Aim
A retrospective review of all operated hernia patients in which a single brand of Biologic mesh was used, since it's first introduction in our Trust and to date, has been conducted. During last almost 5 years, twelve patients were identified and included. All patients operated with any other type of Biologic mesh and all patients operated with synthetic meshes were excluded, as the aim of the study was to look at the efficiency of a particular product, which was the cheapest biologic mesh at the time of contract with our Hospital.
Material and Methods
Retrospective review of patient's notes and outcomes, including post-op follow-up and long-term follow-up. The study looked at the following criteria: indication of use as per VHWG (ventral hernia working group) classification of the patients, LOS (length of stay) compared with patients operated with synthetic mesh, any post-op complications including SSO/SSI (surgical site occurrence and/or infection) and outcome at follow-up to date, including recurrence, chronic pain or mesh infection.
Results
The biologic mesh studied proved itself as a reliable product and provided a durable repair in the cases where it was used. It was noticed that majority of the cases were emergency presentations for complicated ventral or inguinal hernias, the complexity of the cases compared with elective cases being higher (higher ASA grade patients, non-optimised etc).
Conclusions
The outcome of the study recommends to continue utilising this product, as efficient and financially competitive.
Aim
Despite a recent meta-analysis published in SAGE in 2021 by a group of chinese researchers, which included 10 RCTs, the research committee for this study felt that a substantial volume of recent literature, including 7 RCTs and 3 high value non-RCT newly published articles have not been included in the latest meta-analysis and a new study is required, to understand the clinical usefulness of abdominal binders, following abdominal wall reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, no recent studies looked at the long-term impact of abdominal binders and whether their use prevent hernia recurrence, if applied from the immediate post-op period.
Material & Methods
A thorough review of all medical literature published in english language since year 2000 and to date was carried out, using the following keywords: “hernia”, “hernia repair”, “abdominal wall reconstruction” and “abdominal binder”. 17 randomised control trials and 3 non-RCT studies (systematic reviews and surveys) were included in the study. A total of 5216 patients were included in the 20 studies included. The databases searched were PubMed, Medbase, Jama and Embase.
Results/Conclusions
The use of abdominal binders following abdominal wall surgery suggests a better pain control when compared with non-users group. This contributes to earlier mobilisation and by this preventing secondary post-op complications. There is building evidence that in long term the use of abdominal binders reduces the risk of hernia recurrence and this could be in relation to decreased post-op pain and earlier return to a normal activities in the immediate post-op period.
Amyand’s hernia (AH) is characterized by the presence of the vermiform appendix in an inguinal hernia sac. Typically presenting on the right side and with manifestations similar to those seen in complicated hernias, it presents a diagnostic challenge and is frequently only diagnosed intraoperatively. We present the case of a left-sided AH on a 75-year-old man treated with appendicectomy, orchidectomy and hernioplasty without mesh.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.