Objective: To evaluate whether SOHLH2 intronic variation contributes to the genetic predisposition to male infertility traits, including severe oligospermia (SO) and different nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) clinical phenotypes. Design: Genetic association study.

YAO et Al. | INTRODUC TI ONSince the first case of coronavirus disease 2019 , caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was reported in Wuhan, China, it has rapidly spread and affected more than 21 million people worldwide as of 17 August 2020. 1 SARS-CoV-2 uses angiotensin-converting enzyme II (ACE2) to enter host cells, similar to SARS-CoV, which emerged 18 years ago. 2 COVID-19 induces respiratory-predominant multiorgan dysfunction, including myocardial, renal, enteric and hepatic dysfunction, which coincides with the tissue expression of ACE2. 3 Meanwhile, several studies have shown that ACE2 is expressed in human testes (eg spermatogonia, Leydig cells and Sertoli cells), 4,5 suggesting that the testes may be another organ affected by COVID-19.Numerous viruses have been detected in human semen. 6 Viruses may persist in semen and last longer in seminal fluid than in other body fluids due to the immune privilege of the testes and the contribution of the blood-testes barrier to resistance to therapeutic agents. 7,8 Semen may also have higher loads of viruses, such as Zika virus, than blood. 9,10 Therefore, the testes may act as a reservoir of virus, which may cause imprecise evaluation of viral clearance in patients. Viruses, including Zika virus, Ebola virus, cytomegalovirus and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), have been isolated from semen and can be sexually transmitted. 6,11,12 Furthermore, some viruses (eg HIV, Zika virus, herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human papillomavirus) can adhere to or be internalized by spermatozoa, 7,13 which may pose a risk for embryonic infection and cause adverse reproductive outcomes.On the other hand, many viruses, such as mumps virus, HIV and HSV, 7,14 have been found to impair semen quality, and they may directly interact with spermatozoa or affect spermatogenesis by inducing local inflammation. [15][16][17] Previous studies found that SARS, 1 of the 3 epidemic coronaviruses to emerge in the past 20 years and that shows similar clinical presentations to COVID-19, 18 could cause orchitis 19 and focal testicular atrophy. 20 Considering the tens of millions of COVID-19 cases and that men are more vulnerable to COVID-19 than women, [21][22][23] it is imperative to determine the effect of COVID-19 on male reproduction. 24 Several studies have been performed on this topic. However, the results are controversial. For example, some researchers have reported that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the male reproductive tract, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] while others reported that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was found in the semen or testes of COVID-19 patients. 35,36 There are also unknown factors regarding COVID-19 and male reproduction.Orchitis and broad destruction of the testes were found in deceased COVID-19 patients, 35,37 while the pathological characteristics in survivors remain unknown. In this review, we summarize the current research focusing on the effects of COVID-19 on male reproduction from the following 3 aspects: detection of SARS-CoV-2 in...

Infertility is a growing concern in developed societies. Two extreme phenotypes of male infertility are non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and severe oligospermia (SO), which are characterized by severe spermatogenic failure (SpF). We designed a genetic association study comprising 725 Iberian infertile men as a consequence of SpF and 1058 unaffected controls to evaluate whether five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), previously associated with reduced fertility in Hutterites, are also involved in the genetic susceptibility to idiopathic SpF and specific clinical entities. A significant difference in the allele frequencies of USP8-rs7174015 was observed under the recessive model between the NOA group and both the control group (p = 0.0226, OR = 1.33) and the SO group (p = 0.0048, OR = 1.78). Other genetic associations for EPSTI1-rs12870438 and PSAT1-rs7867029 with SO and between TUSC1-rs10966811 and testicular sperm extraction (TESE) success in the context of NOA were observed. In silico analysis of functional annotations demonstrated cis-eQTL effects of such SNPs likely due to the modification of binding motif sites for relevant transcription factors of the spermatogenic process. The findings reported here shed light on the molecular mechanisms leading to severe phenotypes of idiopathic male infertility, and may help to better understand the contribution of the common genetic variation to the development of these conditions.

Purpose To analyze the efficiency and cost-utility profile of ureteroscopy versus shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of reno-ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm. Methods Patients treated for urinary stones smaller than 2 cm were included in this study (n = 750) and divided into two groups based on technique of treatment. To assess the cost-utility profile a sample of 48 patients (50% of each group) was evaluated. Quality of life survey (Euroqol 5QD-3L) before-after treatment was applied, Markov model was designed to calculate quality of life in each status of the patients (stone or stone-free with and without double-J stent) and to estimate the incremental cost-utility. Monte carlo simulation was conducted for a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Chi-square was used for comparing qualitative variables and T student's for continuous variables. Results Shock wave lithotripsy group had 408 (54.4%) and ureteroscopy group had 342 (45.6%) patients. Of them, 56.3% were treated for renal stones and 43.7% for ureteral stones. Ureteroscopy produced slightly higher overall quality of patients' life, but produced a significant higher overall cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) than shock wave lithotripsy, exceeding the cost-utility threshold (20,000€/QALY). Sensitivity analysis confirmed results in 93.65% of cases. Difference was maintained in subgroup analysis (ureteral vs renal stones). Conclusions Results suggest that in our clinical setting shock wave lithotripsy has better cost-utility profile than ureteroscopy for treatment of reno-ureteral stones less than 2 cm, but excluding waiting times, in ideal clinical setting, ureteroscopy would have better cost-utility profile than shock wave lithotripsy.

We conducted a genome-wide association study in a large population of infertile men due to unexplained spermatogenic failure (SPGF). More than seven million genetic variants were analysed in 1,274 SPGF cases and 1,951 unaffected controls from two independent European cohorts. Two genomic regions were associated with the most severe histological pattern of SPGF, defined by Sertoli cell-only (SCO) phenotype, namely the MHC class II gene HLA-DRB1 (rs1136759, P = 1.32E-08, OR = 1.80) and an upstream locus of VRK1 (rs115054029, P = 4.24E-08, OR = 3.14), which encodes a protein kinase involved in the regulation of spermatogenesis. The SCO-associated rs1136759 allele (G) determines a serine in the position 13 of the HLA-DRβ1 molecule located in the antigen-binding pocket. Overall, our data support the notion of unexplained SPGF as a complex trait influenced by common variation in the genome, with the SCO phenotype likely representing an immune-mediated condition.

Background: Previous studies in animal models evidenced that genetic mutations of KATNAL1, resulting in dysfunction of its encoded protein, lead to male infertility through disruption of microtubule remodelling and premature germ cell exfoliation.Subsequent studies in humans also suggested a possible role of KATNAL1 singlenucleotide polymorphisms in the development of male infertility as a consequence of severe spermatogenic failure. Objectives:The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effect of the common genetic variation of KATNAL1 in a large and phenotypically well-characterised cohort of infertile men because of severe spermatogenic failure. Materials and methods:A total of 715 infertile men because of severe spermatogenic failure, including 210 severe oligospermia and 505 non-obstructive azoospermia patients, as well as 1058 unaffected controls were genotyped for three KATNAL1 single-nucleotide polymorphism taggers (rs2077011, rs7338931 and rs2149971).Case-control association analyses by logistic regression assuming different models and in silico functional characterisation of risk variants were conducted.Results: Genetic associations were observed between the three analysed taggers and different severe spermatogenic failure groups. However, in all cases, the haplotype model (rs2077011*C | rs7338931*T | rs2149971*A) better explained the observed associations than the three risk alleles independently. This haplotype was associated with non-obstructive azoospermia (adjusted p = 4.96E-02, odds ratio = 2.97), Sertolicell only syndrome (adjusted p = 2.83E-02, odds ratio = 5.16) and testicular sperm extraction unsuccessful outcomes (adjusted p = 8.99E-04, odds ratio = 6.13). The in silico analyses indicated that the effect on severe spermatogenic failure predisposition could be because of an alteration of the KATNAL1 splicing pattern.Conclusions: Specific allelic combinations of KATNAL1 genetic polymorphisms may confer a risk of developing severe male infertility phenotypes by favouring the overrepresentation of a short non-functional transcript isoform in the testis.

No abstract

No abstract