It is useful to begin with some immutable facts: Julius and Ethel Rosenberg died on the electric chair at Sing Sing Prison on Friday, 19 June 1953, and were pronounced dead at 8∶06 and 8∶17 p.m., respectively. Nearly seventeen years later, on 23 April 1970, Donald Freed's Inquest opened at the Music Box Theatre in New York City. The play about the Rosenberg case ran for eight previews and twenty-eight performances, closing just twenty-three days after its premiere. In its first minutes, Inquest alerted the audience that “every word you will hear or see on this stage is a documented quotation or reconstruction from events.” Freed asserts that he used only primary sources, no matter how “bizarre or poisoned” the words might have seemed, to construct his script. He employed these sources in three distinct ways and, accordingly, called for a divided stage to present the play. In Stage A, the players enacted portions of the 1951–3 court transcripts, whereas Stage B served as a plastic space, where flashback scenes of the characters' out-of-trial lives, pieced from letters, tapes, memos, and other available archival sources, interrupted the legal proceedings. Finally, relying on a large, partitioned screen situated upstage and on voice-over recordings, Freed assembled photographs, newspaper headlines, visual evidence submitted in the courtroom, and quotations from public figures to comment on the Rosenberg saga. The playwright thus toyed with time and place, offering the central story of the trial in a nonlinear manner. He bombarded the audience with projections and sounds to reinforce the reality on which the play was based and, at the same time, to evoke a nightmarish, multimedia world.
Immigration issues carry multiple opportunities and problems that manifest differently for a number of groups, creating tension, inspiring passion, and thus rendering these issues politically difficult. As people move across borders into the United States, legal frameworks divide individuals into reductive categories of documented immigrants and undocumented non-citizens. In his first book, Gad Guterman, Head of the Theatre Studies and Dramaturgy Program at the Conservatory Theatre of Arts at Webster University, provides a detailed discursive analysis of theatrical works to illustrate how legal language defines the identity of those dealing with situations of undocumentedness. Guterman has spent nearly 20 years writing, directing and teaching theatre, focusing on relationships between theater and the law. The object of analysis in this book is a "theater of undocumentedness," a theatre movement with many historical antecedents that has been circulating through small playhouses in border cities, Chicago and New York City since 2006. He addresses a number of the more well-known pieces by Josefina López, Culture Clash, Arthur Miller and Michael John Gárces, among others that he considers to fit into the theatre of undocumentedness. In order to analyze these theatrical depictions of "border scenarios," Guterman focuses on plays depicting the tenuous nature of immigrant status in the United States, both from an individual and collective perspective. While Guterman addresses plays that describe terrible instances of injustice, oppression, and violence towards those with undocumented status, he points out that most of the plays he reviews focus mainly on the powerful and hopeful stories of immigrants who "overcome" their illegal status in order to live as a "normal" juridical subjects in the U.S. legal system. For example, he relates the plot of Real Women have Curves, a 1987 play by Josefina López, about a group of women in a textile factory in East Los Angeles told by Ana, the teenaged protagonist. Ana is a documented citizen, but her family and the community she interacts with are not. The story, Guterman maintains, is intended to access notions of class and gendered wage labor, along with the way women must carefully craft their identities in order to evade the ever-watchful gaze of immigration police and those that might report them to the immigration police. At the same time, he claims that the plot breaks with reductive stereotypes associated with undocumented laborers by portraying nuanced characters in complex situations. Despite Ana's struggles with a low-wage job, family, and body issues that are particularly harsh for women of color, her confidence and resolve are compelling. Guterman argues that one of the more memorable scenes takes place when Ana strips to her underwear in the sweltering
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.