(1) Background: The correlation between titers of islet autoantibodies (IAbs) and the loss of transplanted islets remains controversial. We sought to evaluate the prognostic utility of monitoring IAbs in diabetic patients after islet transplantation (ITx); (2) Methods: Twelve patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus and severe hypoglycemia underwent ITx. Serum concentration of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), insulinoma antigen 2 (IA-2), and zinc transport 8 (ZnT8) autoantibodies was assessed before ITx and 0, 7, and 75 days and every 3 months post-operatively; (3) Results: IA-2A (IA-2 antibody) and ZnT8A (ZnT8 antibody) levels were not detectable before or after ITx in all patients (median follow-up of 53 months (range 24–61)). Prior to ITx, GAD antibody (GADA) was undetectable in 67% (8/12) of patients. Of those, 75% (6/8) converted to GADA+ after ITx. In 67% (4/6) of patients with GADA+ seroconversion, GADA level peaked within 3 months after ITx and subsequently declined. All patients with GADA+ seroconversion maintained long-term partial or complete islet function (insulin independence) after 1 or 2 ITx. There was no correlation between the presence of IAb-associated HLA haplotypes and the presence of IAbs before or after ITx; (4) Conclusions: There is no association between serum GADA trends and ITx outcomes. IA-2A and ZnT8A were not detectable in any of our patients before or after ITx.
A recent randomized, multicenter trial did not show benefit of a CXCR1/2 receptor inhibitor (Reparixin) when analysis included marginal islet mass (>3,000 IEQ/kg) for allotransplantation and when immunosuppression regimens were not standardized among participating centers. We present a post-hoc analysis of trial patients from our center at the University of Chicago who received an islet mass of over 5,000 IEQ/kg and a standardized immunosuppression regimen of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction. Twelve islet allotransplantation (ITx) recipients were randomized (2:1) to receive Reparixin ( N = 8) or placebo ( N = 4) in accordance with the multicenter trial protocol. Pancreas and donor characteristics did not differ between Reparixin and placebo groups. Five (62.5%) patients who received Reparixin, compared to none in the placebo group, achieved insulin independence after only one islet infusion and remained insulin-free for over 2 years ( P = 0.08). Following the first ITx with ATG induction, distinct cytokine, chemokine, and miR-375 release profiles were observed for both the Reparixin and placebo groups. After excluding procedures with complications, islet engraftment on post-operative day 75 after a single transplant was higher in the Reparixin group ( n = 7) than in the placebo ( n = 3) group ( P = 0.03) when islet graft function was measured by the ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) for c-peptide to glucose in mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Additionally, the rate of engraftment was higher when determined via BETA-2 score instead of MMTT ( P = 0.01). Our analysis suggests that Reparixin may have improved outcomes compared to placebo when sufficient islet mass is transplanted and when standardized immunosuppression with ATG is used for induction. However, further studies are warranted. Investigation of Reparixin and other novel agents under more standardized and optimized conditions would help exclude confounding factors and allow for a more definitive evaluation of their role in improving outcomes in islet transplantation. Clinical trial reg. no. NCT01817959, clinicaltrials.gov
In 2008, Westermark et al. postulated that amyloid depositions found in allotransplanted islets derived from either islet overstimulation due to insulin production (as in type 2 diabetes), toxicity of immunosuppression, or perhaps both. 1 Amyloid depositions may promote a gradual decline in islet mass, progressive dysfunction, and ultimate
Introduction: After the first-in-human pilot study which showed safety of the pre-vascularized Sernova Cell Pouch (SCP) in the subcutaneous space, we modified islet transplantation (ITx) conditions for improved engraftment in the SCP. Methods: Two sets of the SCP were implanted in the abdominal anterior rectus sheath in seven patients with longstanding type 1 diabetes mellitus, problematic hypoglycemia and no stimulated C-peptide. Only highly purified islets were used for ITx and islets were suspended in the patient's own serum. Immunosuppression was initiated 1 month later followed by a marginal dose ITx after another month. Small sentinel SCPs were explanted for histopathological evaluation 3 months after each ITx. Results: Seven patients were submitted to 21 study related surgeries with a wound infection in 2 patients after SCP implantation with only one patient requiring device excision. The first subject presented with persistent stimulated serum C-peptide at 6 months after 1st and 2nd ITx into SCP. After 2nd ITx, glucose control improved substantially including reaching optimal target values for CGM with only 5% of Time Below Range (TBR). Subsequent intraportal ITx allowed for insulin independence currently maintained for over 15 months. The second patient at 3 months after 2nd ITx had positive stimulated serum C-peptide (0.48 ng/mL) with reduction of HbA1c from 10.6% to 7.6%, decreased insulin requirement from 49 to 28 u/day, improved CGM with TBR <4%, and reduction in Time Above Range (TAR) from 76% to 48%. To date, stimulated C-peptide has been detected for over 9 months. Three additional patients recently received ITx and await evaluation. Conclusion: Persistent islet graft function with sustained blood levels of C-peptide, reduction of HbA1c, improved CGM parameters, reduction of SHEs, and decreased total daily insulin requirement was achieved in the first 2 patients after ITx into SCPs implanted into abdominal wall. Significantly improved islet engraftment and clinical outcomes occurred using a modified approach for ITx into SCP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.