Relationships between body weight, wither height, and various other body traits, including heart girth, body length, and hip width, were studied using data from six experiments with 2625 observations. Body weight and wither height were regressed on the other body traits. Regressions of body weight including the linear, quadratic, and cubic effects of a single independent variable (heart girth, wither height, hip width or body length) indicated that each measurement would be useful in predicting body weight (R2 > .95); the regression of body weight on heart girth had the highest R2, followed by hip width. Similarly, regressions of wither height on heart girth, wither height, hip width, or body length, including linear, quadratic, and cubic effects, yielded R2 > .99. Regressions considering multiple traits as independent variables showed that the addition of a second body trait added little to the already high multiple correlations found with a single variable. In management situations for which body weight or wither height cannot be measured, various other traits can be used to estimate these body measurements accurately.
The objectives of this study were to estimate the heritability of body condition score loss (BCSL) in early lactation and estimate genetic and phenotypic correlations among BCSL, body condition score (BCS), production, and reproductive performance. Body condition scores at calving and postpartum, mature equivalents for milk, fat and protein yield, days to first service, and services per conception were obtained from Dairy Records Management Systems in Raleigh, NC. Body condition score loss was defined as BCS at calving minus postpartum BCS. Heritabilities and correlations were estimated with a series of bivariate animal models with average-information REML. Herd-year-season effects and age at calving were included in all models. The length of the prior calving interval was included for all second lactation traits, and all nonproduction traits were analyzed with and without mature equivalent milk as a covariable. Initial correlations between BCS and BCSL were obtained using BCSL and BCS observations from the same cows. Additional genetic correlation estimates were generated through relationships between a group of cows with BCSL observations and a separate group of cows with BCS observations. Heritability estimates for BCSL ranged from 0.01 to 0.07. Genetic correlation estimates between BCSL and BCS at calving ranged from -0.15 to -0.26 in first lactation and from -0.11 to -0.48 in second lactation. Genetic correlation estimates between BCSL and postpartum BCS ranged from -0.70 to -0.99 in first lactation and from -0.56 to -0.91 in second lactation. Phenotypic correlation estimates between BCSL and BCS at calving were near 0.54, whereas phenotypic correlation estimates between BCSL and postpartum BCS were near -0.65. Genetic correlations between BCSL and yield traits ranged from 0.17 to 0.50. Genetic correlations between BCSL and days to first service ranged from 0.29 to 0.68. Selection for yield appears to increase BCSL by lowering postpartum BCS. More loss in BCS was associated with an increase in days to first service.
The objectives of this study were to estimate the heritability of body condition scores (BCS) from producer and consultant-recorded data and to describe the genetic and phenotypic relationships among BCS, production traits, and reproductive performance. Body condition scores were available at calving, postpartum, first service, pregnancy check, before dry off, and at dry off from the Dairy Records Management Systems in Raleigh, NC, through the PCDART program. Heritabilities, genetic correlations, and phenotypic correlations were estimated assuming an animal model using average information REML. Herd-year-season effects and age at calving were included in all models. Prior calving interval was included in models for second and third lactations. Analyses that included reproductive traits were conducted with and without mature equivalent milk as a covariable. Heritability estimates for BCS ranged from 0.09 at dry-off to 0.15 at postpartum in first lactation. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.07 before dry-off to 0.20 at pregnancy check in second lactation and from 0.08 before dry-off to 0.19 at first service in third lactation. Genetic correlations between adjacent BCS within first lactation were greater than 0.96 with the exception of calving and postpartum (0.74). In second lactation, adjacent genetic correlations were 1.0 with the exception of calving and postpartum (0.84). Genetic correlations across lactations were greater than 0.77. Phenotypic correlations between scoring periods were highest for adjacent scoring periods and when BCS was lowest. Phenotypic correlations were lower than genetic correlations, i.e., less than 0.70. Higher BCS during the lactation were negatively related to production, both genetically and phenotypically, but the relationship was moderate. Higher BCS were favorably related genetically to reproductive performance during the lactation.
Widespread commercial application of sexed semen is expected within the next decade because of continued improvements in fertility of sexed semen and sorting capacity. The objective of this study was to explore the potential impact of widespread application of sexed semen on the structure of the dairy industry in the United States. Historically, female offspring from all heifers and cows were needed to produce enough dairy replacement heifers to replace culled cows. The use of sexed semen allows for a decoupling of breeding decisions necessary to obtain an adequate supply of dairy replacement heifers from those needed to achieve pregnancies needed to start new lactations. Application of sexed semen allows dairy producers to select among their herds' potential dams and produce dairy replacement heifers from only the genetically superior animals. The rate of genetic progress is expected to increase, but not more than 15% of the rate of gain accomplished through sire selection achieved through conventional (nonsexed) artificial insemination breeding. The supply of dairy replacement heifers is expected to grow to meet and temporarily exceed current demand, resulting in reduced prices for dairy replacement heifers. Consequently, herd turnover rates are expected to increase slightly, and herd expansions may accelerate. The rate of consolidation of dairy farms is expected to increase. Widespread application of sexed semen may temporarily increase the supply of milk, which would result in lower milk prices. The cost of milk production will be reduced as well. Many breeding options exist for the genetically poorer cows in the herd. The optimal breeding mix depends on the value of the various kinds of calves that could be produced. More crossbred calves for beef production may be produced; however, a market for these crossbred calves is not well established. Increased specialization is expected with more dairy producers deciding not to raise their own heifers but to purchase replacements. Other dairy farms might specialize in producing genetically superior dairy replacement heifers for sale. Depending on the value of calves not raised for replacements, artificial insemination organizations might market beef conventional semen or beef male sexed semen to dairy farms. The use of sexed semen should lower the cost of progeny-testing programs and embryo transfer and enhance the value of genetic markers. Eventually, the economic benefits from the use of sexed semen will be passed on to consumers.
The objectives of this study were to compare Holstein (HO), Brown Swiss (BS), and their crosses for milk, fat, and protein yields, somatic cell score (SCS), days open (DO), and age at first calving (AFC), and to estimate the effects of heterosis and recombination. First through fifth lactation records were obtained from 19 herds milking crosses among BS and HO. The edited data set included 6,534 lactation records from 3,473 cows of the following breed combinations: 2,125 pure HO, 926 pure BS, 256 BS sire x HO dam (SH), 105 backcrosses to BS (SX), 18 HO sire x BS dam, and 43 backcrosses to HO. Least squares means for daily milk, fat, and protein yields, mature-equivalent milk, fat, and protein yields, SCS, DO, and AFC were calculated for breed combinations with a model that included fixed effects of age within parity (except for AFC), days in milk for daily yield and SCS, herd-year-season of calving, and breed combination. Cow and error were random effects. Breed combination was replaced with regressions on coefficients for heterosis and recombination in a second analysis. Last, data were analyzed with a 5-trait animal model that included a single pedigree file for both breeds and coefficients for heterosis and recombination. The least squares means for fat production were 1.21, 1.15, 1.27, and 1.16 kg for HO, BS, SH, and SX, respectively, which corresponds to a heterosis estimate of 7.30% and a recombination estimate of -3.76%. Heterosis and recombination estimates for protein production were 5.63% and -3.31%, respectively. Heterosis estimates increased for fat yield (10.38%) and protein yield (7.07%) when maternal grandsire identification from a known artificial insemination sire was required. Regression coefficients indicated an 11.44-d reduction in DO due to heterosis. Heterosis estimates for SCS were inconsistent. Regression on heterosis for SCS was significant and favorable (-0.22) when the breed of sire was BS, but nonsignificant and unfavorable when sire breed was HO (0.43). Heterosis estimates were favorable for all traits, whereas recombination effects tended to be unfavorable for yield traits. Reduced performance of future generations did not appear to be the result of inseminating crossbred cows with inferior sires. Results indicated that first-generation crosses among BS and HO compared favorably with HO. Yield in subsequent generations was somewhat below expectations, perhaps due to recombination loss in HO.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.