Voltage‐gated K+ channels activating close to resting membrane potentials are widely expressed and differentially located in axons, presynaptic terminals and cell bodies. There is extensive evidence for localisation of Kv1 subunits at many central synaptic terminals but few clues to their presynaptic function. We have used the calyx of Held to investigate the role of presynaptic Kv1 channels in the rat by selectively blocking Kv1.1 and Kv1.2 containing channels with dendrotoxin‐K (DTX‐K) and tityustoxin‐Kα (TsTX‐Kα) respectively. We show that Kv1.2 homomers are responsible for two‐thirds of presynaptic low threshold current, whilst Kv1.1/Kv1.2 heteromers contribute the remaining current. These channels are located in the transition zone between the axon and synaptic terminal, contrasting with the high threshold K+ channel subunit Kv3.1 which is located on the synaptic terminal itself. Kv1 homomers were absent from bushy cell somata (from which the calyx axons arise); instead somatic low threshold channels consisted of heteromers containing Kv1.1, Kv1.2 and Kv1.6 subunits. Current‐clamp recording from the calyx showed that each presynaptic action potential (AP) was followed by a depolarising after‐potential (DAP) lasting around 50 ms. Kv1.1/Kv1.2 heteromers had little influence on terminal excitability, since DTX‐K did not alter AP firing. However TsTX‐Kα increased DAP amplitude, bringing the terminal closer to threshold for generating an additional AP. Paired pre‐ and postsynaptic recordings confirmed that this aberrant AP evoked an excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC). We conclude that Kv1.2 channels have a general presynaptic function in suppressing terminal hyperexcitability during the depolarising after‐potential.

Buffering Ca2+ rises with BAPTA prevented ATP from activating the current. 3. Ca2+-activated Cl-currents could be distinguished from volume-activated Cl-currents, which were sometimes coactivated in the same cell. The latter showed much less outward rectification, their activation was voltage independent, and they could be inhibited by exposing the cells to hypertonic solutions. 5. This Ca2P-activated Cl-current, Iclca' inactivated rapidly at negative potentials and activated slowly at positive potentials. Outward tail currents were slowly decaying, while inward tail currents decayed much faster. 6. 4,4'-Diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2'-disulphonic acid (DIDS) and niflumic acid inhibited Ica in a voltage-dependent manner, i.e. they exerted a more potent block at positive potentials. The block by N-phenylanthracilic acid (NPA), 5-nitro-2-(3-phenylpropylamino)-benzoate (NPPB) and tamoxifen was voltage independent. Niflumic acid and tamoxifen were the most potent blockers. 7. The single-channel conductance was 7-9 + 0 7 pS (n = 15) at 300 mm extracellular CF. The channel open probability was high at positive potentials, but very small at negative potentials.8. It is concluded that [Ca2+]i activates small-conductance Cl-channels in endothelial cells, which coexist with the volume-activated Cl-channels described previously.In many cell types, the membrane permeability for K+ and Cl-is modulated by changes in the free intracellular Ca2P

Volume-activated Cl- currents (ICl,vol) and cell growth have been measured in cultured endothelial cells from bovine pulmonary artery (CPAE) in the absence and presence of compounds which block these currents. The anti-oestrogen drug tamoxifen, which efficiently arrests the growth of breast cancer cells (1), inhibits both ICl,vol and cell proliferation with IC50 of 3.8 and 4.8 micromol/l respectively.NPPB and quinine, which also block ICl,vol, inhibit the growth of CPAE cells as well. Current and cell growth were closely correlated under all these conditions. We conclude that ICl,vol might be involved in the control of endothelial cell growth and thus might be important for the modulation of vascularisation and vascular remodelling.

No abstract

The spiral ganglion cells provide the afferent innervation of the hair cells of the organ of Corti. Ninety-five percent of these cells (termed type I spiral ganglion neurones) are in synaptic contact with the inner hair cells, whereas about 5% of them are type II cells, which are responsible for the sensory innervation of the outer hair cells. To understand the function of the spiral ganglion neurones, it is important to explore their membrane properties, understand their activity patterns and describe the variety of ionic channels determining their behaviour. In this review, a brief description is given of the various experimental methods that allow the investigation of the spiral ganglion cells, followed by the discussion of their action potential firing patterns and ionic conductances. The presence, distribution and significance of the K(+) currents of the spiral ganglion cells are specifically addressed, along with the introduction of the putative subunit compositions of the relevant voltage-gated K(+) channels.