The effect of membrane potential on feedback inhibition of acetylcholine (ACh) release was studied using the frog neuromuscular junction. It was found that membrane potential affects the functional affinity (K(i)) of the presynaptic M2 muscarinic receptor. The K(i) for muscarine shifts from approximately 0.23 microm (at resting potential) to approximately 8 microm (at a high depolarization). Measurements of Ca2+ currents in axon terminals showed that the depolarization-mediated shift in K(i) does not stem from depolarization-dependent changes in Ca2+ influx. Pretreatments with pertussis toxin (PTX) abolished the depolarization-dependent shift in K(i); at all depolarizations K(i) was the same and higher (approximately 32 microm) than before PTX treatment. The inhibitory effect of muscarine on ACh release is produced by two independent mechanisms: a slow, PTX-sensitive process, which prevails at low to medium depolarizations and operates already at low muscarine concentrations, and a fast, PTX-insensitive and voltage-independent process, which requires higher muscarine concentrations. Neither of the two processes involves a reduction in Ca2+ influx.

Parnas, H., I. Slutsky, G. Rashkovan, I. Silman, J. Wess, and I. Parnas. Depolarization initiates phasic acetylcholine release by relief of a tonic block imposed by presynaptic M 2 muscarinic receptors. J Neurophysiol 93: 3257-3269, 2005. First published February 9, 2005 doi:10.1152/jn.01131.2004. The role of presynaptic muscarinic autoreceptors in the initiation of phasic acetylcholine (ACh) release at frog and mouse neuromuscular junctions was studied by measuring the dependency of the amount (m) of ACh release on the level of presynaptic depolarization. Addition of methoctramine (a blocker of M 2 muscarinic receptors), or of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), increased release in a voltage-dependent manner; enhancement of release declined as the depolarizing pulse amplitude increased. In frogs and wild-type mice the slope of log m/log pulse amplitude (PA) was reduced from about 7 in the control to about 4 in the presence of methoctramine or AChE. In M 2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice, the slope of log m/log PA was much smaller (about 4) and was not further reduced by addition of either methoctramine or AChE. The effect of a brief (0.1 ms), but strong (Ϫ1.2 A) depolarizing prepulse on the dependency of m on PA was also studied. The depolarizing prepulse had effects similar to those of methoctramine and AChE. In particular, it enhanced release of test pulses in a voltage-dependent manner and reduced the slope of log m/log PA from about 7 to about 4. Methoctramine ϩ AChE occluded the prepulse effects. In knockout mice, the depolarizing prepulse had no effects. The cumulative results suggest that initiation of phasic ACh release is achieved by depolarization-mediated relief of a tonic block imposed by presynaptic M 2 muscarinic receptors. I N T R O D U C T I O NPresynaptic G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to modulate neurotransmitter release by various mechanisms (MacDermott et al. 1999), one of which involves direct modulation of proteins of the release machinery (for example, Blackmer et al. 2001;Capogna et al. 1996;Scholz and Miller 1992;Silinsky 1984;Trudeau et al. 1996; for review see Miller 1998).We recently proposed that control of the time course of neurotransmitter release, both of initiation and termination, is achieved by a direct effect of presynaptic inhibitory autoreceptors on key proteins of the release machinery . In particular, we proposed that at rest (i.e., at resting potential and resting low level of transmitter in the cleft) the release machinery is under tonic block. The block is achieved as a result of an interaction of the transmitter-occupied inhibitory autoreceptor with the core proteins of the release machinery. At resting potential the receptor is in a high-affinity state and thus can be occupied even at the low tonic concentration of transmitter. Initiation of release is achieved by depolarization shifting the autoreceptor to a low-affinity state, resulting in fast dissociation of the transmitter from the receptor. The free autoreceptor rapidly detaches from the proteins o...

Ca 2؉ is essential for physiological depolarization-evoked synchronous neurotransmitter release. But, whether Ca 2؉ influx or another factor controls release initiation is still under debate. The time course of ACh release is controlled by a presynaptic inhibitory G protein-coupled autoreceptor (GPCR), whose agonist-binding affinity is voltage-sensitive. However, the relevance of this property for release control is not known. To resolve this question, we used pertussis toxin (PTX), which uncouples GPCR from its Gi/o and in turn reduces the affinity of GPCR toward its agonist. We show that PTX enhances ACh and glutamate release (in mice and crayfish, respectively) and, most importantly, alters the time course of release without affecting Ca 2؉ currents. These effects are not mediated by G␤␥ because its microinjection into the presynaptic terminal did not alter the time course of release. Also, PTX reduces the association of the GPCR with the exocytotic machinery, and this association is restored by the addition of agonist. We offer the following mechanism for control of initiation and termination of physiological depolarization-evoked transmitter release. At rest, release is under tonic block achieved by the transmitter-bound high-affinity presynaptic GPCR interacting with the exocytotic machinery. Upon depolarization, the GPCR uncouples from its G protein and consequently shifts to a low-affinity state toward the transmitter. The transmitter dissociates, the unbound GPCR detaches from the exocytotic machinery, and the tonic block is alleviated. The free machinery, together with Ca 2؉ that had already entered, initiates release. Release terminates when the reverse occurs upon repolarization.G protein-coupled receptor ͉ neurotransmitter release ͉ pertussis toxin ͉ presynaptic receptors C a 2ϩ influx is essential for physiological depolarizationinduced neurotransmitter (NT) release (1, 2). A broader, Ca 2ϩ voltage, hypothesis suggests that two factors control release: Ca 2ϩ and G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), whose agonist-binding affinity is voltage-dependent (3). The mechanism suggested for this control is as follows. (i) At resting potential and rest concentration (nMs) of transmitter, the release machinery (SNARE proteins and synaptotagmin) is under tonic block imposed by the transmitter-bound high-affinity (nMs) GPCR. (ii) Depolarization shifts the GPCR to a lowaffinity state ( Ms), resulting in rapid transmitter dissociation (it should be emphasized that at this stage release of NT did not occur yet, and the concentration of NT in the synapse is still in the nM range). (iii) The unbound GPCR detaches from the release machinery to relieve the tonic block. The free-release machinery together with Ca 2ϩ , which had already entered, initiates release. (iv) Upon repolarization, release terminates because the receptor returns to its high-affinity state and the tonic block is reinstated.Much of this suggested mechanism was supported experimentally (3-8) by using mainly the cholinergic neuromuscular junction (N...

Release of excitatory transmitter from boutons on crayfish nerve terminals was inhibited by (R,S)-baclofen, an agonist at GABAB receptors. Baclofen had no postsynaptic actions as it reduced quantal content without affecting quantal amplitude. The effect of baclofen increased with concentration producing 18% inhibition at 10 microM; EC50, 50% inhibition at 30 microM; maximal inhibition, 85% at 100 microM and higher. There was no desensitization, even with 200 or 320 microM baclofen. Phaclofen, an antagonist at GABAB receptors, competitively antagonized the inhibitory action of baclofen (KD = 50 microM, equivalent to a pA2 = 4.3 +/- 0.1). Phaclofen on its own at concentrations below 200 microM had no effect on release, whereas at 200 microM phaclofen itself increased the control level of release by 60%, as did 2-hydroxy-saclofen (200 microM), another antagonist at GABAB receptors. This increase was evidently due to antagonism of a persistent level of GABA in the synaptic cleft, since the effect was abolished by destruction of the presynaptic inhibitory fiber, using intra-axonal pronase. We conclude that presynaptic GABAB receptors, with a pharmacological profile similar to that of mammalian GABAB receptors, are involved in the control of transmitter release at the crayfish neuromuscular junction.

Presynaptic inhibition is produced by increasing Cl(-) conductance, resulting in an action potential of a smaller amplitude at the excitatory axon terminals. This, in turn, reduces Ca(2+) entry to produce a smaller release. For this mechanism to operate, the "inhibitory" effect of shunting should last during the arrival of the "excitatory" action potential to its terminals, and to achieve that, the inhibitory action potential should precede the excitatory action potential. Using the crayfish neuromuscular preparation which is innervated by one excitatory axon and one inhibitory axon, we found, at 12 degrees C, prominent presynaptic inhibition when the inhibitory action potential followed the excitatory action potential by 1, and even 2, ms. The presynaptic excitatory action potential and the excitatory nerve terminal current (ENTC) were not altered, and Ca(2+) imaging at single release boutons showed that this "late" presynaptic inhibition did not result from a reduction in Ca(2+) entry. Since 50 microM picrotoxin blocked this late component of presynaptic inhibition, we suggest that gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptors reduce transmitter release also by a mechanism other than affecting Ca(2+) entry.

Central nervous system (CNS) oxygen toxicity, as manifested by the first electrical discharge (FED) in the electroencephalogram, can occur as convulsions and loss of consciousness. CO(2) potentiates this risk by vasodilation and pH reduction. We suggest that CO(2) can produce CNS oxygen toxicity at a PO(2) that does not on its own ultimately cause FED. We searched for the CO(2) threshold that will result in the appearance of FED at a PO(2) between 507 and 253 kPa. Rats were exposed to a PO(2) and an inspired PCO(2) in 1-kPa steps to define the threshold for FED. The results confirmed our assumption that each rat has its own PCO(2) threshold, any PCO(2) above which will cause FED but below which no FED will occur. As PO(2) decreased from 507 to 456, 405, and 355 kPa, the percentage of rats that exhibited FED without the addition of CO(2) (F(0)) dropped from 91 to 62, to 8 and 0%, respectively. The percentage of rats (F) having FED as a function of PCO(2) was sigmoid in shape and displaced toward high PCO(2) with the reduction in PO(2). The following formula is suggested to express risk as a function of PCO(2) and PO(2) [abstract: see text] where P(50) is the PCO(2)for the half response and N is power. A small increase in PCO(2) at a PO(2) that does not cause CNS oxygen toxicity may shift an entire population into the risk zone. Closed-circuit divers who are CO(2)retainers or divers who have elevated inspired CO(2)are at increased risk of CNS oxygen toxicity.

Peptides that inhibit the SNAP-stimulated ATPase activity of N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF-2, NSF-3) were injected intra-axonally to study the role of this protein in the release of glutamate at the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Macropatch recording was used to establish the quantal content and to construct synaptic delay histograms. NSF-2 or NSF-3 injection reduced the quantal content, evoked by either direct depolarization of a single release bouton or by axonal action potentials, on average by 66 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD; n = 32), but had no effect on the time course of release. NSF-2 had no effect on the amplitude or shape of the presynaptic action potential nor on the excitatory nerve terminal current. Neither NSF-2 nor NSF-3 affected the shape or amplitude of single quantal currents. Injection of a peptide with the same composition as NSF-2, but with a scrambled amino acid sequence, failed to alter the quantal content. We conclude that, at the crayfish neuromuscular junction, NSF-dependent reactions regulate quantal content without contributing to the presynaptic mechanisms that control the time course of release.

No abstract