The immune response of naive CD4 T cells to influenza virus is initiated in the draining lymph nodes and spleen, and only after effectors are generated do antigen-specific cells migrate to the lung which is the site of infection. The effector cells generated in secondary organs appear as multiple subsets which are a heterogeneous continuum of cells in terms of number of cell divisions, phenotype and function. The effector cells that migrate to the lung constitute the more differentiated of the total responding population, characterized by many cell divisions, loss of CD62L, down-regulation of CCR7, stable expression of CD44 and CD49d, and transient expression of CCR5 and CD25. These cells also secrete high levels of interferon γ and reduced levels of interleukin 2 relative to those in the secondary lymphoid organs. The response declines rapidly in parallel with viral clearance, but a spectrum of resting cell subsets reflecting the pattern at the peak of response is retained, suggesting that heterogeneous effector populations may give rise to corresponding memory populations. These results reveal a complex response, not an all-or-none one, which results in multiple effector phenotypes and implies that effector cells and the memory cells derived from them can display a broad spectrum of functional potentials.

The factors required for the generation of memory CD4 T cells remain unclear, and whether there is a continuing requirement for antigen stimulation is critical to design of vaccine strategies. CD4 effectors generated in vitro from naïve CD4 T cells of mice efficiently gave rise to small resting memory cells after transfer to class II-deficient hosts, indicating no requirement for further antigen or class II recognition.

We examined the expression and influence of IL-10 during influenza infection. We found that IL-10 does not impact sublethal infection, heterosubtypic immunity, or the maintenance of long-lived influenza Ag depots. However, IL-10-deficient mice display dramatically increased survival compared with wild-type mice when challenged with lethal doses of virus, correlating with increased expression of several Th17-associated cytokines in the lungs of IL-10-deficient mice during the peak of infection, but not with unchecked inflammation or with increased cellular responses. Foxp3− CD4 T cell effectors at the site of infection represent the most abundant source of IL-10 in wild-type mice during high-dose influenza infection, and the majority of these cells coproduce IFN-γ. Finally, compared with predominant Th1 responses in wild-type mice, virus-specific T cell responses in the absence of IL-10 display a strong Th17 component in addition to a strong Th1 response and we show that Th17-polarized CD4 T cell effectors can protect naive mice against an otherwise lethal influenza challenge and utilize unique mechanisms to do so. Our results show that IL-10 expression inhibits development of Th17 responses during influenza infection and that this is correlated with compromised protection during high-dose primary, but not secondary, challenge.

After transfer to adoptive hosts, in vitro–generated CD4 effectors can become long-lived memory cells, but the factors regulating this transition are unknown. We find that low doses of interleukin (IL) 7 enhance survival of effectors in vitro without driving their division. When in vitro–generated effectors are transferred to normal intact adoptive hosts, they survive and rapidly become small resting cells with a memory phenotype. CD4 effectors generated from wild-type versus IL-7 receptor−/− mice were transferred to adoptive hosts, including intact mice and those deficient in IL-7. In each case, the response to IL-7 was critical for good recovery of donor cells after 5–7 d. Recovery was also IL-7–dependent in Class II hosts where division was minimal. Blocking antibodies to IL-7 dramatically decreased short-term recovery of transferred effectors in vivo without affecting their division. These data indicate that IL-7 plays a critical role in promoting memory CD4 T cell generation by providing survival signals, which allow effectors to successfully become resting memory cells.

We have concentrated here on the lymphokines which might serve to regulate the different pathways of precursor development. We suggest that, as a result of antigenic stimulation, specific precursor cells both proliferate and become committed to develop into either an effector cell, a memory cell or an anergized cell. Anergy has not been dealt with in this review, but it is likely to be one of the options available. The development of an effector population takes 4-7 d (quite analogous to the time it takes for CTLp to become CTL and for resting B to become Ab-forming cells). The effector populations are large, generally IL-2R-positive cells. These cells have upregulated many adhesion molecule systems [e.g., Pgp-1, LFA-1 and ICAM-1 (Swain unpublished)], but downregulated the Mel-14 homing receptor. Effectors are ready to respond to APC such as specific B cells with a rapid synthesis and secretion of lymphokines. The effector population is then quickly downregulated, both by the turn off of lymphokine synthesis/secretion and possibly by its own suicide. This kind of pattern makes teleological sense since the cells making such high titers of lymphokines could have many potent pleitropic effects. It also seems to be the strategy employed in the generation of other terminally differentiated effectors (such as CTL and plasma cells). The requirement for restimulation and the requirement for direct and perhaps prolonged contact between the helper effector and the APC-B cell can be expected to help ensure that these lymphokines are localized (reviewed in Swain & Dutton 1987, Swain & Croft 1990) and effectively delivered to specific responding cells. We postulate that at the same time, or perhaps subsequent to this, another set of signals drives precursors to generate prememory cells. Our studies suggest these emerging memory cells may be phenotypically unique and we postulate that they are specialized to become a "long-lived" population of memory cells that will persist indefinitely as a protective population of increased frequency for the antigen encountered and which is also able to respond more rapidly and effectively. The greater effectiveness of the memory response would thus be due to dramatically increased frequency, to characteristic and stable changes in adhesion molecule expression and to the fact that, in addition to IL-2, resting memory cells also secrete at least low titers of IL-3, IL-4, IFN-gamma and other lymphokines upon initial restimulation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Inflammation induced by recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns dramatically impacts subsequent adaptive responses. We asked if the adaptive immune system can also affect the character and magnitude of innate inflammatory responses. We find that the response of memory, but not naïve, CD4+ T cells enhances production of multiple innate inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (IIC) in the lung, and that during influenza infection, this leads to early control of virus. Memory CD4+ T cell induced IIC and viral control require cognate antigen recognition and are optimal when memory cells are either T helper type 1 (TH1)- or TH17-polarized, but are independent of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) production and do not require activation of conserved pathogen recognition pathways. This represents a novel mechanism by which memory CD4+ T cells induce an early innate response that enhances immune protection against pathogens.

Whether memory T lymphocytes are derived directly from effector T cells or via a separately controlled pathway has long been debated. Here we present evidence that, after adoptive transfer, a large fraction of in vitro--derived effector CD4(+) T cells have the potential to become memory T cells and that this transition can occur without further division. This data supports a linear pathway from effector to memory cells and suggests that most properties of memory cells are predetermined during effector generation. We suggest, therefore, that evaluation of vaccine efficacy in the induction of memory CD4(+) T cells should focus on the effector stage.

SummaryWe have outlined the carefully orchestrated process of CD4 + T-cell differentiation from naïve to effector and from effector to memory cells with a focus on how these processes can be studied in vivo in responses to pathogen infection. We emphasize that the regulatory factors that determine the quality and quantity of the effector and memory cells generated include (i) the antigen dose during the initial T-cell interaction with antigen-presenting cells; (ii) the dose and duration of repeated interactions; and (iii) the milieu of inflammatory and growth cytokines that responding CD4 + T cells encounter. We suggest that heterogeneity in these regulatory factors leads to the generation of a spectrum of effectors with different functional attributes. Furthermore, we suggest that it is the presence of effectors at different stages along a pathway of progressive linear differentiation that leads to a related spectrum of memory cells. Our studies particularly highlight the multi-faceted roles of CD4 + effector and memory T cells in protective responses to influenza infection and support the concept that efficient priming of CD4 + T cells that react to shared influenza proteins could contribute greatly to vaccine strategies for influenza. Overview and historyOver the past decade, others and we have concluded that naïve precursor T cells must undergo many steps of division and differentiation before they acquire the effector functions necessary for their many regulatory activities (1). One of these activities is 'help' for B cells, which promotes B-cell isotype switching, somatic mutation, and differentiation in germinal centers to plasma cells and memory cells (2-4). Another key regulatory activity carried out by CD4 + T cells involves help for naïve CD8 + T cells to promote their optimum differentiation into cytotoxic effectors and memory cells and to support their maintenance (5-7). In addition, there are a host of other regulatory effects of CD4 + effectors on macrophages as well as other antigenpresenting cells (APCs). These CD4 + T-cell functions are mediated by surface coreceptors on the effector cells, including CD40L, CD28, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, etc., that interact with receptors on B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, or other APCs, and by potent cytokines secreted by the CD4 + effectors upon recognition of antigen on APCs.CD4 + T-cell effectors represent a collection of distinct subsets characterized in part by their abilities to produce different patterns of cytokines. The two best characterized subsets are designated T-helper 1 (Th1), producing interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and Th2, producing interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, and IL-13 as 'signature' cytokines. Recently, evidence has accumulated for a third . Most probably the APCs that stimulate the naïve CD4 + T cells are also the initial source of cytokines that imprint these subsets in situ (11). It is also increasingly accepted that the polarizing cytokines secreted by the APCs are dictated by the context of the antigen, be it from a pathogen or...