Adrenal response to iv administration of 1-24 ACTH (250 micrograms) was examined in normal volunteers under various conditions. The effect of basal cortisol levels was examined by performing the tests at 0800 h with and without pretreatment with dexamethasone. The effect of time of day was evaluated by performing the tests at 0800 h and at 1600 h, eliminating possible basal cortisol influence by pretreatment with dexamethasone. In the first set of tests, despite significantly different baseline levels, 30-min cortisol levels were not different (618 +/- 50 vs. 590 +/- 52 nmol/L). Afternoon cortisol levels in response to ACTH were found to be significantly higher than morning levels at 5 min (254 +/- 50 vs. 144 +/- 36 nmol/L, p less than 0.01) and at 15 min (541 +/- 61 vs. 433 +/- 52 nmol/L, p less than 0.02). This difference in response was no longer notable at 30 min (629 +/- 52 and 591 +/- 52 nmol/L). We tried also to determine the lowest ACTH dose which will elicit a maximal cortisol response. No difference was found in cortisol levels at 30 and 60 min in response to 250 and 5 micrograms 1-24 ACTH. Using 1 micrograms ACTH, the 30-min response did not differ from that to 250 micrograms (704 +/- 72 vs. 718 +/- 55 nmol/L, respectively). However, the 60-min response to 1 microgram was significantly lower (549 +/- 61 vs. 842 +/- 110 nmol/L, p less than 0.01). Using this low dose ACTH test (1 microgram, measuring 30-min cortisol level), we were able to develop a much more sensitive ACTH test, which enabled us to differentiate a subgroup of patients on long-term steroid treatment who responded normally to the regular 250 micrograms test, but had a reduced response to 1 microgram. The stability of 1-24 ACTH in saline solution, kept at 4 C, was checked. ACTH was found to be fully stable after 2 hs in a concentration of 5 micrograms/ml in glass tube and 0.5 micrograms/ml in plastic tube. It was also found to be fully stable, both immunologically and biologically, for 4 months, under these conditions. We conclude that the 30-min cortisol response to ACTH is constant, unrelated to basal cortisol level or time of day. It is therefore the best criterion for measuring adrenal response in the short ACTH test. The higher afternoon responses at 5 and 15 min suggest greater adrenal sensitivity in the afternoon, but further studies are needed to clarify this issue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

There are many suggestions in the literature that the adrenal gland is more sensitive to ACTH in the evening than in the morning. However, all these studies in humans were conducted when the basal cortisol level was not suppressed, and were based on the observation that, after stimulation, the increases in cortisol differed, though the peak values were the same. To examine this, we established the lowest ACTH dose that caused a maximal cortisol stimulation even when the basal cortisol was suppressed, and used a smaller dose of ACTH for morning and evening stimulation. The lowest ACTH dose to achieve maximal stimulation was found to be 1.0 mg, with which dose cortisol concentration increased to 607.2 Ϯ 182 nmol/l, compared with 612.7 Ϯ 140.8 nmol/l with the 250 mg test (P > 0.3). The use of smaller doses of ACTH (0.8 and 0.6 mg) achieved significantly lower cortisol responses ( 312 Ϯ 179.4 and 323 Ϯ 157.3 nmol/l respectively; both P < 0.01 compared with the 1 mg test). When a submaximal ACTH dose (0.6 mg) was used to stimulate the adrenal at 0800 and 1600 h, after pretreatment with dexamethasone, no difference in response was noted at either 15 min (372.6 Ϯ 116 compared with 394.7 Ϯ 129.7 nmol/l) or 30 min (397.4 Ϯ 176.6 compared with 403 Ϯ 226.3 nmol/l; P > 0.3 for both times). These results show that 1.0 mg ACTH, used latterly as a low-dose test, is very potent in stimulating the adrenal, even when baseline cortisol is suppressed; smaller doses cause reduction of this potency. Our data show that there is probably no diurnal variation in the response of the adrenal to ACTH, if one eliminates the influence of the basal cortisol level and uses physiologic rather than superphysiologic stimuli.

No abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the use of low-dose ACTH-(1-24) stimulation for assessment of adrenal function and the detection of mild adrenal insufficiency. The criteria for normal response to ACTH-(1-24) are a peak cortisol level of more than 500 nmol/L (18.1 micrograms/dL) and an increment of the cortisol level above the basal one of more than 200 nmol/L (7.2 micrograms/dL). These criteria were satisfied by 32 of 33 healthy children and adults subjected to an ACTH-(1-24) dose 500 times lower (0.5 micrograms/1.73 m2) than the dose of 250 micrograms in the standard test. At 20 min, the peak cortisol level was the same in the low-dose test [(621 +/- 28 nmol/L) (22.5 +/- 1.0 microgram/dL)] as in the standard ACTH test [(654 +/- 31 nmol/L) (23.7 +/- 1.1 microgram/dL)]. Of 46 asthmatic patients who had been treated with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (482 +/- 42 micrograms/m2 daily; n = 32) or budesonide (507 +/- 62 micrograms/m2 daily; n = 14) for over 6 months, 16 (35%) failed to reach a cortisol peak of more than 500 nmol/L (18.1 micrograms/dL) following stimulation with 0.5 micrograms ACTH-(1-24)/1.73 m2. Of these, 11 (24%) showed a cortisol increment of less than 200 nmol/L (7.2 micrograms/dL). These 16 patients, showing insufficient response to low-dose ACTH-(1-24), also had a significantly lower (P < 0.01) mean 24-h urinary free cortisol excretion [(71 +/- 10 nmol/m2.24 h) (25.7 +/- 3.6 micrograms/m2.24 h)] than patients who responded normally [(118 +/- 11 nmol/m2.24 h) (42.8 +/- 4.0 micrograms/m2.24 h). Nonetheless, all but one of the poor responders to a 0.5 microgram ACTH showed normal stimulation with the standard 250 micrograms ACTH test. Therefore, it appears that a low-dose ACTH test is capable of revealing mild adrenal insufficiency, which is not detected by the standard high-dose ACTH test.