Placing an infant prone or on side on last occasion, secondary prone position (not placed prone but turned to prone), inexperienced prone sleeping and use of a duvet, leading to head and body being covered, were shown to be risk factors. Preventive factors were using a cotton sleeping-sack and a dummy. Even in a low incidence country, such as the Netherlands, there are indications that further prevention is possible.

Dummy use seems to be an important preventive factor for cot death in the Netherlands, independent of other risk factors such as prone sleeping and bedding. We recommend dummy use at least for bottle-fed infants. We found no indication that dummies influence the frequency or duration of breast feeding but more data are needed. Mouth breathing appears to be associated with an increased risk for cot death, but again further research is needed.

This study aimed to assess whether previously established risk factors for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) are still valid now that the incidence in the Netherlands has dropped to 0.26 per 1000 liveborn infants. A distinction was made between immutable and mutable risk factors. This case-control study (part of the European Concerted Action on SIDS) comprised 73 SIDS cases and 146 controls and lasted from March 1995 to September 1996. Adjustments were made for sleeping position and bedding factors by treating them as covariables. Apart from these factors, well known risk factors that remain of importance in the Netherlands are: male sex, young maternal age, twins, and low socioeconomic status. These factors are largely immutable. Other well known risk factors which might reflect attitudes to child care and could possibly be mutable are: smoking, alcohol consumption by the mother, bottle feeding, and change of babycare routine. Intervention strategies should focus on early signalling, thereby assisting parents in changing these unfavourable parenting attitudes. Information on optimal child care and extra support by public health nurses specifically aimed at families at risk could help to decrease further the incidence of SIDS in the Netherlands.

Infants that died suddenly and unexpectedly were studied as part of the European Concerted Action on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Three paediatric pathologists, first independently of each other and later in a consensus meeting, classified 63 cases into 3 groups: SIDS (19 cases), borderline SIDS (30 cases) and non‐SIDS (14 cases). The interobserver agreement among the pathologists before the consensus meeting was moderate (Kappa = 0.41) and jointly it was higher (Kappa = 0.83). The distribution of epidemiologically determined risk factors was studied over these three groups. Maternal smoking after birth, low socioeconomic status and thumb sucking were found more often in SIDS than in the other cases. Inexperienced prone sleeping was a determinant for SIDS, but not for non‐SIDS. Previous hospital admission, low birthweight and/or short gestation were associated with borderline SIDS. Non‐SIDS cases received more breastfeeding, the parents hardly smoked during pregnancy and after birth, a firm mattress had been used, and more often signs of illness had been reported by the parents, compared with the SIDS and borderline SIDS cases. Bedding factors and both primary and secondary prone sleeping were equally distributed over the three groups which supports the hypothesis that, in SIDS and borderline SIDS, as well as in non‐SIDS cases, some similar external and preventable factors might influence the events leading to death. Research should therefore focus on all sudden unexpected deaths, after which subgroups such as SIDS cases can be separately analysed. The postmortem is an essential part of the whole work‐up of each case and the results should be interpreted with all other available data to arrive at a sound evaluation of cases and thus form the basis for the prevention of all sudden unexpected infant death.

No abstract

Infants that died suddenly and unexpectedly were studied as part of the European Concerted Action on sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Three paediatric pathologists, first independently of each other and later in a consensus meeting, classified 63 cases into 3 groups: SIDS (19 cases), borderline SIDS (30 cases) and non-SIDS (14 cases). The interobserver agreement among the pathologists before the consensus meeting was moderate (Kappa = 0.41) and jointly it was higher (Kappa = 0.83). The distribution of epidemiologically determined risk factors was studied over these three groups. Maternal smoking after birth, low socioeconomic status and thumb sucking were found more often in SIDS than in the other cases. Inexperienced prone sleeping was a determinant for SIDS, but not for non-SIDS. Previous hospital admission, low birthweight and/or short gestation were associated with borderline SIDS. Non-SIDS cases received more breastfeeding, the parents hardly smoked during pregnancy and after birth, a firm mattress had been used, and more often signs of illness had been reported by the parents, compared with the SIDS and borderline SIDS cases. Bedding factors and both primary and secondary prone sleeping were equally distributed over the three groups which supports the hypothesis that, in SIDS and borderline SIDS, as well as in non-SIDS cases, some similar external and preventable factors might influence the events leading to death. Research should therefore focus on all sudden unexpected deaths, after which subgroups such as SIDS cases can be separately analysed. The postmortem is an essential part of the whole work-up of each case and the results should be interpreted with all other available data to arrive at a sound evaluation of cases and thus form the basis for the prevention of all sudden unexpected infant death.