Thousands of stone terrace walls were constructed by past societies in the dry valleys of the central Negev highlands to capture runoff/floodwaters from local rainfall to enable agriculture in the desert. Human intervention in geomorphic processes led to human-made geodiversity, as significant differences developed between terraced and natural stream channels. The former are characterised by soil aggradation, as terraced fields also captured sediment during each rainfall/flood event. The natural stream channels, on-the-other-hand, often experienced erosion and desertification. The ancient agricultural terraces were abandoned about 1000 years ago, but many stone terrace walls are still intact. On the basis of fieldwork, we report new findings of sophisticated design characteristics of terrace walls. (1) Mutual friction-hold of rectangular building stones was increased by placing the longest axis parallel with the flow direction of the floodwater and orienting the second longest axis vertically in the terrace wall.(2) The gradual addition of stone layers in the terrace walls, necessary to keep the wall above the aggrading field surface, was sometimes performed in a way that resulted in a staircase construction. Thus, the floodwaters would gradually cascade down to the next terraced field, thereby preventing undercutting and erosion. (3) In larger stream channels of 4th and 5th orders, the longitudinal axis of terrace walls was sometimes constructed with an oblique angle. This was apparently performed for two reasons: (i) to lessen the impact of the floodwaters on the terrace wall and (ii) to steer the water in diversion systems further onto the floodplain.
Bruins, H.J. and Ore, G. 2008. Runoff from loess or bedrock? Hillslope geoarchaeology of ancient runoff farming systems at Horvat Haluqim and Har Eldad in the central Negev Desert. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 57: 231-247.Remains of ancient farming systems based on runoff harvesting are widespread in the central Negev Desert. Modern hydrological research in the region led to two alternative concepts in relation to runoff generation, one placing the emphasis on loess and the other on bedrock. Did the ancient inhabitants design their farming systems to obtain runoff from loess-covered surfaces or rather from bedrock outcrops?Reconstruction of each ancient runoff-farming site with multi-annual hydrological measurements to answer the above question is obviously impossible. Yet, the focus of archaeology is site specific and requires individual research at each location. Therefore, we developed a geoarchaeological approach that can be used at each site to address the above question and assess the relationships between archaeological runoff-farming remains and related geomorphic hillslope features.We tested our approach at two different sites: (1) Horvat Haluqim on the Haluqim Anticline; (2) Har Eldad in the Avdat area. The concave hillslopes at Horvat Haluqim are 45-85 m long, becoming steeper (20-30°) towards the first-order terraced wadibed. Colluvium is generally absent. Bedded limestone outcrops (17-57%) alternate with patches of loess and stones (43-83%) along the entire hillslope. Human-made conduits and stone mounds do not exist here. Hence, runoff from the natural catchment-alternating bedrock and shallow loess-supplied the terraced fields with water.At Har Eldad, ancient long-range runoff channels begin on the extensive flat (3% gradient) hilltop plateau, (ca. 50 ha) covered with loess and stones (98%). The steep upper slope (130 m) is dominated by limestone bedrock (ca. 90%). The very long (224 m) convex colluvial slope (99.9% loess and stones) exhibits stone mounds, stone strips, and conduits. Runoff was obtained both from loess and bedrock surfaces to supply water to terraced wadis below Har Eldad.Both sites indicate that the loess runoff theory and bedrock runoff theory are complementary and not contradictory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.