The quality of physician-patient communication is a critical factor in treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction with care. To date, few studies have specifically conducted an in-depth evaluation of the effect of telemedicine (TM) on physician-patient communication in a medical setting. Our objective was to determine whether physical separation and technology used during TM have a negative effect on physician-patient communication. In this noninferiority randomized clinical trial, patients were randomized to receive a single consultation with one of 9 physicians, either in person (IP) or via TM. Patients (n = 221) were recruited from pulmonary, endocrine, and rheumatology clinics at a Midwestern Veterans Administration hospital. Physician-patient communication was measured using a validated self-report questionnaire consisting of 33 items measuring satisfaction with visit convenience and physician's patient-centered communication, clinical competence, and interpersonal skills. Satisfaction for physician's patient-centered communication was similar for both consultation types (TM = 3.76 versus IP = 3.61), and noninferiority of TM was confirmed (noninferiority t-test p = 0.002). Patient satisfaction with physician's clinical competence (TM = 4.63 versus IP = 4.52) and physician's interpersonal skills (TM = 4.79 versus IP = 4.74) were similar, and noninferiority of TM was confirmed (noninferiority t-test p = 0.006 and p = 0.04, respectively). Patients reported greater satisfaction with convenience for TM as compared to IP consultations (TM = 4.41 versus IP = 2.37, noninferiority t-test p < 0.001). Patients were equally satisfied with physician's ability to develop rapport, use shared decision making, and promote patient-centered communication during TM and IP consultations. Our data suggest that, despite physical separation, physician-patient communication during TM is not inferior to communication during IP consultations.
Among internists providing primary care at 4 VA medical centers, there were no significant differences between those with time-limited ABIM certification and those with time-unlimited ABIM certification on 10 primary care performance measures. Additional research to examine the difference in patient outcomes among holders of time-limited and time-unlimited certificates in non-VA and nonacademic settings and the association with other ABIM goals may help clarify the potential benefit of Maintenance of Certification participation.
The prevalence of exercise-induced asthma (ElA) was determined in a population of 12- and 13-year-old schoolchildren whose parents returned a questionnaire regarding a previous diagnosis of asthma, recent asthmatic symptoms and symptoms of allergic rhinitis. El A was defined as a >15% fall in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) following 6 min of free running in a gymnasium. Among the 201 children studied, 18 (8.9%) demonstrated El A. Of 21 children with symptomatic asthma in the 6 months prior to study, 9 (43%) developed El A compared to none of 6 children with asymptomatic asthma (p <0.0001). Among 48 children with a history of allergic rhinitis alone, 7 (14.6%) demonstrated El A. The mean postexercise changes in PEFR were 14.9% for 16 children with both asthma and allergic rhinitis, 6.4% among 48 children with allergic rhinitis only, and 1.8% among 125 normal children. Recent symptoms of asthma and a history of allergic rhinitis appeared to be risk factors for EIA. EIA was readily demonstrated in a gym class setting; the use of such screening may facilitate its diagnosis and treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.