thiols to form Cu(I) complexes, which then rapidly reduced Fe(III) to Fe(II). Oxidation of Fe(II) in the presence of oxygen regenerated Fe(III) and completed the iron redox cycle. In addition, sulfur-derived oxidation products were observed, and the formation of organic polysulfanes was demonstrated.

In the present study, the reaction between 1-hydroxyethyl radicals (1-HER) and various wine-related phenolics and thiols, including gallic acid, caffeic acid, ferulic acid, 3-mercaptohexan-1-ol (3MH), cysteine (Cys), and glutathione (GSH), was studied using competitive spin trapping with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and mass spectrometry. Previous studies have reported several important reactions occurring between quinones and other wine components, but the fate of 1-HER within the context of wine oxidation is less understood. Furthermore, the ability of these compounds to prevent formation of acetaldehyde, a known nonenzymatic oxidation product of ethanol, was measured. The hydroxycinnamic acids and thiol compounds tested at 5 mM concentrations significantly inhibited spin adduct formation, indicating their reactivity toward 1-HER. In addition, we confirm that loss of 3MH under model wine conditions is due to quinone trapping as well as 1-HER-induced oxidation.