Two hundred and nineteen children (boys: 56%, girls: 44%) were included in a randomized, double-blind, multicentre (4 centres) controlled trial designed to assess the efficacy and safety of ibuprofen (IBU) in the treatment of 1 to 6 year-old children with otoscopically proven acute otitis media (AOM), either unilateral or bilateral. They randomly received 10 mg/kg IBU (n = 71), or acetaminophen (PARA) (n = 73) or placebo (PLA) (n = 75), orally, tid, for 48 hours. All received oral cefaclor (Alfatil, Lilly, France) for seven days. They were evaluated before (D0) and at the end of treatment (D2). The main criterion of response was the aspect (landmarks and color) of the tympanic membrane assessed on a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 6. Other criteria, assessed on semi-quantitative scales, included relief of pain (0 or 1), rectal temperature (0 to 2), and overall evaluation by parents of the improvement of quality of life on three items: appetite (0 to 2), sleep (0 to 2), and playing activity (0 to 2). The results at D2 were as follows: there was no significant difference between treatment groups as to the main criterion, but only a trend for IBU and PARA to do better than PLA but not for IBU to do better than PARA. From these data there is no argument to emphasize the utility of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in treating the inflammatory signs of the tympanic membrane in otitis. There was a statistically significant difference between treatment groups at D2 for pain, IBU being superior to PLA (P < 0.01): 7%, 10% and 25% of the children were still suffering at D2 in the IBU, PARA and PLA treatment groups, respectively. The difference between PARA and PLA for pain was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference between treatment groups for the other criteria. All treatments were well and equally tolerated. Although no significant difference was found between the treatment groups on the aspect of the tympanic membrane, the efficacy of IBU was evidenced on the relief of pain, the symptom that most disturbs the child.
In order to determine if viral selection occurs during mother-to-child transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), we used a direct solid-phase sequencing method to sequence the p17 matrix protein-encoding regions of viral isolates from 12 HIV-1-infected mother-and-child pairs, 4 infected infants, 4 transmitting mothers, and 22 nontransmitting mothers and compared the sequences. The blood samples were collected during the delivery period for the mothers and during the first month of life for most of the children. The p17 nucleic sequences were distributed among several clades corresponding to the HIV-1 A, B, and G subtypes. At the amino acid level, no significant differences within the known p17 functional regions were observed among the subtypes. Statistical analyses could be performed with the B subtype. Within the major p17 antibody binding site, a constant KIEEEQN motif (amino acids 103 to 109) was found in all mother-and-child isolates from the B subtype. On the other hand, 9 of 17 nontransmitting mother isolates were variable in this 103 to 109 region. Thus, this motif was significantly associated with the transmitting status (chi square, P ؍ 0.0034). A valine residue at position 104 was significantly associated with the nontransmitting phenotype (chi square, P ؍ 0.014), suggesting that it has a protective role during vertical transmission. The C-terminal end of p17 was globally conserved among nontransmitting mother isolates (chi square, P ؍ 0.0037). These results might improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of HIV-1 vertical transmission and might allow the screening of seropositive mothers by a rapid molecular or peptide test.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.