Considering that the movements of complex system entities take place on continuous, but non-differentiable, curves, concepts, like non-differentiable entropy, informational non-differentiable entropy and informational non-differentiable energy, are introduced.First of all, the dynamics equations of the complex system entities (Schrödinger-type or fractal hydrodynamic-type) are obtained. The last one gives a specific fractal potential, which generates uncertainty relations through non-differentiable entropy. Next, the correlation between informational non-differentiable entropy and informational non-differentiable energy implies specific uncertainty relations through a maximization principle of the informational non-differentiable entropy and for a constant value of the informational non-differentiable energy. Finally, for a harmonic oscillator, the constant value of the informational non-differentiable energy is equivalent to a quantification condition. Keywords:non-differentiable entropy; informational non-differentiable entropy; informational non-differentiable energy; uncertainty relations Entropy 2014, 16 6043

No abstract

No abstract

Starting from the morphological-functional assumption of the fractal brain, a mathematical model is given by activating brain's non-differentiable dynamics through the determinism-nondeterminism inference of the responsible mechanisms. The postulation of a scale covariance principle in Schrödinger's type representation of the brain geodesics implies the spectral functionality of the brain dynamics through mechanisms of tunelling, percolation etc., while in the hydrodynamical type representation, it implies their structural functionality through mechanisms of wave schock, solitons type etc. For external constraints proportional with the states density, the fluctuations of the brain stationary dynamics activate both the spectral neuronal networks and the structural ones through a mapping principle of two distinct classes of cnoidal oscillation modes. The spectral-structural compatibility of the neuronal networks generates the communication codes of algebraic type, while the same compatibility on the solitonic component induces a strange topology (the direct product of the spectral topology and the structural one) that is responsible of the quadruple law (for instance, the nucleotide base from the human DNA structure). Implications in the elucidation of some neuropsychological mechanisms (memory's location and functioning, dementia etc.) are also presented.

Progress in neuroscience has left a central question of psychism unanswered: what is consciousness? Modeling the psyche from a computational perspective has helped to develop cognitive neurosciences, but it has also shown their limits, of which the definition, description and functioning of consciousness remain essential. From Rene Descartes, who tackled the issue of psychism as the brain-mind dualism, to Chambers, who defined qualia as the tough, difficult problem of research in neuroscience, many hypotheses and theories have been issued to encompass the phenomenon of consciousness. Neuroscience specialists, such as Giulio Tononi or David Eagleman, consider consciousness as a phenomenon of emergence of all processes that take place in the brain. This hypothesis has the advantage of being supported by progress made in the study of complex systems in which the issue of emergence can be mathematically formalized and analyzed by physical-mathematical models. The current tendency to associate neural networks within the broad scope of network science also allows for a physical-mathematical formalization of phenomenology in neural networks and the construction of information-symbolic models. The extrapolation of emergence at the level of physical systems, biological systems and psychic systems can bring new models that can also be applied to the concept of consciousness. The meaning and significance that seem to structure the nature of consciousness is found as direction of evolution and teleological finality, of integration in the whole system and in any complex system at all scales. Starting from the wave-corpuscle duality in quantum physics, we can propose a model for structuring reality, based on the emergence of systems that contribute to the integration and coherence of the entire reality. Physical-mathematical models based mainly on (mereo)topology can provide a mathematical formalization path, and the paradigm of information could allow the development of a pattern of emergence, that is common to all systems, including the psychic system, the difference being given only by the degree of information complexity. Thus, the mind-brain duality, which has been dominating the representation on psychism for a few centuries, could be solved by an informational approach, describing the connection between object and subject, reality and human consciousness, between mind and brain, thus unifying the perspective on natural sciences and humanities.

In this paper, we aim at an exercise that is transdisciplinary, involving science and religion, and interdisciplinary, involving disciplines and theories which appeared in the second half of the 20th century (e.g., topology, chaos theory, fractal geometry, non-linear dynamics, all of which can be found in the theory of complex systems). The latter required the reformulation of quantum mechanics theories starting with the beginning of the century, based on the substance-energy-information triangle. We focus on information and we also attempt a transdisciplinary approach to the imaginary from a psychological - physical - mathematical perspective, but the religious perspectives find their place along with the philosophical or even philological vision

No abstract

From the Hindu Vedas and the ancient Greek philosophy to the modern transdisciplinary vision and complex thought are solid proofs that the identification of the truly indivisible, ultimate particle. Science has reached nowadays the frontiers of metaphysics, and quantum physics, the levels of reality, the fractals, the holographic universe, the standard model of cosmology, etc. cause human beings to ask themselves again the questions that science cannot answer: Where do we come from? Who are we? Where are we going?