This randomized study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel, with a statistically and clinically significant prolongation of PFS (> 5 months) in patients receiving nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m(2) weekly compared with docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) q3w.

No abstract

Introduction: This nonrandomized study aimed to identify the optimal dose of every-3-week (q3w) and weekly nab-paclitaxel plus q3w carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for a phase 3 trial. Methods: Previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled sequentially into seven cohorts (25 patients/cohort, N ϭ 175). Cohorts 1 to 4 and 5 to 7 received nab-paclitaxel q3w and weekly, respectively. Patients were evaluated for efficacy and safety. Results:The most common treatment-related Ն grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), neuropathy (19%), fatigue (9%), and thrombocytopenia (29%) (no grade 4 neuropathy or fatigue). A 100 mg/m 2 weekly nab-paclitaxel produced less serious adverse events than other doses/schedules. Response rate (RR) was greater in the weekly versus q3w cohorts (47% vs. 30%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 4.8 to 6.9 months, and overall survival (OS) ranged from 8.3 to 15.0 months (all cohorts). Patients receiving 100 mg/m 2 weekly nab-paclitaxel achieved 48% RR with 6.2 and 11.3 months of PFS and OS, respectively. In a retrospective analysis, patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma receiving weekly nab-paclitaxel had significantly improved RR (59.4% vs. 23.5%, respectively, p ϭ 0.003), and Ͼ2 months longer PFS and OS compared with q3w schedule. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the q3w schedule significantly increased PFS by 3 months (p ϭ 0.014) and OS by Ͼ2 months (no difference in RR) compared with the weekly schedule. Conclusion:nab-Paclitaxel plus carboplatin is an effective therapy for advanced NSCLC. Based on favorable efficacy and safety profiles, a phase 3, randomized, multicenter study comparing 100 mg/m 2 weekly nab-paclitaxel plus q3w carboplatin to solvent-based paclitaxel plus carboplatin has enrolled patients.

Background:This phase 2 study evaluated trebananib (AMG 386), an investigational peptide-Fc fusion protein that neutralises the interaction between angiopoietins-1/2 and the Tie2 receptor, plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Methods:Patients had adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum with progression within 6 months of receiving only one prior fluoropyrimidine/oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. All patients received FOLFIRI and were randomised 2 : 1 to also receive intravenous trebananib 10 mg kg−1 once weekly (QW) (Arm A) or placebo QW (Arm B). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).Results:One hundred and forty-four patients were randomised (Arms A/B, n=95/49). Median PFS in Arms A and B was 3.5 and 5.2 months (hazard ratio (HR) 1.23; 95% CI, 0.81–1.86; P=0.33) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.9 and 8.8 months, respectively (HR 0.90; 95% CI; 0.53–1.54; P=0.70). Objective response rate (ORR) was 14% and 0% in Arms A and B, respectively. Incidence of grade ⩾3 adverse events was similar between treatment arms (Arm A, 61% Arm B, 65%) and included pulmonary embolism (1%/4%), deep vein thrombosis (5%/2%), and hypertension (1%/0%).Conclusion:Administration of trebananib plus FOLFIRI did not prolong PFS compared with placebo plus FOLFIRI. Toxicities were manageable and consistent with those known for FOLFIRI and trebananib.

No abstract

No abstract

8020 Background: The SATURN (BO18192) study investigated whether erlotinib maintenance therapy improved PFS in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC who had obtained clinical benefit from 1st-line chemotherapy. This study included a prospective analysis of the prognostic/predictive value of several molecular markers. Methods: 889 pts with advanced NSCLC whose disease had not progressed following 4 cycles of 1st-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy were randomized to erlotinib 150 mg/day or placebo. Mandatory tumor specimens were collected at baseline and tested for EGFR protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC), EGFR gene copy number using fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), and EGFR and KRAS somatic mutations using DNA sequencing. Pts were stratified according to EGFR IHC status (any membranous staining in ≥10% tumor cells used as cut-off); the co-primary endpoint was PFS in EGFR IHC+ pts. Baseline whole blood samples were obtained for genotyping of EGFR (intron 1 CA-repeat polymorphisms). Results: In the overall population, erlotinib significantly prolonged PFS vs placebo (HR 0.71, p<.0001; primary endpoint). The co-primary endpoint was also met, with erlotinib significantly improving PFS in the EGFR IHC+ group (HR 0.69, p<.0001). Many tumor samples were assessable for molecular marker status (see table). Biomarker data suggest that patients derived a PFS benefit with erlotinib irrespective of EGFR FISH or EGFR intron 1 CA-repeat status. The magnitude of benefit with erlotinib was similar in both KRAS-mutant and KRAS wild-type pts. Conclusions: This is the largest biomarker analysis performed for erlotinib in a randomized, placebo-controlled setting, and answers key scientific questions regarding the prognostic and predictive value of potential biomarkers of efficacy. Full data will be presented. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

LBA4001 Background: Claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) is a tight junction protein expressed by several cancers including gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. IMAB362 is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that mediates specific killing of CLDN18.2-positive cancer cells by activation of immune effector mechanisms. IMAB362 has demonstrated single-agent activity and was safe and tolerable in patients (pts) with pretreated gastric cancer. Methods: Pts with advanced/recurrent gastric and GEJ cancer were centrally evaluated for CLDN18.2 expression by IHC (validated CLAUDETECT18.2 Kit). Eligible pts had a CLDN18.2 expression of ≥ 2+ in ≥ 40% tumor cells, an ECOG PS of 0–1 and were not eligible for trastuzumab. Pts were randomized 1:1 to first-line EOX (epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1, and capecitabine 625 mg/m2 bid, d1–21; qd22) with or without IMAB362 (loading dose 800 mg/m2, then 600 mg/m2 d1, qd21). The study was extended by an exploratory Arm3 (N = 85) to investigate a high dose IMAB362 (1000 mg/m2) plus EOX, (not subject here). The primary study endpoint was PFS (Arm 1 v 2, 70% power, HR 0.72, 1-sided p = 0.1). Results: 730 pts were consented, of whom 352 pts (48%) were tested CLDN18.2+ per protocol criteria. Of those, 161 pts (median age, 58 yrs; male 64%; gastric, 80%; GEJ, 16%; esophageal, 4%) were randomized into Arms1 and 2. The study met its endpoints. IMAB362 plus EOX improved PFS (median 5.7 v 7.9 mon; HR 0.5; 95% CI 0.35–0.78, 1-sided p = 0.001) and OS (median 8.7 v 12.5 mon; HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.28–0.73) compared to EOX alone. In the subpopulation with very high CLDN18.2 expression ( ≥ 2+ intensity in ≥ 70% tumor cells), efficacy was more pronounced (PFS, 6.1 vs 9.1 mon; HR 0.46; OS, 9.3 v 16.6 mon; HR 0.44). Most common IMAB362-related adverse events included vomiting, neutropenia, and anemia, which were mostly of NCI-CTC grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 events were not significantly increased by IMAB362. Conclusions: IMAB362 combined with first-line chemotherapy exhibited a clinically relevant benefit in PFS and OS and a favorable risk/benefit profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01630083.