No abstract

Superficial vascular lesions are a common dermatological diagnosis but are often difficult to treat. Numerous lasers (especially the dye laser) and intense pulsed light sources have been used, but there have been very few reports on the effectiveness of the potassium-titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser. We have extensive experience of this modality at our institution, and the purpose of this survey is to report on the safety and efficacy of the KTP laser. Using an in-house database, we retrospectively collected data from patients who had undergone treatment with the KTP laser for superficial vascular lesions. Patients of Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV were included. Exclusion criteria were Fitzpatrick skin type V, patients with obvious suntan and those on potentially phototoxic medications or minocycline therapy. Diagnoses included discrete or matted telangiectasia, strawberry naevus, spider angioma, rosaceal erythema, rosaceal telangiectasia, telangiectatic naevus, angioma, combined rosaceal erythema/telangiectasia, port-wine stain, venous lake haemangioma and hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Patients underwent an initial test treatment and further treatment at 6-week intervals as required. Clinical photographs were taken pre- and post-treatment, and outcome was graded by patient and physician. Adverse effects were recorded including scarring, hypo- or hyperpigmentation, marked swelling, blistering, scabbing and bruising. Six hundred forty-seven patients with 13 diagnoses on 9 different body sites were recorded. Four hundred eighty-six were female, and the median age was 39.5 years. Of the lesions treated, 33.7 % (n = 218) were discrete telangiectases and 31.8 % (n = 206) were spider angiomas. A 92.7 % of lesions were on the face. Four hundred thirteen (77.6 %) patients who had outcomes recorded at 6 weeks were graded as "clearance" or "marked improvement". Only 38 (5.8 %) patients experienced adverse effects, all of which were minor; the main adverse effect was swelling. Unlike the dye laser, there was only one case of bruising out of 647 patients. This is the largest survey of patients to have undergone KTP laser treatment reported in the literature. Our results show that the KTP laser is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of superficial vascular lesions.

ImportanceDrug survival of biologic therapies for psoriasis is a proxy for longer-term treatment effectiveness and safety. Patient factors that are associated with the survival of each biologic differently (effect modifiers) may inform the decision to choose between biologics.ObjectiveTo assess the drug survival associated with the effectiveness and safety of commonly used biologics for psoriasis in the UK and Ireland and identify effect modifiers for these biologics and their survival.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsWe conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with psoriasis using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) between November 2007 and August 2021.ExposuresAdalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, ixekizumab.Main Outcomes and MeasuresWe conducted a survival analysis and fitted separate flexible parametric models for drug survival as a proxy for effectiveness and safety.ResultsA total of 16 122 treatment courses were included: 6607 (41.0%) in which treatment with adalimumab was initiated, 5405 (33.5%) with ustekinumab, 2677 (16.6%) with secukinumab, 730 (4.5%) with guselkumab, and 703 (4.4%) with ixekizumab. The crude survival functions at year 1 for measures of effectiveness for treatment with adalimumab was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80-0.82), 0.89 for ustekinumab (95% CI, 0.88-0.89), 0.86 for secukinumab (95% CI, 0.85-0.87), 0.94 for guselkumab (95% CI, 0.92-0.96), and 0.86 for ixekizumab (95% CI, 0.83-0.89). The adjusted survival curves from the multivariable model for effectiveness showed that treatment with guselkumab had the higher survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56) and adalimumab had the lower survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.03-2.76) compared with ustekinumab. Secukinumab and ixekizumab had similar survival curves over time. Psoriatic arthritis, previous biologic exposure, nail involvement, and ethnicity were effect modifiers for survival in association with treatment effectiveness. The crude survival functions at year 1 for safety were 0.91 for treatment with adalimumab (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), 0.94 for ustekinumab (95% CI, 0.94-0.95), 0.94 for secukinumab (95% CI, 0.92-0.94), 0.96 for guselkumab (95% CI, 0.94-0.98), and 0.92 for ixekizumab (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). Guselkumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab had similar adjusted survival curves for safety, while adalimumab (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.46-1.89) and ixekizumab (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.13-2.03) had lower survival compared with ustekinumab.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cohort study suggest that guselkumab had the highest drug survival in BADBIR of the included biologics for treatment persistence that was associated with effectiveness, and guselkumab had highest drug survival for safety compared with other biologics except ustekinumab. Psoriatic arthritis, nail involvement, previous biologic exposure, and ethnicity were effect modifiers for biologics and their survival in association with treatment effectiveness. This information on longer-term treatment persistence, safety, and tolerability may help patients and their clinicians make an informed decision to initiate treatment with a biologic therapy.

; for the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) Study Group and the Psoriasis Stratification to Optimise Relevant Therapy (PSORT) Consortium IMPORTANCE High-cost biologic therapies have transformed the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. To optimize outcomes and reduce costs, dose adjustment informed by measurement of circulating drug levels has been shown to be effective in various settings. However, limited evidence exists for this approach with the interleukin 12 and interleukin 23 inhibitor ustekinumab. OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective observational cohort of 491 adults with psoriasis was recruited to the multicenter Biomarkers of Systemic Treatment Outcomes in Psoriasis study within the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic and Immunomodulators Register from June 2009 to December 2017; samples from some patients were taken between 2009 and 2011 as part of a pilot study with the same inclusion criteria. EXPOSURE Serum ustekinumab level measured at any point during the dosing cycle using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Disease activity measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score. Treatment response outcomes were PASI75 (75% reduction in PASI score from baseline [primary outcome]), PASI90 (90% reduction of PASI score from baseline), and absolute PASI score of 1.5 or less. RESULTS A total of 491 patients (171 women and 320 men; mean [SD] age, 45.7 [12.8] years) had 1 or more serum samples (total, 853 samples obtained 0-56 weeks from start of treatment) and 1 or more PASI scores within the first year of treatment. Antidrug antibodies were detected in only 17 of 490 patients (3.5%). Early measured drug levels (1-12 weeks after starting treatment) were associated with PASI75 response 6 months after starting treatment (odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71) when adjusted for baseline PASI score, age, and ustekinumab dose. However, this finding was not consistent across the other PASI outcomes (PASI90 and PASI score of Յ1.5). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This real-world study provides evidence that measurement of early serum ustekinumab levels could be useful to direct the treatment strategy for psoriasis. Adequate drug exposure early in the treatment cycle may be particularly important in determining clinical outcome.