The standard of care for treatment of glioblastoma results in a mean survival of only 12 to 15 months. Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is an investigational therapy to treat glioblastoma that utilizes locoregional drug delivery via a small-caliber catheter placed into the brain parenchyma. Clinical trials have failed to reach their endpoints due to an inability of standard catheters to fully saturate the entire brain tumor and its margins. In this study, we examine the effects of controlled catheter movement on dye dispersal volume in agarose gel brain tissue phantoms. Four different catheter movement control protocols (stationary, continuous retraction, continuous insertion, and intermittent insertion) were applied for a single-port stepped catheter capable of intrainfusion movement. Infusions of indigo carmine dye into agarose gel brain tissue phantoms were conducted during the controlled catheter movement. The dispersal volume (Vd), forward dispersal volume (Vdf), infusion radius, backflow distance, and forward flow distance were quantified for each catheter movement protocol using optical images recorded throughout the experiment. Vd and Vdf for the retraction and intermittent insertion groups were significantly higher than the stationary group. The stationary group had a small but significantly larger infusion radius than either the retracting or the intermittent insertion groups. The stationary group had a greater backflow distance and lower forward flow distance than either the retraction or the intermittent insertion groups. Continuous retraction of catheters during CED treatments can result in larger Vd than traditional stationary catheters, which may be useful for improving the outcomes of CED treatment of glioblastoma. However, catheter design will be crucial in preventing backflow of infusate up the needle tract, which could significantly alter both the Vd and shape of the infusion.
Glioblastoma has a 5 year survival of only 5.5% and a median patient survival of 12 to 15 months even with gold standard treatment. One potential method of improving treatment of glioblastoma is the use of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) which utilizes local delivery of therapeutics to the brain. However, clinical trials have shown an inability of standard catheters to deliver therapeutics to the entire target area. In this study, we explore the potential of controlled catheter movement to increase the volume dispersed (Vd) of indigo carmine dye in agarose gel brain tissue phantoms. We use four catheter control protocols: stationary, continuous retraction, continuous insertion, and intermittent insertion using a single port stepped catheter. The continuous retraction group resulted in consistent catheter clogging caused by the continued insertion of the catheter and therefore was removed from further analysis. Vd and backflow distance was quantified for all other catheter movement protocols using optical images captured throughout the infusion. Catheter retraction resulted in an increase in Vd of 51% while intermittent insertion resulted in a Vd increase of 24% compared to the stationary catheter. Additionally, a 37% reduction in backflow distance was seen with the retracting catheter when compared to the stationary catheter. These results are further supported by a simplified computational model that we have created. The computational model simulates the infusion of indigo carmine dye through an agarose gel brain tissue phantom and shows an increase in Vd of over 100% with catheter retraction. The increased Vd and decreased backflow distance afforded by the retracting catheter, suggests that the use of catheter movement may be a useful technique in increasing drug dispersal in tumorous tissue. Additional work in live and excised tissue should be conducted to confirm these results and an exploration of optimal needle movement protocols is necessary.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.