Summary Conventional theories of sand production prediction distinguish between compressive (shear) cavity (perforation, borehole) failure, induced by a combination of in-situ stress and drawdown, and tensile cavity failure, induced by the near-cavity pore pressure gradient. In this paper we show, using a global criterion for strain localization around the cavity (i.e., cavity failure), that in most cases the preference for either compressive or tensile cavity failure only depends on the cavity size and on the constitutive properties of the rock, and not on effective near-cavity stress or the pore pressure gradient. It is shown that "large" cavities (e.g., boreholes) always fail in compression rather than in tension failure. Only for sufficiently small cavities (e.g., perforations) in weak, moist sandstones, is compressive failure supressed and tensile failure possible. The above results deviate significantly from previous sand production prediction concepts. They are further supported by laboratory sand production experiments with large cavities, in which sand failure was only observed for near-cavity effective stresses above a certain threshold, independent of applied drawdown (i.e., flow rate). The experiments exhibited no correlation between the (non) occurrence of sand production and drawdown. From these results, it may be concluded that the primary role of fluid flow in sand production is the transport of loose sand (debris) resulting from compressive failure, rather than failure of the intact sandstone itself. Introduction Both the effective stress near the wellbore and flow rate into the wellbore have long been identified as the main formation destabilizing factors influencing sand production. Several sand production prediction methods have been proposed based on these parameters. The Drucker-Prager model proposed by Antheunis et al.1 and Mohr-Coulomb model proposed by Coates and Denoo2 are examples of such methods based on consideration of the intact rock compressive strength, drawdown and in-situ stress. Alternatively, models such as those of Bratli et al.3,4 and of Perkins and Weingarten5,6 compare the flow-induced pressure gradient with the residual strength of disaggregated material surrounding the cavity (perforation, borehole). A well-accepted conceptual model for sand production was proposed by Morita et al.7,8In that model, sand production can either be triggered by compressive (shear) failure, induced by a combination of in-situ stress and drawdown, or by tensile failure, induced by the near-cavity pore pressure gradient. Compressive failure around a cylindrical cavity leads to the formation of breakouts adjacent to the cavity. Whether compressive failure or tensile failure prevails will depend on the precise values of the in-situ stress, drawdown and flow rate in relation to the rock strength. The extreme condition of compressive failure at zero flow rate is analogous to the problem of hollow cylinder collapse.1,9,10 The other extreme, tensile failure at zero (or very low) near-cavity effective stress, would be similar to the unconsolidated sand failure experiments performed by Hall and Harrisberger11 or by Bratli and Risnes.3 In this paper we present the results of theoretical and experimental studies of the prediction of sand failure around cylindrical and hemispherical cavities in weak sandstones under a variety of in-situ stress and flow conditions. The theoretical analysis uses a criterion for global strain localization to define macroscopic failure around the cavity. The analysis is based on bifurcation theory in combination with a Cosserat continuum. The latter accounts for effects of an internal length scale of the rock (for example, grain size). The constitutive model used in this analysis was calibrated to conventional triaxial compression test data. Previously, this approach was successfully used to describe, amongst others, the process of strain localization resulting in breakout formation around axisymmetrically loaded boreholes,12 and to reproduce the experimentally observed size dependency of hollow cylinder strength for the friable Red Wilmore13,14 and Castlegate15,16 sandstones. In the present theoretical and experimental studies, both in-situ stress and flow rate (i.e., the near-cavity pore pressure gradient) were varied over a large range of values in order to induce either compressive or tensile sand failure. The theoretical study also addressed the influence of cavity size on compressive vs. tensile failure. Finally, different flow conditions (laminar vs. turbulent, steady-state vs. early transient) were also addressed. The theoretical results show that in most cases the "preference" of a cavity for either compressive failure or tensile failure depends only on the cavity size, and not on the near-wellbore effective stress or fluid flow rate. In particular, it is shown that large cavities (e.g., boreholes) always fail in compression, whereas small cavities (e.g., perforations) may either fail in compression or in tension, depending on the material properties and moisture content (oven-dry vs. moist rocks). Only in cases of an extremely localized near-wellbore pressure gradient (e.g., very early transient flow, permeability damage), may "medium-size" cavities also exhibit tensile failure at high pressure gradient values. The above concept is entirely different from previous sand failure concepts (e.g., those of Morita et al.7,8), and is further supported by the laboratory sand production experiments (using large cavities), in which sand failure was only observed for near-cavity effective stresses above a certain threshold, independent of applied drawdown (i.e., flow rate). The experiments exhibited no correlation between the (non) occurrence of sand production and drawdown. Our theoretical results also provide an explanation for the observed high "apparent" hollow cylinder strength [in relation to unconfined compressive strength (UCS)], which is particularly pronounced in softer sandstones. Conventional explanations of this phenomenon are based on a stress-dependent Young's modulus.17,18 However, our analysis shows that the apparent high hollow cylinder strength can be largely ascribed to a size effect. Finally, our results provide an analytical framework for estimating an upper bound to the observed size dependency of hollow cylinder strength.13,19-22
Conventional theories of sand production prediction distinguish between compressive (shear) cavity (perforation, borehole) failure, induced by a combination of in-situ stress and drawdown, and tensile cavity failure; induced by the near-cavity pore pressure gradient. This paper shows, using bifurcation theory, that the preference for either compressive or tensile cavity failure only depends on cavity size and on the constitutive properties of the rock, and not on effective near-cavity stress or pore pressure gradient. It is shown that 'large' cavities (e.g. boreholes) always fail in compression rather than in tension. Only for sufficiently small cavities (e.g. perforations) in weak, moist sandstones, compressive failure is supressed, and tensile failure is possible. The above results deviate significantly from previous sand production prediction concepts. They are further supported by laboratory sand production experiments with 'large' cavities, where sand failure was only observed for near-cavity effective stresses above a certain threshold, independent of applied drawdown (i.e. flow rate). The experiments exhibited no correlation between the (non-) occurrence of sand production and drawdown. From these results, it may be concluded that the primary role of fluid flow in sand production is the transport of loose sand (debris) resulting from compressive failure, rather than failure of the intact sandstone itself. Introduction Both the effective stress near the wellbore and flow rate into the wellbore have long been identified as the main formation destabilising factors influencing sand production. Several sand production prediction methods have been proposed based on these parameters. The Drucker-Prager model proposed by Antheunis et al., and Mohr-Coulomb model proposed by Coates and Denoo are examples of such methods based on consideration of the intact rock compressive strength, drawdown and in-situ stress. Alternatively, models such as Bratli et al. and Perkins and Weingarten compare the flow-induced pressure gradient with the residual strength of disaggregated material surrounding the cavity (perforation, borehole). A well-accepted conceptual model for sand production has been proposed by Morita et al. Within this model, sand production can either be triggered by compressive (shear) failure, induced by a combination of in-situ stress and drawdown, or by 'tensile' failure, induced by the near-cavity pore pressure gradient. Compressive failure around a cylindrical cavity leads to the formation of breakouts adjacent to the cavity. Whether compressive failure or tensile failure prevails will depend on the precise values of in-situ stress, drawdown and flow rate in relation to the rock strength. The extreme condition of compressive failure at zero flow rate is analogous to the problem of hollow cylinder collapse. The other extreme, tensile failure at zero (or very low) near-cavity effective stress would be similar to the unconsolidated sand failure experiments as performed by Hall and Harrisburger or Bratli and Risnes. This paper presents the results of theoretical and experimental studies into the prediction of sand failure around cylindrical and hemispherical cavities in weak sandstones under a variety of in-situ stress and flow conditions. The theoretical analysis is based on bifurcation theory in combination with a Cosserat continuum, which accounts for effects of grain size. The constitutive model used in this analysis was calibrated to conventional triaxial compression test data. Previously, this approach was successfully used to reproduce the experimentally observed size dependency of hollow cylinder strength in the absence of fluid flow, see Fig. 1. In the present theoretical and experimental studies, both in-situ stress and flow rate (i.e. near-cavity pore pressure gradient) have been varied over a large range of values in order to induce either compressive or tensile sand failure. The theoretical study also addressed the influence of cavity size on compressive versus tensile failure. P. 19
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.