In this paper we analyze the efficiency of various search results diversification methods. While efficacy of diversification approaches has been deeply investigated in the past, response time and scalability issues have been rarely addressed. A unified framework for studying performance and feasibility of result diversification solutions is thus proposed. First we define a new methodology for detecting when, and how, query results need to be diversified. To this purpose, we rely on the concept of "query refinement" to estimate the probability of a query to be ambiguous. Then, relying on this novel ambiguity detection method, we deploy and compare on a standard test set, three different diversification methods: IASelect, xQuAD, and OptSelect. While the first two are recent state-of-the-art proposals, the latter is an original algorithm introduced in this paper. We evaluate both the efficiency and the effectiveness of our approach against its competitors by using the standard TREC Web diversification track testbed. Results shown that OptSelect is able to run two orders of magnitude faster than the two other state-of-the-art approaches and to obtain comparable figures in diversification effectiveness.
Learning-to-Rank (LtR) techniques leverage machine learning algorithms and large amounts of training data to induce high-quality ranking functions. Given a set of documents and a user query, these functions are able to precisely predict a score for each of the documents, in turn exploited to effectively rank them.Although the scoring efficiency of LtR models is critical in several applications -e.g., it directly impacts on response time and throughput of Web query processing -it has received relatively little attention so far.The goal of this work is to experimentally investigate the scoring efficiency of LtR models along with their ranking quality. Specifically, we show that machine-learned ranking models exhibit a quality versus efficiency trade-off. For example, each family of LtR algorithms has tuning parameters that can influence both effectiveness and efficiency, where higher ranking quality is generally obtained with more complex and expensive models. Moreover, LtR algorithms that learn complex models, such as those based on forests of regression trees, are generally more expensive and more effective than other algorithms that induce simpler models like linear combination of features.We extensively analyze the quality versus efficiency trade-off of a wide spectrum of state-of-the-art LtR, and we propose a sound methodology to devise the most effective ranker given a time budget. To guarantee reproducibility, we used publicly available datasets and we contribute an open source C++ framework providing optimized, multi-threaded implementations of the most effective tree-based learners: Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT), Lambda-Mart (λ-MART), and the first public-domain implementation of Oblivious Lambda-Mart (Ω λ -MART), an algorithm that induces forests of oblivious regression trees.We investigate how the different training parameters impact on the quality versus efficiency trade-off, and provide a thorough comparison of several algorithms in the quality-cost space. The experiments conducted show that there is not an overall best algorithm, but the optimal choice depends on the time budget.
This paper proposes a novel schedule-based approach for scheduling a continuous stream of batch jobs on the machines of a computational Grid. Our new solutions represented by dispatching rule Earliest GapEarliest Deadline First (EG-EDF) and Tabu search are based on the idea of filling gaps in the existing schedule. EG-EDF rule is able to build the schedule for all jobs incrementally by applying technique which fills earliest existing gaps in the schedule with newly arriving jobs. If no gap for a coming job is available EG-EDF rule uses Earliest Deadline First (EDF) strategy for including new job into the existing schedule. Such schedule is then optimized using the Tabu search algorithm moving jobs into earliest gaps again. Scheduling choices are taken to meet the Quality of Service (QoS) requested by the submitted jobs, and to optimize the usage of hardware resources. We compared the proposed solution with some of the most common queue-based scheduling algorithms like FCFS, EASY backfilling, and Flexible backfilling. Experiments shows that EG-EDF rule is able to compute good assignments, often with shorter algorithm runtime w.r.t. the other queue-based algorithms. Further Tabu search optimization results in higher QoS and machine usage while keeping the algorithm runtime reasonable.
In this paper, we propose a new method, called Convergent Scheduling, for scheduling a continuous stream of batch jobs on the machines of large-scale computing farms. This method exploits a set of heuristics that guide the scheduler in making decisions. Each heuristics manages a specific problem constraint, and contributes to carry out a value that measures the degree of matching between a job and a machine. Scheduling choices are taken to meet the QoS requested by the submitted jobs, and optimizing the usage of hardware and software resources. We compared it with some of the most common job scheduling algorithms, i.e. Backfilling, and Earliest Deadline First. Convergent Scheduling is able to compute good assignments, while being a simple and modular algorithm.
In this paper, we propose a new multi-criteria job scheduler for scheduling a continuous stream of batch jobs on large-scale computing farms. Our solution, called Convergent Scheduler, exploits a set of heuristics that drives the scheduler in taking decisions. Each heuristics manages a specific problem constraint, and contributes to compute a value that measures the degree of matching between a job and a machine. Scheduling choices are taken both to meet the Quality of Service requested by the submitted jobs and to optimize the usage of software and hardware resources. In order to validate the scheduler we propose, it has been compared versus two common job scheduling algorithms: Easy and Flexible backfilling. Convergent Scheduler demonstrated to be able to compute good assignments that allow a better exploitation of resources with respect to the other algorithms. Moreover, it has a simple modular structure that makes simple its extension and customization to meet the service goal of an installation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.