Estrogen in females is conventionally considered a cardioprotective influence, but a role for estrogen in male cardioprotection has yet to be defined. Estrogen biosynthesis from testosterone is regulated by aromatase. Aromatase has recently been shown to be expressed in the adult heart, although little is known about its involvement in the regulation of myocardial function and stress responses. The goal of this study was to determine whether upregulation of tissue aromatase expression could improve ischemic resilience in male hearts. Isolated hearts from male transgenic aromatase-overexpressing (AROM(+); high estrogen, low testosterone) mice and wild-type (WT) mice (12 wk) were Langendorff perfused and subjected to ischemia-reperfusion (25 min ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion). Basal systolic function was lower in AROM(+) hearts (dP/dtmax: 4,121 ± 255 vs. 4,992 ± 283 mmHg/s, P < 0.05) and associated with augmented Akt phosphorylation, consistent with a suppressor action of estrogen on contractility. Ischemic contracture was attenuated in AROM(+) hearts (43 ± 3 vs. 55 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.05), yet AROM(+) hearts were more arrhythmic in early reperfusion. At the end of 60 min of reperfusion, AROM(+) systolic functional recovery was lower (left ventricular developed pressure: 39 ± 6 vs. 56 ± 5 %basal, P < 0.05) and diastolic dysfunction was accentuated (36 ± 4 vs. 24 ± 2 mmHg, P < 0.05). This is the first study to show that in vivo aromatase upregulation modulates basal cardiac performance and the response to ischemic stress. These data suggest that while chronic exposure to enhanced estrogenic influence may have benefits in limiting ischemic contracture severity, acute functional recovery in reperfusion is compromised. A temporally targeted, tissue-specific intervention combining aromatase treatment with inotropic support may offer therapeutic potential for men and women.
Cardiac arrhythmias of both atrial and ventricular origin are an important feature of cardiovascular disease. Novel antiarrhythmic therapies are required to overcome current drug limitations related to effectiveness and pro-arrhythmia risk in some contexts. Cardiomyocyte culture models provide a high-throughput platform for screening antiarrhythmic compounds, but comparative information about electrophysiological properties of commonly used types of cardiomyocyte preparations is lacking. Standardization of cultured cardiomyocyte microelectrode array (MEA) experimentation is required for its application as a high-throughput platform for antiarrhythmic drug development. The aim of this study was to directly compare the electrophysiological properties and responses to isoproterenol of three commonly used cardiac cultures. Neonatal rat ventricular myocytes (NRVMs), immortalized atrial HL-1 cells, and custom-generated human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) were cultured on microelectrode arrays for 48–120 h. Extracellular field potentials were recorded, and conduction velocity was mapped in the presence/absence of the β-adrenoceptor agonist isoproterenol (1 µM). Field potential amplitude and conduction velocity were greatest in NRVMs and did not differ in cardiomyocytes isolated from male/female hearts. Both NRVMs and hiPSC-CMs exhibited longer field potential durations with rate dependence and were responsive to isoproterenol. In contrast, HL-1 cells exhibited slower conduction and shorter field potential durations and did not respond to 1 µM isoproterenol. This is the first study to compare the intrinsic electrophysiologic properties of cultured cardiomyocyte preparations commonly used for in vitro electrophysiology assessment. These findings offer important comparative data to inform methodological approaches in the use of MEA and other techniques relating to cardiomyocyte functional screening investigations of particular relevance to arrhythmogenesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.